1. Janagama Venkati v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be / pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other ap propriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action Respondents more particurarly the Respondent No.3 in resuming the lands of the petitioners without notice and allotting the lands to the Respondent No.7 SCCL company and in not considering the representation dt. 30.'1 '1 .2024 submitted by the petitioners to pay the cornpensation as per Right to Fair compensation and rransparency in Land Acquis tion, Rehabiritation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquiring the lands of the petitroners situated in Sy No.414, Sundilla Village of Ramagiri Nlandal, peddapalli District as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, violation of Articles 14, 2 and 300-,\ of the constitution of lndia besides violation of provisions of the Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resrrtflr:ment Act, 2013 and consequently direct the Respondents to deposit the land acquisition compensation in favour of the petitioners ithe land losers ot, land situated in sy No.414 sundilla Virrage of Ramagiri Mandar, peddapaili D strict, as per the Right to Fair compensation and rransparency in Land Acquisitiorr, Rehabiritation and Resettlement Act, 201 3. |.A.NO:1 OF 202s Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circrmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High co. rt may be preased to direct the Respondents to consider the representations dt. 3ct.11.2024 submitted by the Petitioners and to deposit the land acquisition comoensation in favour of the Petitioners/ th.e land rosers of land situated in Sy No.4.14 sundiila Viilage of Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapaili District, pending disposar of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M.VENUGOPAL RAO 99y1:"t for the Respondent No.1 : SRt S.SRINIVASA REDDy, Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 & 6 : Gp FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI p.SRl HARSHA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.25878 of 2025 ORDER Aggrieved by the action of respondents, more particularly, the. respondent No.3 in resuming the lands of the petitioners without notice and allotting the lands to respondent No.7, SCCL Company and in not considering the petitioners' representation dated 30.11.2024 to pay compensation as per Right to Fair Compensation & Tralsparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act (for short "the Act"), 2013 for acquiring their lands in Survey No.414 situated at Sundilla Village of Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapaili District. A consequential prayer is made to direct the respondents to deposit the land acquisition compensation in favour of the petitioners / land losers of the aforesaid lands, as per the Act, 20 13.

2. Though various grounds are raised in this Writ Petition, the petitioners are confined to the extent of disposing of their representation made to the District Collector, Peddapalli District \ - respondent No.3, dated 30.11.2024

3. Sri Somu Srinivasa Reddy, learned Assistant Governrnent Pleader takes notice for respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6. Sri P.Sri I I 2 Harsha Reddy, learned counsel takes notice for respondent No.7 - The Singareni Colleries Company Limited.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner ald the learned Assistalt Government Pleader for Land r\ctluisition.

5. Learned Assistant Government Plealer for Land Acquisition submitted that to the extent o I disposing the representations submitted by the petitioners, atrrpropriate orders may be passed.

6. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to consider and pass appropriate orders to th: representation made by the petitioners, dated 30.11.2024 wi,-hin a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition rs disposed of No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pen ding in these petitions, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER i'I ,.)' To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secreta'iat, State of

2. The Piincipal Secretary, Revenue Department (LA), Ser;retariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad. Telangana at Hyderabad. '3. The District Collector, Peddallpalli District' +. fh" Additionat District Collector (Revenue), Peddapalli District- . . 5.TheSpecialDeputyColtector,LAUnit,SCCL,Godavarikhani'Peddapalll District. Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT] Ramaoiri. Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District'

6. The Tahsildar, Ramagiri Mandal, Peddapalli District' i. fh" General Managei, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd, RG-1 Area' e. iil c"C" t" GP FoR LAND AcoulslrloN, High court for the state of S. i*o Ct. to CifOn REV'ENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at 10.oi; cC to snt M:VENUGoPAL RAo, Advocate [oPUC] - ii.d; cc to SRI P.sRl HARSHA REDDY, Advocate [oPUC] 12.Two CD CoPies Hyderabad. [OUT] SA GJP tv I - 1i-t ./:. :=. ; r,.l /r. o+ 0 3 riEP 206 \ HIGH COURT DATED:0110912025 I I ORDER WP.No.25878 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \ 3