Criminal Revision Case No. 33 of 2010 · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order, dated 09.12.2009, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, in Crl.M.P.No.1383 of 2009 in C.C.No.7 of 2009. The petitioner herein-accused filed the said petition, under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, before the trial Court seeking to send a cheque for handwriting expert, contending that it is a forged one. Admittedly, when the notice was given by the respondent herein, the petitioner herein never gave any reply denying the issuance of the cheque.
It is contended by learned counsel for first respondent herein that even in the evidence of P.W-1 it was never suggested to him that the cheque is a forged one. Undisputedly, the present petition is filed by the petitioner trial Court after 313 Cr.P.C. herein-accused before examination is over and after he reported no defence. When the petitioner herein-accused absconded, a non-bailable warrant was issued against him. The said cheque was issued for discharge of a debt of a pronote and the pronote is, admittedly, not disputed by the petitioner herein-accused. Considering all the circumstances, I see no merits in this Criminal Revision Case and the same is accordingly dismissed. _________________________ JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY 30th March 2010
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s. 45; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 30 Mar 2010. The bench was P SWAROOP REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.