High Court · 2025

1. Pallepothula Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Dargaiah, Aged about 58 yearS, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o. V.M. Banjara, Penuballi Village and Mandal, Khammam District.

2. Pallepothula Venkateshwar Rao, S/o. Dargaiah, Age. 63 years, Occ. Retd Employee, Fl/o. V.M. Banjara, Penuballi Village and Mandal, Khammam Qistrict. Q. Pallepothula Rama Krishna Rao, S/o. Dargaiah, Age. 65 years, Occ. Ret( Employee, R/o. V.ti/. Banjara, Penuballi Village and Mandal, K:hammam District. ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND

1. Vankudoth Naresh, s/o. Haridasu, Aged 34 years, Occ. Agriqulture. caste. sT Groao"l, Rl/o. Ananthaiam rand6, Seeiharampuram, Singareni Mandal' khammam District ...RESpoNDENT/pETlrloNER Deoartment. Secrelariat, Hvderabad, Telangana. Offices Comolex. Kothaqudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem Distnc!'

2.TheStateofTelangana,Rep.byitsPrincipalsecretaryTribalWelfare 3. ih5 DLtri;lColtector, Bhaciradri Kothagudem District. lntsgrated District . +. The naditional Agent toGovernment -c!.m f roiqctlqfficer,,lntegrated, !rrbal DeveloomentAq6ncv, Bhadrachalam, BhadrAdri Kothagud9r! DlqIlgI' g. jarmm UaisEimha Rao, S/o. not known tqpetitioner, 4999 g!tu!g:1l.9?jP.-:- - Cicc. Retd. MRO., Workinq as Contingent Employee in-tfte gltlAe oI Pr€slolng Offi cei, iToA, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem ulstrlct' ...RESPoNDENrs/BFgPONDEryT$ pptition under Sectipn 101 CfQ praying that in the cir;cumsienqes Ftated [n in support of the petition, tl.re High Court m?Y be plggsed t: the affidavit {!lgd ll.9q ordqrs to vaaate the interim orders dated: 23-09-2024 pagsed in l.a.No. 1 pf 2024 in W.P,[:lo. 7rg2tt 9f 2024 in view of the facts submitted in t[9 counter a{fldaVit of leqponQents 5 to 7. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.V.L.BHANU PRAKASH ;;;$i tor ifib nespondent Nos.1 ro 3: GP FqRlgglrll.,\4lE-LLlIF.. cil+i for ffie neifondent No.4: $Rl MANqAPATI MURALI KRI!$IA c;il;;i1 toiide nigbondent Nos.5 ro 7: $Rl S.MADAN MA|,{4N B p The Cqgrt m4{e the follqwing: ORPER HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLT NANDA ORDER: TP T F o 4 Sri p.V.L. Bhanu prakash, beharf of the petitionr learned counsel for the petitioner :;eeks permission of the Court for withdrawal of the present lvrit petition. The learned counsel appearing on er further submits that the petitioner rnay be given liberty to approach the Court by filing a fresh writ petitic,n duly rectif . mistakes that occurred whire firing the present -.,, ,J;,'""tte 2, permission 3. Accorclingly, the present writ withdrawn gr,anting liberty to the pe Court by filinq a fresh Writ petition. no order aS til costs. petition is dismissed as titioner to approach the However, there shall be is accorded. p"titioT:',';:i':?]i: jfj:,f n.i ir a n y, pendins . rn this Writ \ To 3 4 6 PSK. BS //TRUE COPYII SD/-L. LAKSHIUi BABU GISTRAR T A J E OFFICER 1 One CC to lS RIP.V.L.B 2 Two CCs to GP FOR S Telanga at Hyderab ad One CC to S]RI MANDAP One CC to TJRI S,MADA Two CD Co H, Ad RE, Hi HANU PRAKAS OCIAL WELFA UTJ vocate loPUct gh Cou rt for thir State of MURALIKR ISHNA, Advoc ate loPUCl ATI NM OHAN RAO, Advocate [Opucj t HIGH COURT DATED:3010112025 ORDER WP.No.26217 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION A8 WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS , I q ) c o :, tre S1zr rC: 3 e ll 7 lJlA'i 2025 * t.,eSPATCH ) z 6) r{' l