The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of fVlandamus declaring the inaction 0! second respondent to discharge his statutory duties with the fear of protestation of 4th respondent along with Mahila Societies in front of the PS Kanchanbagh is as illegal, discriminatory, unfair and violation of natural justice, consequently, declare the letter dated 08- 03-2016 obtained by force by the Mahila Societies along with respondent No, 4, by creating Galata at PS Kanchanbagh is as illegal, with a direction to the respondent No. 2 and 3, to take action by following due process of law against the respondent No. 4 for the illegal acts of conducting protest irr petitioner situated at H. No. 9-6-99/28, East Maruthi Nagar, I - 500 079 and at his office situated at office of the Asst TSSPDCL, Zaheerabad, tt/edak District, by 4th respondent rr women welfare societies illegally, while the matter is in pe. the file of Honble Family Court at Hyderabad vide F.C.OF pass such other or orders as this Honble Court may deer circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. 'ront of the house of .anga Reddy District Irivisional Engineer, tr the aid of various l ng adjud ication on 'lo.'105 of 2016 and i: and proper in the l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 13466 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c;irr the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl direct the 1st respondent to enquire in this matter and may b the 2nd and 3rd respondents to restrain the illegal activities c pending disposal of the divorce petition No. 105 of 2016 ,; Family Court at Hyderabad, by following due process of law order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit circumstances of the case. u mstances stated in rnay be pleased to : issue directions to I the 4th respondent r the file of Hon'ble rnd pass such other rnd proper in the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PAVAN KUMAR PUJARI Counsei forthe Respondents No 1 To 3: SRI R LAXMIKAN f I REDDY AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No 4: --- The Court made the following: ORDER a) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION N o-10694 0F 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief ".. to lssue an appropriate writ or order or direction more pafticulaly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaing the inaction of second respondent to discharye his statutory duties with the fear of protestation of 4th respondent along with Mahila Societies in front of the PS Kanchanbagh is as illegal, discriminalory' unfair and violation of natural justice, consequently, declare the letter dated 08-03-2016 obtained by force by the Mahita Soclelles along with respondent No, 4, by crcating Gatata at PS Kanchanbagh rc as illegal, with a direction to the respondent No. 2 and 3, to take action by following due process of law against the respondent No. 4 for the illegal acts of conducting protest in front of the house of pe\ttoner situated at H. No 9-6-99/28, East Maruthi Nagar, Ranga Reddy Disfict - 500 079 and at his office situated at oftice of fhe Assf. Divisional Engineer, ISSPDCL, Zaheerabad, Medak Distict, by 4th respondent with the aid of vaious women welfare socletles iltegally, while the matter is in pending adjudication on lhe fite of Hon'ble Family Coutt at Hyderabad vide F.C.OP.N1.1}5 of 2016 and pass such other or orders as this Hon'ble Couft may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice......"

2. None appeared for the petiticner.

3. Heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.'1 to 3.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the police authorities never received any letter dated 0B-03.2016 as alleged by the petitioner. lt is further submitted that the grievance of the petitioner pertains to F.C.O.P. No. 105 of 2016, which is a matrimonial dispute, and the police are not concerned with the same. Hence, dismissal of the* petition is prayed for. 2

5. I have perused the materials on record.

6. The allegation of the petitioner is that, in tht context of his acquaintance with respondent No- 4, who was alreil 1y married, she exerted pressure on him to marry her and, along vr lr her relatives, created nuisance on several occasions. The petiti I r er states that, having no other option, he lodged a police compl rint, which was registered as Crime No. 415 of 2015. He further allet ers that, against the backdrop of a divorce petition, respondent No. I demanded an amount of Rs.50 lakhs and, upon his refusal, in,i r ged in certain unlawful activities along with members of women's or ;irnizations. The petitioner contends that, in that context, the letter date I 08 03 2016 was executed at the police station. On this basis, he st e,ks appropriate directions from this Court in the present petition.

7. Having regard to the pleadings, and considerin; that the dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 4 is essett ally matrimonial in nature, with proceedings pending before the Family lourt, this Court finds no legal or tenable ground to issue directior s to the police authorities, particularly in light of their categorical asse r i,rn that no such incident, as alleged by the petitioner, had taken place o,ccordingly, this Court is of the considered view that no further as 1 e'ct remains for determination in this petition w J

8. Accordingly this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous Petitlons, pending rf any, shall stand closed. SD/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY' ECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI PAVAN KUMAR PUJARI Advocate I 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies DAN PVL #$l- HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 ORDER WP.No.10694 of 2016 I,tE s Te1 o t * 1 I ri:8 2026 z .rf ,\ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ F*, N.