Paupalli Ramaiah v. B.SESHASAYANA REDDY J
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B SESHASAYANA REDDY
Judgment
According to the learned counsel, the petitioner submitted the initial application and therefore, the matter is rested with the respondents for passing final orders. Such is the situation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the Identification Documents and other particulars furnished by the petitioner and pass final orders within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. _______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY J., Dt.08.09.2005
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8411 of 2005).
← Search more judgments