The High Court · 2025

High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings aga r st the petitioners in spl. s.c.No. 28 of 2022 on the fire of the Speciar Jridge fcr triar of cases under SC's and St's POA Act i 989 cum ll Addt. District- an(t Sessions Judge at Mahabubnaagr which arose out of crime No. 12t2019 of M: rdur potice slition, Narayanapet District, Telangana State, ln the interest of justir:r . l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr p.C praying that r stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, -e ql".T^"q To stay all further proceedings inctudiog appearanc€ Spl..S.C.No 28 of 2022 on the fite oi tne SpecLt .tlOge to SC's and St's POA Act 1 989 cum ll Addl. District and Mahabubnaagr which arose out of Crime No. 1212019 of M,r Narayanapet District, Telangana State, pending disposal cf before this Honourable court, rn the interest of Justice.' the circumstances High Court may be of the Petitioner in rial of cases under )essions Judge at ldur Police Station, the quash petition l.A.Nos:3& 4 AF 2025 Between: Medigeri Kashappa. S/o. Buchappa. Aged 35 years. Occ. Agric I :ure, R/o. Nidiiintha viilaoe Kothaoatii'H,lano'arioro ilraaauiil-inoir) r rrayanpet ( ord Mahabubhasar) Dis-tncr petitioneil iiEJpJ ii?ij[j'A XLl s And Agriculture years, Occ. Agriculture . Respondenv complainant HyoeraDad. 1 ll.g-q!{g,"f Tetangana. Rep. by its pubtic prosecutor, Hil r Courr, 2. Lingagari Srinrvas Reddy, S/o. pedda Basi Reddy @ tasireddy, Age 45 3. Bonapah @ Bommanpati Anjrlaiah, S/o. Narayana, Agrr d 46 years, Occ. 4. Bobbili Thimma Reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 3g yea.r Occ. Agriculture 5. Lingagari Bal Reddy, S/o Kista Reddy, Aged 36, Agricuttur 6. Bogali Krran Kumar, S/o. Janardhan, Aged 46 years, Occ. I griculture 7. Lingagari Raghava Reddy, S/o. Bhagavanth Reddy, Agt d 45 years, Occ. 8. Kothapally Venkatram Reddy @ Enjamuri Venkat rami lt rddy, S/o. Chinna 9. Kothapalty Gopat Reddv @ Enjamuri Gopal Reddy, S/o. Cl.nna Reddy, Aged Reddy, Aged 46 years. Occ Agn-rcuttJie 44 Years. Occ. Agriculturd, AI are R/o Nidiiintha vilage, Kothapali Mandar( orc Maodur Mandar) Narayanpet ( otd'Ir,,tahabub,i"ga4 Dil[ri;i 2 to 9 in "'l --''R".[,1dents Agriculture l.A.Nos. 3 and 4 ol i,.t 25 l.A.No. 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 32O Cr.P.C. & 359 (6)BNSS R/w. 526 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to file compound petition to compound the offence with the respondenuaccused who is the Petitioner in the above crl.P.No. l2o2s on the file of this Hon'ble court which flled to.quash the proceedings in Spt. S.c,No. 28 of 2022 on the file of the Speciat Judge for trial of cases under sc's and st's poA Act 19g9 cum ll Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Mahabubnaagr which arose our of Crime No. 1212019 of Maddur Police Station, Narayanapet District, Telangana State l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS R/w. 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,tne High court may be pleased to compound the offence with the accused who is the Petitioners in crl P.No. 12025 on the file of this Honourable court which is filed to quash the proceedings in Spl. S.C.No. 28 of 2022 on the file of the Special Judge for trial of cases under sc's and st's poA Act 1999 cum ll Addl. District a;d Sessions Judge at Mahabubnaagr which arose out of Crime No. 1212019 of Maddur Police Station, Narayanapet District, Telangana State, This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of srl Dr. CHALLA sRlNlvASA REDDY,Advocate for the petitioners in crl.petiiton and Respondent Nos- 2 to 9 in l.A.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 and the Addl. public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of M/s. N. VANI SREE, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in Crl.Petitron and Petitioner in l.A.Nos. 3and 4 of 2025. The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUM,{:A DEVI EADA I.A.N OS-3 and4of 2021; in/and CRIMIN ALP ETITlo NN o.11 057 _rf 2025 COMMON ORDFR This Criminal petition is filed by the petitir rrers_accused Nos.1 to g under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 solking to quash the proceedings against them in Spl.S.C.No.2g o. ZO22 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SCs/SI; (pOA) Act, 19g9_ cum_ll Additional District and Sessions Judge at Mahabubnagar, registered for the alleged offences punishable un< er Section 506 r/w. 34 of tpC and Secrion S(t )(4(s) of SC/ST (pOe; a :t, 2015. lt is submitted by learned counsel it rpearing for the 2. petitioners-accused Nos.1 to g as well as r _.spondent No.2_ de facto complainant that during pendency of th-. present criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed seeking r compound the offences and to compromise the matter in the above Spl.S.C., respectively. .) The learned Additional public prosecutor l-i s opposed the said compromise petitions. ) EfD, J crtp t roiT )t)) 5

4. Perused the affidavit filed by lhe de facto complainant in l.A Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that he has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vlde orders dated 29.08.2025, 13 10.2025 and 06.1 1.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted reports dated 09.09.2025 and 17.11.2025 to that effect stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.2B ot 2022 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of 3 irD.t (tli lll)57 tDj Cases under SCs/STs (pOA) Act, 198g_cum_ll A<l itisn6; District and Sessions Judge at Mahabubnagar, regiskr :d against the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to g, are hereby guasled subject to the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 paying an amo rnt of Rs.S,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, ligh Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the Sta:r of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five Thouse nd Only) to the Telangana Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a p:.iod of three (03) weeks from today and file proof of the same before t te Registry. 7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, slr, ll stand closed. \ To' //TRUE COPY// SD/.C.DEEPIKA iTANT REGISTRAR SI " SECTION OFFICER I' 1/ II Addt District a;d sessionJJu;s;; rir,jr""i"Elo"r5u",

1. The Special Judoe for Trial of Cases Under SC,s and Sts pOAAct1989cum 2. The Station House Officer, Maddur police Station, NarayE lpet Dist ' IX8"?""rt f,j,)fJ" t,.o"""'tor, Hish court for the state c f reransana at 4. One CC to SRI Dr CHALLA SR|N|VASA REDDY, Advoca e [OpUC] 5. One CC to M/s. N. VAN| SREE, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies ( ATONG WITH A COPY OF JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE ) Note: Total Amount of Rs. I 0,000/- ( Rupces Ten Thousand Only ) ha. cen paid by Sri Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY. Counscl for the petitioncr as dirrr cd by the }lon,ble Court Orde r dated 24-ll_2 c Tho r and Only)rorhe Secretary, High Coun Legal Service s Commitee, I{igh Courr lor th. itate of Telangan4 Hyderabad and Rs. 5.000i ( Rupees F ive l housand Only ) ro rhe Tei anr I na Bar Association, yderabad and filed Mem o for pavment ol Cost No. 14092 of 2025 drrt rd 0i- 12- 202i Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Fiv 025 as G KULIPSL I /,'t t6 [E-[ 2U5 '-:. r., . rC i' ,/ HIGH COURT DATED:2411112025 COMMON ORDER t.A. NOS. 3 AND 4 0F 2025 IN/.AND CRLP.No.11057 of 2025 AILOWING Tt{E IA. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 AND CRL.PETITION \r I I __ 22 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAEAD BETWEEN: CRL.P.No. OF 2025

1. Lingagari Srinivas Reddy S/o. Pedda Basi Reddy @ Basireddy' Age 45 Years, Occ; Agriculture

2. Bonapati @ Bommanpati Anjilaiah S/o Narayana' Aged 46 Years, Occ; Agriculture

3. Bobbili Thimma Reddy S/o. Srinivas Reddy' Aged 38 Years, Occ; Agriculture

4. LingagariBal Reddy S/o. Kista Reddy, Aged 36, Agriculture

5. Bogali Kiran Kumar S/o. Janardhan, Aged 46 Years, Obc; Agriculture

6. Lingagari Raghava Reddy S/o. Biragavanth Reddy' Aged 45 Years, Occ; Agriculture

7. Kothapally Venkatram Reddy @ Enjamiiri Venkat rami Reddy Slo: ininna Reddy, Aged 46 years, Ccc; Agriculture

8. Kothapally Gopal Reddy @ Enjar'.,:ur-i Gopal Reddy Slo. Chinna Reddy, Aged 44 Years, Occ, Agriculture, All are R/o Nidijintha village, Kothapalli lVlandal( old Maddur lvlandal) Narayanpet ( old Mahabubnagar) Didtrict ...:.pETITIONERS/A_1 to A_B And

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, n'gi ;r,1, Hyderabad. - ;. RESPoNDE-NflcovtplRtt'tRur

3. Medigeri Kashappa S/o. Buchappa, Aged; 35 Years; Occ: Agricirlture n7o a Nioilintha vifiage; Kothapaiti Mandat( otd Maddur tvlandal) Narayanpet ( OId Mahabubnagar ) Didtrict - . ... ... RESPONDENT/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT .) 23 JOINT M EMO \ '1 . The Petitioner herein filed quash petition to quash t- Spl. S.C.No' 28 of 2O22on the file of the Special Jud11' under SC's & St's POA Act 1989 cum ll Addl Dislt Judge at tt/lahabubnaagr which arose out of Crime tvladdurPoliceStation,NarayanapetDistrict'Telar't Petitioner and the znd respondenU Defecto-r:t compromise out of court and Defecto-complainatl respondent in the petition also filed affidavit and pet the offences, hence this memo' It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be lleased to receive this joint memo and compound t!'ie offence and pass I uch other order or orders in the circumstances of the case' -' proceedings in r for trial of cases ct and Sessions No 1212019 of ana State. The mplainant have who is the 2nd tion to compound 2 D.tro 2nd : etitioner L - <-= .i .> :J U Ory ^> 4th Pe titioner 6th [, gt' P"€F,*.. -A COUNSEL rHE PETIT NER COUNSEL FO p R J"^^Y .HER ESPONDENT / ,f -r".rj> c- l"tPetitioner C €$&\)..t"N"SV 3'd Petitioner 1 P 5th 1:D-i}-:,. 7th Petitioner . Y -e'fe 2nd respondenWictim HYDERABAD DATE: ry,"-OB-2025