The High Court · 2025

7 - smt. Dhamini, wo: Dasru. aqgd1r.bgyt.4s years, R/o: Nallacheruvu Thanda,

8. Gummadi Yadi Redv, age{about 50 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o: sh ivrampaily Viilagb, Raend ranagar Manoat, H. n-.bGtir.t ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High court may be pleased to order or direction more particularty one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction holding that the action of the Respondent No.3 in lnterfering in the civil disputes in between the Petitioner and then Respondents No.4 to 8 herein, by calling the Petitioner to the Police station P.S. Maheshwerram and pressurizing him to part with his property i.e agricultural land bearing liy.No.304/AA1 admeasuring Ac.4-00 Gts. and Sy.No.304AA2, admeasuring Ac.3-39 Gts. totally admeasuring Ac7-39 Gts, situated at Pendyal Revenue Villagr: and Grampanchayat, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy District with the Respondents No.4 to 8 herein is illegal, arbitrary, motivated, malicious and amounts tr> abuse of the powers vested in him and also violative of Article 14,19,21 and :300A of the Constitution of lndia and Consequently direct the respondent no.ll not to cause any interference in the civil disputes in between the Petitioner and Flespondents No.4 to 8 herein. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2I016(WPMP. NO: 18708 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.3 not to cause any interference in the civil disputes in between the Petitioner and Respondents No.4 to 8 herein in respect of the Property i.e., al;ricultural'and bearing Sy.No.304/AA1 admeasuring Ac.3-39 Gts. totally admeasuring Ac7-39 Gts, situated at Pendyal Revenue Village and Grampanchayal, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy DiStrict owned and possessed by the Petitioner, by calling the Petitioner to the police station P.S. Maheshwaram rluring the pendency of the writ Petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016ftWMP. NO: 2251 OF 2016) Between:

1. The State of Telangana represented by the Principal Secretary, Home Departme,nt, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Assis,tant Commissioner of Police lbrahimpatnam, lbrahimpatnam Zone, Ibrahimpertnam, R. R. District.

3. The lnspector of Police/The Station House Officer, P.S. Maheshwaram, R.R. District. ...PETITIONERSTRESPONDENTS 1,2 and 3 AND 1 Naveen Reddy Nukala, S/o: Sri N. Shaker Reddy, ...PETITIONER 2 3 Mudavath Lokiva. S/o: BadVa, aged about 45 years, R/o pendyala Village Maheshwaram-Mandal, n.(. bisiriit. -- Mudavath Limbiva. S/o: Badya, aged about 40 years, R./o: pendyala Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, n.n.'oisiict. t 5. Smt. Dhamini, *,o: Dasru, aged about 45 years, R/o: Nallacheruvu Thanda, M:fl 31f,*,["#r,fuilo;,,tfi Hlb?.y;3t:b"* 35 vears, Rr/o: pendvara viilase, Ramchandraguda Mandal. nln-Oiiirict - 'verY'| 'Ysrv' !v\ I \ '8,1TSi,'igt"f s:fi,"$lft j"."rr"#'ft "?8133:[i "?::1,tH:'1$i{,?,b, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order passed interim orders passed in wpMp.No.1g70g of 2016 in WP.No.15068 of 2016 dated 28.4.2016 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt MD AJMAL AHMED (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3: SRI R. LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7:__ The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETIT ION No.15068 oF 2016 OR ER: This Writ Petition is filecl under Afticle 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief/s:- " ...tc issue a v,rit or orcler or clirection more purticularl.V one tn the nature of Writ o.f Manclnnttts, fleclare the inaction o/' tlrc 2"'t Resprtnclent v'ith the inter!,:rence in civil tlisputes in bchtaen the patitirtttcr and tha respondcnt Nos.4 to 8 herein, by ctrlling the pctitittrtar l() thc polica stalion PS Muheshv,arom ancl presrurizing hinr to purt v'ith his propert.v i.c., agricullural I ancl oeari ng Sy. No. 3 04/A A l, utl nteusttri ng A c. 4. 0() gtttt t Q -\ u rul Sv. No. 3 04 /AA 2' admenstrring Ac.3-39 guntas, totall.v urlmcosttring Ac.7.-i9 gtuttus, situuted at pencl.tal Reientrc Village antl Gram Panchu.tat, A,luheshv'artmr Murulal, llanga Rerlttv District ttith the respondent Nos.4 ttt I hcrcin us illegul, orbilrary, motii,ated, maliciotts and aruottttls to obuse o/'tlrc Pltl'ers vested in hin antl also ,,iolotite qf Articles 14, t9, 2l untl -100-tl ol the Con.slittttion of lruliu urul const:qttently direct the rcsporulcnt No.-J not to causc tttry intarllrence in lhe cittil ciisputes in bel,,rleen tlrc pcilfioner orul rcspttntlcnt Nos.4 Io ll lrcrein und pass such order or orders..."

2. None appears for the petitioners-

3. I hzrve heard Mr.R.Laxrnikanth Redcly, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Hotne appearing for respondent Nois.l to 3

4. The, learned Assistant Governrnent Pleader for Horne contends that the respondents have never sulnrnoned the petitioner to the police station, nor have they exerled any pressure upon hirn to alienate his agricultural property, as I It alleged in the writ petition. It is urged tltat, in the atrsence of any cogent material substantiating such allegations, the clairns advanced in the writ petition are devoid of merit and the petition therefore deserves clisruissal. 2

5. I have carefully perused the pleadings and rnaterials available on record.

6. Having regard to the subrnissions of counsel, the documentary record, and the interirn order of this Court dated 28.04.2016, it is deerned appropriate to reiterate that the respondent/police are expressly restrained frotn exerting any forrn of coercion or undue influence upon the petitioner or any other party, even under the guise of registered crirne. Should the situation warrant investigation, the respondents shatt strictly adhere to the statutory framework. Any investigative action urust therefbre'be undeftaken only in accordance with due process of law, ensuring the protection of the fundarnental rights guaranteed under Articles 2l and 22 of theConstitution of India'

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is allowed. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, sfuall standclosed. SD/- P .NAGABHUSHAMBA PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, \

1. 2. One CC to Sri Md AjmalAhmed, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies TJ PSK. HIGH COTIRT DATED:1410812025 l OR Eri WP.No.15068 of 2016 a () (J ( ,v '{HE S TA ? 2 JAN 2O2E iI i i ,*"'i,-41p' ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOU] COSTS q-