✦ High Court of India · 29 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,149 words

Acts & Sections

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT P ETITION NO :25677 0F 2025 Between:

1. Mr Ahmed Ashan Khan, S/o Late qhylaT Mohd lrshad'.Aged about 43 yrs' &;ilffi;rov"". ilo H"o. g-1-ssg Kachiguda' Hvderabad' 2. Basheer Fatima Nusrath, Wo late Gfulgl Mohd lrshad Aged about 70 yrs' ' 6i;.'H;r;ri"io nl j H .b. 5-1-aas Kachisuda, Hvderabad' ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, Through its Principal Secretary' Home' having office at TG Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Road No'12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 3'TheASst.commissionerofPolice,KachigudaDivision,Hyderabad. 4. The Station house officer, P S Kachiguda' Hyderabad' 5.SriM.MazharuddinJaveed,S/oMohd-HafeezlddinAoedabout55yrs'Occ' Business, wo as givl;'in?'i'priti i:z-io7' Cnappat Bazar' Hvderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in ii":litiaruit tiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an oroer,''a]rJion o, , writ particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring tnat ir,e ,ciion of the respondents irlo 3 and 4 in compelling the petitioner to hand *"i po.."..ion of entirb g,round floor of house hearing no' under the 3-1-339, situated at KacniJuda, Hyderabad to the respondent No threat of arresting in f f n r'13. ZSb oi ioas' by adding offences calling for more than 7 years, within 3 days is f,ighty itt"g't, arbiirary' amounts to colorable exercise of powers and unconstitut,on,i 6ontEquently' direct the respondents No 3 and 4 to compel lhgT-lo h.gn! over not to harass the petrtroier-' "tV "nn"r. possession of entire gro-rnJ floo' of hout" bearing no 3-1-339' situated at kachiguda, Hyderabad, to the respondent No 5' -5' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petit|onunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass an interim direction thereby directing the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner in any manner to compel them to hand over possession of entire lround floor of houie bearing no.3-i-3a9, situated at Kachiguda, Hyderabad, to the respondent No. 5. t Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHAMMAD ADNAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI M' SRINIVAS AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the ResPondent No.S: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SI(I JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WIUT PETIT ION No.25 b// of 2025 Q!!pER: I{eard learnecl counsel for the petitioners and Sri.M Srinivas, Iearned Assistant Gor"ernment Pteader for Home appearing for respondent Nos l to I Wittr their consent, this r'rrrit petition is being taken 'up for clisposal at [he admission stagc itscli'

2. This n,rit petition has been f iled seeking the following Prayer:- " lo tlt,clrtrc lltc acttttrt ot' Ilrc resporulttttt Nos 3 arLtl 4 in cornpeLling tlu' ltetilrttttcr ltt ltrtttLl rtt'Lt p';sst's'slott L)-t L'nhrr groutul floor oJ ltotLsr /renrin,g No -3 t ';:g, ''i"'t:'t ^tlte- ,i'r)rpu,,nl* n t No.5' ttrLdcr tle tltrt'tl oi a"esli'g in LIR N0 238 of 2025 t'o tttort tlinn 7, ycnis u'ithm 3 days is higltlt'1 tllegal, orltitrorr, n"""')i u' to colortbie exercise of pott'ers anLl tlrt' resprttu7e.rLts No 3 antL 4 not utrt:otrstittttiottrtl CortstLluttrtly 'lLrcct to- ompel- tlrcm Lo lund ot'er ttt hnrass tla pelittont:i m on'y *'""" ;.rosscssion ol entn-e g''o"na fti' of houst bearing,,No'3 1 339' situaltd ',tl k,u.ltiguin, Hy'!''rnhnd lo tfu re'pondcnl No '' nt krrc/r13ir'irr' llyderob-''^ to g ,11,"" 'nt)ir.g 'iy'r,,1,1,in Bricf facts statecl in this u'rit petition are that the pctitioners claims to 3. bi' in possession of eastern sicle of the ground floor of propertv bealirrg Ntr"i 1-.139, situatt'cl at Kaclriguda, Hyderabad lt is frrrther statccl Ihat onc Srnt.SikenderJehanBegum,fileclOSNo-1U5trt2024'seel<ingdcclarationantl recovery of possession in respect of thc subjcct proierq' antl tht' sirnt' it pending for framings issues The case of the petitioners is that responclent No,5fileclacomplaintbeforctherespondentauthoritiesanclthereafter,FlR No,238of2025fortlffenceuntlerSectiorr32g(3),324(4)ofBharatiyaNag;rrrk Suraksha sanhita, 2023 (herein after referred as'BNSS',) was registeretl .igainsl Lhe pctitioncrs. Furthc'r casc of the petitioners is that on 23082025' the respondent authoritics summoned the petitioners to thc police station antl 2 propertV to threaienecl them to delive r. the Possession of t6c subjcct rcspondent No.5. Aggrier.eci bv the samc, this n,rit petition is filed .1. l,eamcd Assrstant Govemrnent pleacier for Home appcaring for rcspondellt Nos r t.4 pracccr on rcco'd instructi.lls issuecl by sub_[ns'r:ctor o[ Poiice' K'rchrguda lrolice statio., Ii'rlerabad, r,vherein it is st.rrccl rlL:rt responcrent rr-o 5 (Ge'rcrar I).r,r.cr .f Attrir,e_y hordcr of Ms.ska.der. Jchan Begum) made a cornplaint stating Ms,skarcrer Jehan Begum is the on..er of the subicct Propcrtv anci she had pc,nitted trre pctrti.rcrs to stav ilr e;tster.n side of trrc propertv o' trrr: g,ou,d floor ad,casur-ing -t0 sq r:ar.crs. -r-hcrcafter., thc peti tiorrcrr..ha ve occripicci a portion in thc first floor also. It is furthcr statcd trrat ort 27 o(t 2025, trre petitiorrcrs iravt- trespassed ihe locked prcmises of the subject property ancr disco^nected CCTV camcras a.d broke operr comrnon walr rf trre bathroorn ancr ilregarv occupiccl the portion. It is arso staled tl-ra t sonti,olcJ btass, bronze ancl coprprcl iter.ns :rpcl other valuables a1e not [ou^d trrc resp.ndent No.5,racre a co.rpraint ancl r.equester-1 the auth.rities to takL' actiorrs aga,st petrti,rrcrs. oa such c.n-rplai^t, Crir..e No.238 of 2025 ciatccl 11.07.2025 undcr Scction 329 (.1),321(1) of BNSS was registered, TIre'eaftcr, on 20.08.2025 .oticc ur.rder Scctio.35(3) of BNSS were scr'cd on petitiolle's and trre case is urder in.",cstrgation for exami.ing witnesses and collectiou of er.iclence. 'encc'

5. Learnecl ,\ssistant .orrernrnent pleader for Horne f ur ther submits that except conducting rnr''estigati.n i, crimc No 238 of 2025, respo,clent No.,l diir trot compel thc petitioncrs to l.Lar.rc1 over possession of the propcrty to fespondent No.5 l 6. Rccording the submissions made by learned counsel apPearrng on eithcl sicle and without expressing any opinion on the rnerits of the case this writ petition is disposed of directing the responclent authorities to completc the investigation by following due proceilure as contemPlatcd under law and bel.ore initiating anY action against the petitioners' the respondcnt authoritics are clirected to follow due proccclure as contemplated uncler lalr''

7. With the above directions' this writ petition is disposccl of' N4iscellaneous applications, if anv pending' shall stancl closed No orderr as tcr cos ts SD/. ED S ifii'.'E'&'[HiH //TRUE COPY// CT.ON OF FICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary' Home' having office at TG Secretariat' Hyderabad' , The Commissioner of pofiJt' UVO"*oad City' Road NO.12' Baniara Hilts' ; l[li::ommissioner of Polce' Kachiguda Division' Hvderabad' 4. The Station house officer' P'S' Kachiguda' Hyderabad' 5. One CC to SRI MOHAMMAD ADNAN Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP f On HOft'fE 'Uigh Court for the State of Telangana IOUTI 7 KKS GJP Two CD CoPies OF HIGH COURT DATED:29 t}Bt2O2S ; i I I ORDER WP.No.25677 of ZO2S .:;:=\, .' - ; '-1, Ol i.: ,:!-' '() .S' s \' ,' .:j r'.1' :CllrJ 7 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (e- I1- n ))

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments