1. Sultan Ul Uloom Educational Society v. The State of Telangana

Mr. Syed Atif Ahmed, S/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- lvlajor, R/o. H.No.6-5- 187, New Bhoiguda Road, IM.l.G.H Colony, Secunderabad. Ms. Shaik Afreen, D/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- I\,4ajor, RJo. Plot No. 99, Road No. 3, KRR Hills Colony, Nandhi Hills, fvleerpet, Hyderabad I\rls. Sana Sultana. D/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- I\,4ajor, R/o. H.No.14-20- 225, Pandit Nehru Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad. [\/s. Saniya Fahim, D/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- Ivlajor, R/o. H.No.5-2- 281. Raheempura, Korutla, Jagtial, Telangana. [,/ls. Ayesha Jahan, D/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- Iviajor, Rl/o- H.No.304, Ushodaya Tower, Shapur Nagar, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad. l\rls. Hajera Rehman, D/o. Not known to Petitioner Age- Ir,4ajor, Rio H.No.301, Sai Residency, Bazarghat, Vijaynagar Colony, Hyderabad. '10.lvls. Sara Banu, Dio. Not known to Petitioner Age- Major, R/o H.No.12-1 1- 6291 1 8318, Warasiguda, Secunderabad. / '1 1. [\rls _Sumayya Fatima, D/o. Not known to petitioner Age- I\,4ajor, R/o. H.No. 2y'_ 4-351, Shadilal Galli Kotta Alijah, Hyderabad. '12.Ms. Madiha F^aiyaz Ahmed, D/o. Not known to petitioner Age_ Major, Rt/o. H.no.16-'102, Gurumurthy Nagar, Opp-lDpL Cotony, Satanagar] nyd"iOjOrif . 13.[\tls..Sania B_egum,^D/o. Not known to petitioner Age- tVajor, R/o H.No..l2_1_ 70, Khadar Basha Street, Badrachalam, Telangana.

14. Ms. Minhaj gnnisa Begum, D/o. Not known to petitioner Age- I\ilajor, Rl/o. H.no.8-2-310/A 132, Banjara Hiils, Road No.10, Hyderabad.

15.[t4s. Sania Fatima, D/o. Not known to petitioner Age_ Major, Rl/o. H.no. 5-5_ 141l1 , Darurssalam, Nampally, Hyderabad. '16. t\/s. shaik sana Farheen Banu, D/o. Not known to petitioner Age- Major, Fr/o. H.no.10-5-391/5413251c,Syed Nagar, First Lancer, Hyderabad." 17 V:.^TlnT{l'.Be^gum,.D/o. Not known to petitioner Age, tr,4ajor, Rl/o H.No..t0_ 5-391/5413251c, Syed Nagar, First Lancer, Hyderabadl

18.Ms. Jasmeen Fatima, D/o. Not known to petitioner Aqe- Maior. R/o. survev No.. 57. Hasmathpet, Anjaiah Nagar. t\/asjid Umar fZioo. btO' e;enialil Hyderabad.

19. l\/s._Gho^usiy1 D/o. Not known to petitioner Age- Major, R:/o H.No.10_ 5-150, 2nd 82, Ahmed Nagar, First Lancer, Near"t,lashdmin ffotef,-Asif Nagar, Hyderabad. ^Begum, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that In the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of certiorari a. calling for the record and the order dated 21.0g.2025 passed in complaint SR No 2319 of 2025 in HRC No. 4775 of 2025 on the file of the Honble Telangana State Human Rights commission filed by Respondent Nos.3 to 19 and quash the same as being wholy arbitrary, rlegar, u nco nstitutiona r, without jurisdiction, and ultra vires the provisions of the protection of Human Rights Act, 'lgg3, apart from being violative of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India, b. and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the effect and operation of the order dared 21 .08.2025 passed by the Honbre Telangana State Human Rights commission in compraint SR No. 2319 of 202s in 7 HRC No. 4775 of 2025 flled by Respondent Nos. 3 to 19 pending disposal of the ' above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI TARUN G. REDDY cou nser for the Responde nt No. f iEf*lXtl?[rf'Xtil,lj^itXl Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3TO19 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER ,/ THE HON'IILE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND ]CHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No.25439 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Tarun G.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri M.Vamshi Kiran Yadav, learned Assistant (iovernment Pleader lor Higher Education Department, appearing for respondent No. 1.

2. By the impugned order dated 21.O8.2025 the Teiangana Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as, "the Commission") in H.R.C.No.4Z7S of 2025 has made a recommendation to return the certi{icates of complainants/ students forthwith and report to the learned Commission. The District Coilector, Hyderabad District, has been directed to take appropriate and necessary action in tune with the recommendation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitionerr: submits that the complaint was lodged on 21 .O8.2O25 (Annexure p2) and the impugned order was passecl on the same date. The -) proceedings sufler from not only violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioners, who are representatives of the educational society and institutions, werd not put to notice but a-1so suffers from lack of jurisdiction, since the grievalce of non-return of educational certificates to the complainants/ students does not come within the definition of "Human Rights" under Section 2(d) of the Protection of Human Rigl-rts Act, 1993. He also refers to Regulation 9 of the National Humal Rights Commission (Procedure) Regulations, 1 994, lr'hert:in ordinariiy n-iatters enumerated therein would not be entertained by the Comrnission. However, he submits that the learned Commission has issued summons on 25.08.2O25 to the Chairman and Principal of the Sultan-ul Uloom Coilege of the petitioner No.1 - Society. Therefore, he seeks liberty to the petitioners to appear before the learned Commission and take all objections as are available on facts and in iaw. It is prayed that till the proceedings are closed after taking note of the petitioners' objection, the impugned order may be kept in abeyance. / ,)

4. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, we are of the view that in the instant proceedings i'e', H.R.C.No.4775 of 2025, if the petitioners have been asked to appear and file their response/reply affidavit, the passing of impugned order in the nature of making recommendations to the District Collector, Hyderabad, was premature.

5. We refrain from observing on the question of the jurisdiction ol the Commission at this stage, since the petitioners are willing to appear and file their reply affrdavit to the summons issued upon them on 25'OB'2O25' However, since the proceedings appear to be underway in view of the summons dated 25.08.2025 issued upon the petitioners, the impugned order be kept in abeyalce till the proceedings are closed after considering the objection of the petitioners, if any, and upon hearing the parties by the learned Commission. The petitioners should appear and file their objection, if any, before the learned Commission within a period o[ one week. I

6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stancl ciosed. SD/. A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, .l . The Principal secretary Higher Education Department, secretariat Buildings, State of T6langana, HYderabad

2. The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 3. One CC to SRI TARUN G. REDDY, Advocate lOPUCl 4.TwoCCstoGPFoRH|GHEREDUCATION,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUT] 5,TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD CoPies. BSK TKS HIGH COURT DATED:28rc812025 Y q -):.) J ! Ht:iT4r 0rT flU5 2S : .t -, :i ORDER WP.No.25439 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o