✦ High Court of India · 26 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Aug 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

26 Aug 2025

Bench

ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI COURT SENIOR CIVIL COURTOFTHESENIORCIVIL GOURT SENIOR CIVIL

Length

21,300 words

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals A tT Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.205 ot 2o1s on the fire of the court of the senior civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. th€nthamma, Wo.Balaiah, Age 55 years, Occ. Aqricull Village of Kothakota Mandai, wanaparthy District. tu!e' R/o'Kanayapally .AppellanUClaimant AND U:otJ,f,tJil o*utv collector, Rajiv Lift I rrigation scheme-Phase-l l, Pebbair ...ReSpondenURespondent Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V ManoharRao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals !5 ON FIRST OF Appr:al under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No 183 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between Dass, S/o. Naganna, Age 42 yea$, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothako:a Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Sper;ial Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...ResPondenUResPondent Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND AC OLIISITION FIRST AP L NO: 755 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O P.No.171 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Chandra Eabu, S/o.Balaiah, Age 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diatrict. ,' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.247 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Ramulu, S/o. Yellanna, Age 49 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.179 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between ftS{f, :ii.B'ft:iY,i]ilfu #B:r;? ilffi;?, o.c Asricurture, Kanayapary vi,ase or AND ...AppellanUClaimant I3:r:J""rtJil.Deputv collector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-rr, pebbair Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals .. Resf ondenURespondent LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 758 OF 2025 Apoeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.20'6 in O.P.No.238 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Manemma, Wo.Kondanna, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village . of Kothitkota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...ResPondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals FI F AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016ino.P.No.191of2015onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil Judge, at WanaParthY Between: [3[il 3ilu'^i? ],isi $ffi; S??",' J ffi 3 AND Occ. Agriculture, KanaYaPallY , Village of ...APPellanUClaimant TheSpecitrlDeputyCollector,LA,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Aase-ll,Pebbair. RepPondenUResPondent Counsel for tlre Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 760 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.251 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: J-Murali, S/o.Savara-iah, Age. 44_years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair. "'RespondenuRespondent Gounser for the Appeilant : sri. v Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST AppEAL NO: 761 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'2016 in o P.No -261 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: t ills[3 3lfl?,., Hl?; i,?th f f,flyjl; #&t3 J,ia rs, o cc As ri c u r t u re, Kan ay ap ayy AND ...AppellanUClaimant 'The special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-irhase-ll, pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeais Appeal under Section of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated '10.03.2016 in O.P.No.197 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at lVanaparthy. Between: Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Vlllage of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals N 763 Appeal under Section 54 of L A Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.185 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at War'aParthY. Bala Manetnma, Wo.Venkataiah Mandal, Wan village of K()thakota , Age 46 Years aparthy District. Occ.Agri culture, KanayaPally , .AppellanUClaimant AND The SPecial Deputy Collector, LA Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' ...ResPondenUResPonden t Counsel for thr; APPellant Counsel for th(, Respondent : GP for Appeals : Sri. V Manohar Rao Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.250 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Venu, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of . Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 ol L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.190 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: J.Naganna, S/o.Balaiah, Aqe 71 vears Kothakota Mandat, wanbpirtny Oisirlci.' Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of ! AND ..AppellanUClaimant The special Deputy cotlector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-phase-ll, pebbair ..RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACCIUI SITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 766 OF 2025 Appoal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.20t6 in O.P.No.193 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \l/anaparthy. Between: Renuka, D/9 NqSill'.a, Age 34_years, Occ. Agricutture, Kanayapaily Viltage of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:767 oF 2025 AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.264 0t 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between subrahmanr'am, S/o.Chandraiah, Age 41-years' Occ- Agricrilture' Kanayapally Vittage of K(itnakota Mandal, Wanaparthy utstnct' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special t)eputy Collector, Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L'A'Act against 10.03.2016 in O'P'No'198 of 2015 on the file Judge, at WanaParthY the Judgment and Decree dated of the Court of the Senior Civil Between 38 years Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah' {9-e vi I I a g e of Koth axo,J'[rr i'.|d. i, wi n ap a-rthv D istrict' , Occ. Agriculture, KanaYaPallY .ApPellanUClaimant AND TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase-ll,Pebbair. ..ResPondenUResPonent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L'A'Act against 10.03.2016 in O'P'No'258 of 2015 on the file Judge, at WanaParthY the Judgment and Decree dated of the Court of the Senior Civil Between ffi,?:?t?i','fii a J illi I I 3 #& B1'l'"' &: Occ Ag riculture, KanaYaPallY Village of , ...ApPellanUGlaimant AND TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RalivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase-tI,Pebbair. ..ResPondenUResPonent Counselfor the Appellant : Sri' V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'201ri in o'P'No'256 of 2015 on the fire of the court of the senior civit Judge, at \Uanaparthy. "- Yr rrrs Between 0,i IrT i F t*X5,?;,"t',fi "I?'li,'ffi ,l3;,*f,i JSf, B o cc A s ri c u r tu re, Ka n a ya p a, y AND ...AppellanUClaimant The sper:ial Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift t'igation scheme_phase_,, pebbair ..RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counset for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals Appear under Section 54 0f L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'2016 i, o'P'No'263 of 2015 on the fire of the court of the senior civir Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: 9lii:!:Tfi b,,g[?8T:fl !?it .ig;.,1f, bffi , o.. Asricurture, Kanayapa,y AND ...AppeltanUClaimant The Special Deputy collector LA, Rajiv Lift trrigation scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals " ...Respondent r 1 i APPeal under Section 54 of 10.03.2016 in O'P'No '262 ol 20 Judge, at WanaParthY L.A.Act against 15 on the file the Judgment and Decree dated o, ,n, Court of the Senior Civil Between: Occ. Agriculture' KanaYaPallY $iiflH.?'*H*?;["?iift "feT\)$;.tB:'*fl ?J3?13i ..APPellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector' Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scher Responden r--:-^+i^n qeheme LA Phase ll Pebbair' ..RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the APPellant : Counsel for the ResPondent : Sri. V Manohar Rao GP for APPeals ApPeal under Section 54 of L'A'Act 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.249 of 2015 on the Judge, at WanaParthY' against the Judgment and Decree dated fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Between: Occ. Agriculture' KanaYaPallY {rfil.i}&.*1'{f,:?'Sl} fi :1 H'Y [{,? fi h #&'3' J'?3[:' .ApPellanUGlaimant o*?n" special Deputy corector, Raiiv Lift rrrigation Scheme-phase-,, pebbair' ResgondenUResPondent Counsel for the APPellant Counsel for the ResPondent : Sri. V Manohar Rao : GP for APPeals Appear under section 54 0f L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'201(i in o'P No'252 of 2015 on the fite of the court of the senior civir Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between: i,T.T,.,'i ]illl; il: #fi iilX?oifl f;f3, Jfi ars, occ As ri cur tu re, Ka n a ya pa r r y Vi r ras e AND ..AppellanUClaimant The sper:iar Deputy cortector, Rajiv Lift tnigation scheme_phase_il, pebbair . RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals Appear under section 54 0f L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'2016 i, o P'No'254 of 2015 on the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: [.i,l3i[iil ,"; ,jxff ],[i i; f,%i i t [?fi :i, Occ- Agriculture, Kanayapaily Village of , AND ...AppellanUCtaimant The speciar Deputy coilector, Rajiv Lift trrigation scheme_ phase_ ,, pebbair .. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appeltant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals TIVf,d Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.265 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: G_q1Ogm.ma, Wo.Yellanna, Age 76 years, Occ. Agricutture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanapartny Di'stria. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift Inigation Scheme-phase-.1 1, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.192 ol 2o1 s on the fire of the court of the senior civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. [11[3L?""',fi;,[??1il]?";3;rii]!inll?r o"'Asricurture' Kasavaparrv Virrase or AND ..AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- phase- ll, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri.VManoharRao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 778 oF 2025 App,eal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.201,5 in O.P.No.260 ot 20'15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \Nanaparthy. K. Pedda Ramulu, S/o.Naganna, Age 66 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND I-IISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 779 oF 2025 Appe;rl under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.266 oI 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Saroja, W/o.Krishnaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Koth'akota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' ...ResPondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 780 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.267 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Maddileti,, S/o.Yellanna, Age 41 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair Respondent ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 781 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.199 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Yadaiah, s/o.chinna _chinnaiah, Age .36_yea1s, occ. Agriccrture, Kana yapafiy Village of Kothakota Manoil, W;h;p"r;rhy DiJtnct. vvv' "\ AND ...AppellanUClaimant The speciar Deputy corector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme_phase_r, pebbair . ResiondenURes pondent counser for the Appefiant : sri. v Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals DAC UISITION Appreal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.253 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at rNanaparthy. Between: Ramestr, S/o.Narsimha, Age 36 years, Kothakcta Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapal ly Village of D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...ResPondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals D TION FIRS T APP NO: 783 0F 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L A Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 irr O.P.No.181 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY.

1. J. S. Chandraiah (died), Per LRs'2 to 6 2. J. Bhagyamma, w/o Late J' S' Chandraiah' aged 63 years' a. ,. *"n..".' s/o Late J S' Chandraiah' aged 49 years' I i.,. trir.n., s/o Late J' S Chandraiah' aged 43years' S. L. O"n"i"t, s/o Late J S' Chandraiah' aged 39years' ; ;#rfi iliffi,"';:: l* j"1i *:la:' w:* :,:{f;iB'?i"t Ag ricu rtu re R"/o .Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector' Raiiv Lift I rrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' .ResPondenURespondent counsel for the APPellants Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals : Sri. V Manohar Rao E] OF Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.208 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Ravi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Age 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated '10.03.2016 in O.P.No.194 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Bharathi, D/o.Naganna, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. I ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy Collector, (Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals The Court deliyered the following: I t \ T]FIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THID HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.Nos. 728.729. 73O. 731. 732,733.734.. 735, 736. 743. 744. 745. 746. 747. 74a- 755 7 737- 73A- 739- 74o- 74r- 742- 75L 752 1

773. 774- 775- 776. 777 - 774. 779 -7aO- 7Ar and 785 OF 2925 77L 7A2.783. 7A4 i per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili) \Vhen the matters are taken up for hearing, learned couns()l appearing for the appellants had informed the Court that the issue involved in the present Appeals is squarely covered by the common judgment, dated 29 .O4 .'.1,O2 5, . re.ndered ,,by this Court in L.A.A. S. No.57 of 2024 & batch and following the said common judgrnent, the pret;ent Appeals also deserves to be allowed. a

2. Le,arned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent-Special Deputy Collector did not dispute r-he said fact.

3. In view of the same, all these appeals are allowecl following the common judgment, dated 29.O4.2025, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.57 of 2024 & batch, -) +- and the market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with erll consequential benefits. However, it is made clear that the appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR I 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. (With records, if 3ny) 2. One CC to Sri. V Manohar Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Appeals, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 4. Two CD CoPies DUPSL HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 COMMON JUDGMENT ALLOWING At.L THE APPEALS ,' q v HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BT.F' SMTJUSTICE TIRUMAIJ. DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.Nos.57, 8L and 124 OF 2024 COMMON JUDGMENT i (per Hon'bb J utic Abbirund ktnar S bauiti) When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellants had informed this Court that the issue raised in these Appeals is sqqarely covered by the judgment, dated 27 .01,.2025, passed by thigi, Court in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024. -. .l Learned counsel. had further contended that L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024 was filed by claimant No.26 in O.P.No.91 of 201,4, dated

03.'10.201,8 and the appellants herein other claimants in ^re O.P.No.91 of 201,4. Therefore, similar order be passed in these appeals also. Learned counsel had further contended that LAAS , No.49 of 2024 was disposed of by relying on a Division Bench iudgment of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.125 6f 2915 and batch, dated 27.09.2022, whereby the market value of the land acquired therein was enhanced by r*ro more times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer with all consequential benefits, 2 however, for the delay period in preferring the appeals, the claimants are flot entitled for any interest.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants had further contended that the jtrdgment, dated 27.09.2022 passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch was also confirmed by the Apex Court in S.L.P.(Civi)No.28925 of 2024, dated L7.09.2024. Therefore, the present appeals can also be disposed of in terms of the iudgment, dated 27 .01.2025 passed in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1" respondent-Land Acquisition Officer had contended that the purpose of acquiring lands of appellants is for Ryalampadu Balancing t'.eservoir under Jawahar Litt Irrigation Project and .a Priyadarshi,furala Proiect and G.O.N'Is.No.234, dated 15.10. 1,993 and G.O.Ms.No.291, dated 05.08.1982 ate not applicable to the said irrigatio:r projects. Therefore, all the appeals are liable to be dismissed. J

4. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either sicie, this Court is of the view that the Division Bench of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.2 of 201,6, dated 27.09.2022 aird L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, dated 1'5.09.2022 held that the said G.Os. are applicable for all the Irrigation Projects, and though the said G.Os. were issued specifically for Srisailam Hydro Power Projects. L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch, dated 27.09.2022 and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201.6, dated 1,5.09.2022 were allowed and the market value was enhanced by two more times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Aggrieved by the order, dated

27.09.2022, in L.A.A.S.No.1,25 of 201,5 and batch, the State has carried the matter to the Apex Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No. 28925 of 2024 and the Apex Court uide order, datdd 1,7.09.2024, ) confirmed th'e order passed b1, the Division Bench of this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch. Therefore, the present appeals c^n also be disposed of in terms of the judgment, dated

27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch. 4

5. -A.ccordingly, all the appeals are allorved by following the judgment, dated 27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch, :rnd the market value is enhanced by rwo more times (1+z) than ttLe value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer with all consequential benefits. However, the appellants are not entitled for interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals. There shall be no order as to costs. M,scellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed. JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI , JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Date:29.04.2r')25 Note: Regrst4'to annex <opy o€the iudgment dated 27 09.2022 In tAAS No.125 cf 2015. @.o) rkk/Prat i I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOUISITION AP SUIT NO: 728 OF 2025 Between: Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota tvlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10'03'2016 in O.P.No.204 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. ., This appear coming on for hearing and' upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Judgm'ent and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and Gp for Appeats for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows: 1

3. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the varue fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with ail consequentiar benefits; That apperant be and hereby is not entired to interest for the deray period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DUPSL SD'.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER a I -"il-.i:F+f 1 !,1i w' t ! :., t HIGH COURT DATED:26|Otll2o25 DECREE LAAS NO: 728 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOUISITION SUIT NO: 729 OF 202s Between: Q.Radha, Wo.Laxmanna, Age 4_! years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.136 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruqjng the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2- That the [Varket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CEt CoPies DL/PSL * SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , J*..€.Y:&, ., d' w 4 ..t,, !' aI I a *.f , HIGH COURT DATED:26l08tir-025 DECREE LAAS NO:729 OF 2O2S ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ r,\ t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE VAK]TI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISIT]ON APPEAL SUIT NO: 730 OF 2025 Between: J. Gouthami @ Jyoti, D/o. Prasad, Age 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri./o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme -Phase- ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.210 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and.upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in I the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2- That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the deray period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL ) d +i!.f":-.Fr n w , I .a' -, 1..'f HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 730 OF 2O2s ALLOWNG THE APPEAL r.^ ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU lSlTlON APPEAL SUIT NO: 731 OF 2O2s Between Yerramma Kothakota , D/o.Naganna Mandal, Wana , Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanaya parthy District. pally Village of lanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.1B4 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and thl material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri..V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. --7 //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD,Copies DUPSL # SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER ,a 4 "a--fTKat $.t' w ) ,i I a). l',. .,-.. t HIGH COIJRT DATED:2€ilOBI2O2S DECREE LAAS NO: 7it1 OF 2O2S ALLOWING THE APPEAL .A ,. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND ixe nououRABLE sRIJUSTIcE vAKlrl RAMAKRISHNA REDDY N IT 732 7n Between: Buddamma, Wo.Yellanna' Village of Kothakota Mandal Age 71 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally , WanaparthY District ...AppellanUClaimant D TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase-ll'Pebbair' ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016ino.P.No.246ot2ol5onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil Judge, at WanaParthY' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusillg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri' V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; 3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod of 3363 days in preferring the appeal' 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DUPSL & s JOINT REGTSTRAR G SECTION OFFICER a ^,r- f::.iii -{. # I HIGH COUR'I' DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 732OF 2o2s ALLOWING THE APPEAL h ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY SUIT NO F20 Between:

1. Chandraiah, S/o.Naganna, Age 56 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Kanayapally 2. J.Naveen, S/o.Narsimha, age 44 years Both Occ. Agriculture, Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Rl/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants ntlD The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.24O of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth.Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by fwo more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellants be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CDr Copies DL/PSL s- SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER , -f,I.-16l 'I w ) !r HIGH COUR DATED:2610t 12025 DECREE LAAS NO: 733 OF 2025 ALLOWING T}IE APPEAL )t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 7340F 2025 Ramulu, S/o.Chandraiah, Age 37 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCIaimant o The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lifl lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ' ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated '10.03.2016 in O.P.No.174 oI 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD tlopies DL/PSL s SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , .f t1, *y.:r,:1[r t' n w I :{, HIGH COURT DATED:26/0ll/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 734 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ^f , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY APPEAL SUIT NO: 735 OF 20 N.Naganna, D/o.Balaiah , Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal' wanaparthy District ...A',ELLANT(S) The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RESPONDENTS Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.182 ot 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That thei Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of3363 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CI) Copies DL\PSL & SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , i ^rF-{r:{! !\ w a i i5' ;,, HIGH COURT DATED:26,tOBt2O2S DECREE LAAS NO: 735 OF 2O2S ALLOWING TI{E APPEAL \ , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND IIE APPEAL SU lT NO:736 OF 2025 Between: Naresh, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 37 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o'Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant o The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.2o3 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, at WanaparthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not erititled to interest for the delay period of 3363 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. / //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Sopies DUPSL P SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , t .dF.r:ff:qfo : '' '' i' n \' a&' w I :{ ,, "Yji .r I HIGH COURT DATED:26108,12025 DECREE LAAS NO: 736 OF 2O2s ALLOWIN'G THE APPEAL \ J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQ UISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 737 OF 2025 Between: Rani, D/o.Narsimlu, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.135 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perus[g the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3363 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. , //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL w SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFTCER t r ---- ,} -F i?:.:-..rir .-a- t s , ;'i HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 737'OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ -{ ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU ISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 738 OF 2025 Between: Elishamma. D/o.Karrenna, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Dishict. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.178 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rr.fng the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Dec ree as follows:

1. That the.appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3363 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DUPSL & SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08,r2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 73tl OF 2025 ALLOWING TI{E APPEAL t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D urslTto 1T NO: 7 J. Chinna Kurmaiah, S/o. Yena Kistanna, Age 48 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fi/o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- Il' Pebbair ...AppellanUClaimant ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.211 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruqng the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3363 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER /ffRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior.Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD C<lpies DL\PSL t I 4F-1-:9-,:*it ,1 i\ 'w fup" , I ,:'. ) HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/1!025 DECREE LAAS NO: 739 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAM HNA REDDY D ITN OF Between J. Balaiah, s/o.chinna Kistanna, Age 55 years, occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' ...RESPONDENTS AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.207 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perysing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That ihe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer' with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3363 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. l l -_----- t To, //TRUE COPYII SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DUPSL $j. , n ^F:rfi=* # , ftt, i:'i HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 740 OF 2025 ALLOWING ThIE APPEAL n IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU ITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 741 OF 2025 n !-("ignlrg, P/o.Naganna, Age 4Q years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ntID The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated

10.03.2016 in O.P.No.140 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perushg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court helow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not eniitled to interest for the delay period of3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies DUPSL *}- sD/'K?#xIt?+[iR 6 SECilON OFFTCER I I "f"r'.f fl fua' w , x.i. ' HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/21025 DECREE LAAS NO:741 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL $ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE NT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABH]NAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRISHNA REDDY NO: Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 43 years, Occ. Ri/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mand'al, Wanap'arthy bistrict. Agriculture, ..AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.200 ot 2o1s on the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusin! the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitlbd to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. -7 //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copiers DL\P SL w SD/.KSRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTTON OFFICER , "r'..lxl .1.' I s ){ j. .r; HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 742OF 2025 ALLOW]NG THE APPEAL .d ,/ c I I i I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI TfIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D TI IT 43 J.Nagamma, Wo.Narsimlu. Ag.e 61 .years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wandpa"rthy Oiltrirt.' - --' ' ="-' D ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy coilector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation Scheme-phase-il, pebbair. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.201 6 in o.p.No.1 34 of 201 s on the file of the court of the senior civir Judge, at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusingf the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court bersw and the materiar papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That ttre Mlrket varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appelrant be and hereby is not entitfd to interest for the deray period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,/ ,/ -- //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Cil'il Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD CoPies DUPSL *y SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER ) 4 .f. d:.r*t 'h .,i # , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 743 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY INAND KUMAR SHAVILI LAND ACOUtStTIo APPEAL SU 1T NO: 744 zi/rs n Chittemma, Wo.Premaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phaseil, Pebbair' ..,Res pondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.243 0t 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirrg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon .hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. .The

1. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL L , t!t f-ir..":+"1 n 1 a,e' w I r:i j HIGH COURT oATEO;26108t2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 744 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .( , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY lSlTlON APPEAL SUIT NO: 745OF Kranthi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Age 28 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.206 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and th9 material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CD CoPies DUPSL , I -:-f;35 .t' ,t s* w )q t:, HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 LAAS NO: 745 OF 202s ALLOWING THE APPEAL t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE VAKtTt RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY OF Between R-.. Venkalqmma, .W{g e.Ogrll.a, Age..61_y'eap, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Dstrict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase -lt, pebbair. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.175 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit Judge, at Wanaparthy. ... RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusi,rg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court bglow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: ,

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2- That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entltled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,7 //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Serior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , tI JF-rf'ir* r' I ea'w I HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 746 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE .APPEAL \ , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOUISITION APP SUIT NO: 747 OF 2025 n Ravi, S/o. Yellanna, r Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture, Ri/o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.24B ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Ofiicer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, 't. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DUPSL * SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER a t "-:+4:s*it -r- : .t .t-, n l'i s , t; , T1 ',- | HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/:2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 747 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRTJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITIO N APPEAL SUIT NO: 748OF 2025 Between: Balamma, Wo.Ashanna, Age 81 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.172 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusigg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD C:opies DL/PSL & SD/-KSRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , n -F:,4:'ait t.. ,{ tut' w , + ':' t HIGH COURT DArED:26lOBl.2o2s DECREE LAAS NO: 74A OF 2O2s ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ I Y ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQ UISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 749 OF 2025 Between: Venkatesh, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigqtion Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. Respondent. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.245 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1.. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CE) Copies DL/PSL , n $"la' w a,| L; HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/21025 DECREE LAAS NO: 749 OF 2025 ALLOWING T}IE APPEAL h \\,r , : IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D Between: Manemma, Wo.Balaiah, Age 71-.y9?r9, Occ. Agricutture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota'[\Iandal, Wanaparthy District' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ... Res pondenUResponde nt Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.p.No.16B of 2015 on the file of the Ccurt of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. , This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal' 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL , n ,Ff:-;{ .l i- w , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/11025 DECREE LAAS NO: 750 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \1 fr\t/ Y( , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU ITION APPEAL SUIT NO 751 0F 2025 Between: Shantha, D/o. Karrenna, Age 36 years, Occ: Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.180 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruslhg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V f\Ianohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. k //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD C;opies DL/PSL g SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR c SECTION OFFICER , ( ,F.f-rtl. l'! ds' B , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812'025 DECREE LAAS NO: 751 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE: APPEAL \ {.lr ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAV]LI AND THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU lSlTlON APPEAL SUIT NO: 752OF 2025 Between: J.Mashanna, S/o.Balaiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA. Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair,. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.133 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD'.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies DL/PSL I n &' n I ,ee w HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 752 CtF 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .,\.( , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAK]TI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 753 OF 2025 Between: Shanthamma, Wo.Balaiah, Age 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. Respondent ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.205 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in I the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. -7 //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C;opies DL/PSL nD- SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER , I{ f".rFs------------rE! i* *r-

6.?,B , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 , DECREE LAAS NO: 753 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .{ )I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:754OF 2025 Dass, S/o.Naganna, Age 42 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.'|83 oI 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusrtg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court b.elow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

1. The Sen or Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL , n .-*f..:a'+;{ ,{-4 w , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 754OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL h , , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 755 OF 2025 Between: Chandra Babu, S/o.Balaiah, Age 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District- ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.171 of 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaparthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon Perusip9 the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent- This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the detay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. 7 //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Ccpies DL/PSL w h,, ! i' I i l t: i: SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6- SECTION OFFICER , d "4'EIE*a n d"&' w ) ,&, ,:r, ,tir.. HIGH COURT DATED:2610812'025 DECREE LAAS NO: 755 OF 2025 ALLOWING THIE APPEAL 11 , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY LAND ITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 756 OF 2025 Between: Ramulu, S/o. Yellanna, Age 49 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Kanayapally Village oiKothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair ...RESPONDENTS Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.247 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil Judge, at WanaParthY' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirp the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: i. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Seni,rr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL s- SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER , I -F -#r* "t l'r ,{ d.&' w I t, ,,, ,/ , HIGH COURT DATED:261081202s DECREE LAAS NO: 756 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D rsrTroN NO: 757 O n Rajani, D/o.Satyanna, Age 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. Respondent .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated '10.03.2016 in O.P.No.179 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. ! This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, rriith all consequential benefits;

1. . The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CEr Copies DL/PSL D \ t! ,.fx.4r#*6, "t", : * d' w , :,: s &,. ' $l'j HIGH COURT DATED:26108l,2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 757 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL h , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRTJUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQ UISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:758 oF 2025 Between: of Kothakota Mandal, Wandpa"rtny Oi'rari"t.' --" .''"'" Manemma, Wo.Kondanna. Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village AND ...AppellanUClaimant The special Deputy coflector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-il, pebbair Appeal under Section b4 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.238 ot 2015 on the fire of the court of the senior civir Judge, at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusin$ the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the airpellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; 3' That apperrant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Serrior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL I / , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812()25 DECREE LAAS NO: 758 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE: APPEAL \ ]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAK]TI RAMAKR]SHNA REDDY LAND rslTto N FIRST APPEAL NO:759 0F 2025 [3lilffli"t,1:1119:ilffiS9?ri,t',:,?rs' occ Asricurture' Kanavaparrv Vilase or D ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy corrector, LA, Rajiv Lift rrigation scheme-Aase-l, pebbair. Appeal under Section s4 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.19'r of 201s on the file of the court of the Senior civir Judge, at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusingpthe grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That apperrant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the deray period of 3357 days in prefering the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senicr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C;opies DL\PSL ** SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , d 1 "F.-#1:'--gt .ts, n # w , H HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/202s DECREE LAAS NO: 759,CF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL n f, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRlrr.Xffi ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACoUIS]TION FI RST APPEAL NO: 760 OF 2025 Between: J.Murali, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 44 years' Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy collector, LA, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenUResPondent AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016 in o.P.No.251 0f 2015 0n the file of the court of the senior civil Judge, at WanaparthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. I This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herlcy is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ) .j J --7 To, SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C)opies DL\PSL &L , \ a .Fr*q$r?s 4 *' n ,e ds' w , ,* ..'t. ls,r. :.?i'.'i HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 DECREE LAAS NO: 760 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE: APPEAL q ,/ .'---= l:"1 , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: Shanthamma, W/o. Pedda Ramulu, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ... Res pondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.261 of 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusipg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows: 1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value .' fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies DL\PSL W SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , i I I i I l *t f@ -.r 1,' #. w , ,l ,. ". .,i: . ; t / a HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 761 OtF 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL 1"1 IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY Between: Naresh,S/o.ChinnaChinnaiah,Age44years,occ.Agriculture,Kanayapally villase ot rotnat<oiJ M;;d;[ winafiarthv tjistrict' ...APPellanUGlaimant AND The Special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' "ResPondenUResPondent AppealunderSection54ofL'A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated

10.03.2016ino.P.No.197of2015onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil Judge, at WanaParthY' Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponper:usingthegroundsof appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below andltfre material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri' v Manohar Rao' Advocate for the appellant and GF for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value '' fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is no-t entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeat' 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' i I i I //TRUE COPYII SD/.KSRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Sernior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

2. Two Cll Copies DL\PSL 8- , i I I I I i I i l I : , d -Fdt?*{g 6e w , $ ,5, .. tr' j , . ,',-- / !. ,/ ,' HIGH COURT DATED:26 t$gl2o25 DECREE LAAS NO: 762 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE. APPEAL I i i .I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 763 OF 2025 Between: Bala t\Ianemma, Wo.Venkataiah, Age 46 years, Occ.Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, LA Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phasb-ll, Pebbair. . RespondenURespondent Appeal,under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.185 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruspg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [\Ianohar Rao, Advocate for the appetlant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFTCER - //TRUE COPYII To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies DL\PSL w , d (|.-..aiFltr€{ :,; i ,, t Atr w , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 763 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE: APPEAL \ , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 764 OF 202s Between: Venu, S/o.Savaraiah, Age 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.250 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon p"rr.#g the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed i 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.KSRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL , t i\ , Nt w "i. -.t:f. l HIGH COURT DATED:26lOAl2'.025 DECREE LAAS NO: 764 OF 202s ALLOWING THIE APPEAL t^ ,) !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITI ON FIRST APPE AL NO: 765 0F 2025 Between: J.Naoanna, S/o.Balaiah, Age 71 years, Occ' Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothikota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigiationScheme-Phase.ll,Pebbair. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated l0.03.2016ino.P.No.190of2015onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil Judge, at WanaParthY. I This appeal coming on for hearing and. upon perusing the grounds of appeal,theJudgmentandDecreeoftheCourtbelowandthematerialpapersin the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod of 3358 days in preferring the appeal' 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL w SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , I ^F";*{e.**E ,)a- n 6"31 w , fi' Jer HIGH COURT DATED:261081',2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 765 OF 2025 ALLOWING THIE APPEAL \ )\/h .l\ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 766 OF 2025 Between: Renuka, D/o.Naganna, Age 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota fVlandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair ... RespondenURes ponde nt Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.193 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V f\/anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. ,, This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ---------------7 ,/ SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C)opies DL\PSL & , : d f-€?*fl n AB w , ,# . rt:J a HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 766 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 767 OF 2025 Between: p.y.brahm-qlyam, s/o-chandr?!?h, Age.41_years, occ- Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeltanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-lt, Pebbair. . RespondenURes pondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.264 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusifig the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon l'learing the arguments of Sri. V fManohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the tt/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not ent[tled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. -7 //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior (livil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Collies DL\PSL & SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR a- SECTION OFFICER ) I q;"qiIs "{ n * c}} w , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 767 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION F]RST APPEAL NO: 768 OF 2025 Between: Narender, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 3Q years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ...RespondenUResponent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.19B of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies DL\PSL w 'I I I SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , d "r":*qm:*q { & 'Y. E .., , ,r, fs' w , I I t HIGH COURT DATE D : 26 10812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 768 OF 2025 ALLOWING TI{E APPEAL \"1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 769 OF 2025 Between: Mahender, S/o. Yellanna, Age 46 year, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota [\Iandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenUResponent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.258 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruig the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decr.ee as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That thi Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3360 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senirtr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Oopies DL\PSL W SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFICER I d tf.+*:fl*t 11 A8 Mrl, ) l€, HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 769 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL , tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 770 OF 202s Between: Ramachandraiah, S/o.Yellanna, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota lVlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.256 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon O"rrr,6n the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows' .1

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2')than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3360 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO -_. JOINT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFICER ,/TRUE COPY/ To, The Senior C;ivil Judge at Wanaparthy' 1

2. Two CD CoPies DL\PSL & ., d x "r$rnt ,t d.pjtr , ,\ .. ^{.. -'; / HIGH COURT DATED:26108120125 DECREE LAAS NO: 770 Oj: 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL , IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQU lSlTlON FIRST APPEAL NO: 771 OF 2025 Between: Buchamma, Wo.Chandraiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Agriculture, Kanayapally ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector LA, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ..Respondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.263 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusiig the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed i 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Ofiicer, with all consequential benefits:

3. That appellant be and hereby is not eniitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ------7 SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR C //TRUE COPYII To, SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL M I i f-rr3,.:*g n

6.& w a & G. HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/202:5 DECREE LAAS NO: 771 CtF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL P' :tA u\r- ) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:.772OF 2025 Between: Salamma, Wo.Pedda Ramulu, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme LA Phase ll Pebbair. Respondent ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.262 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and. upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in I the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. 7 //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL *> SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGTSTRAR G SECTION OFFICER , T d ^FF.t';1*,.4i1 n {h" k, -i ) I l I I I , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/2021i DECREE LAAS NO: 772OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUIS ITIoN FIRST APPEAL NO: 773 OF 2025 Between: J.Chinna Savaraiah, S/o.Navuraiah, Age 78 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.249 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusfrg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court b.elow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. fhalthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of3360 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G To, SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senic,r Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C:opies DL\PSL W ) HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/:2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 773 OF 2O2S ALLOWING THE APPEAL , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 774 OF 2025 Between: J.Narsimha, S/o.Mashanna, Age of Kothakota tVlandal, Wanaparth 66 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village y District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.252 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusjng the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon.hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3360 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL ) n f-o'.i",,fi, -- ,* e&' w , :) _.,

1.. ' r , HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/20:25 DECREE LAAS NO: 774 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL rN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE-IT-ATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH qAY OF AUGUST Two rHousArtrD AND TwENTY FlvE PRESENT THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY Between fVlahesh, S/o. Narsimha, Age 31^years' iifi ;"k;i"-rrrr a no i r, w an"a p a rtr v D i stri ct' Occ- Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of ..AppellanUClaimant AND TheSpecialDeputyCollector,RajivLiftlrrigationScheme-Phase.ll,Pebbair. ...ResPonde nUResPondent AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActagainsttheJudgmentandDecreedated 10.03.2016ino'P.No.254of2ol5onthefileoftheCourtoftheSeniorCivil Judge, at WanaParthY' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perdsing the grounds of appeal,theJudg.mentandDecreeoftheCourtbelowandthematerialpapersin thecaseanduponhearingtheargumentsofSri.VManoharRao,Advocateforthe appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That'the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequentialbenefits;

3.Thatappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelayperiod of 3364 days in preferring the appeal' 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL * SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER I i I n .a'_#,.I**! .'' ,d s ) .t F.. l:,,'i HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 DECREE LAAS NO: 775 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ ,) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D rJl NO: F G-q1Ogm.mg, Wo.Yellanna, ASg 7q.yg?T, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapaily Viflage of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy Diitrict.' AND AppellanUClaimant The special Deputy coilector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-11, pebbair. Appeal under section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.265 ot 2o1s on the file of the court of the Senior civir Judge, at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirlg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with ail consequentiar benefits; 3' That appellant be and hereby is not entitied to interest for the deray period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SR!NIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD ,lopies DL/PSL .) d f..r::.*t u^- .*a a i;)' 3tt, tt' , ;l " ,?: i;.,.: . ,'', f "/ ,.' HIGH COURT DATED:26108120115 DECREE LAAS NO: 776 CtF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D N OF Between Kishore, S/o. Naganna, Age 34 years, Occ Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme- Phase- ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.192 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in I the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3364 days in prefening the appeal. 4. Thdt there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOlNT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD,lopies DL\PSL n .f .-f"a..ri, ..,.: * *., ASB , HIGH COURT DATED:26108120125 DECREE LAAS NO: 777 CtF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .I , i. I i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ISITION FIRST APPEAL NO:778 oF 2025 Between: K. Pedda Ramulu, S/o.Naganna, Age 66 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.260 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusin! the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent: This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitied to interest for the delay period of 3364 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL/PSL )I { -.6" itr>aii{ n 4!4 ;,i4Y w ) HIGH COURT DATE D : 26 1081202s DECREE LAAS NO: 778 OF 2025 ALLOWING THIE APPEAL t1 q \ ,( IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND rNE HOruOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUI SITION FIRST APPEAL NO:779 OF 2025 Between: Saroja, W/o.Krishnaiah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota lMandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.266 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruEing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the bppeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3364 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ; I I !, )i -7 SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL ,) n 't $.fi 1* {. ) HIGH COURT DATED:26l08l20it'5 DECREE LAAS NO: 779 OF 2025 ALLOWING]'HE APPEAL \ a i ,/ T , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACOU FIRST APPEAL NO 780 0F 2025 Between: Maddileti, S/o.Yellanna, Age 41 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. Respondent ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.267 ol 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. , This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SDI.K.SRINIVASA RAO -_ JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER /TRUE COPY/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD OoPies DL\PSL ) E t fl."Tr1g .r. * ftw.{inrewIry , HIGH COURT DATED:26lOBl2'025 DECREE LAAS NO: 780 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .f \ , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 781 OF 2025 Between: Yadaiah, S/o.Chinna Chinnaiah, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.199 of 2O15 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruslng the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CID Copies DL\PSL M SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER a ,{F_faY:Ai . *-\ w, b& , HIGH COURT DATED:2610812'.025 DECREE LAAS NO: 781 OF 202s ALLOWING TI.IE APPEAL 1 ,) !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITTON FIRST APPEAL NO: 782 OF 2o2s Between: Ramesh, S/o.Narsimha, Age 36 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.253 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusifig the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the€ppeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. n //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cr>pies DL\PSL E SD/.K.SR]NIVASA RAO JOlNT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER , n ^F',|of,",I -z-' i .t. t s#j w a , ,./ ) HIGH COURT DATED:26l0gl2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 782 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE: APPEAL L1 Fr IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND lstTlo FIRST APPEAL NO: 783 OF 20,B J. S. Chandraiah (died), Per LRs.2 to 6 J. Bhagyamma, w/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 63 years' J. Naganna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 49 years, J. Sayanna, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 43 years, J. Danaiah, s/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 39 years, Chittemma, d/o Late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 38 years, Occ. Agriculture' Fi/o. Kanayapally Village, Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants

6. D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent ,. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in o.P.No.181 0I 2015 0n the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon pergsing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times ('1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period of3357 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no orderas to costs. SD/.K.SRINIVASA JOINT RE To, SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD ()opies DL\PSL a n f-*.it1 F ,+i 'B* ) HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/:2025 DECREE LAAS NO: 783OF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ \X' a t'j I I j i I l 1 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR, THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY D FIRST i7840F n Ravi Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Village of Kothakota Mandal 4g.e 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o.Kanayapally Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated '10.03.2016 in O.P.No.208 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. , This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Nlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD ()opies DL\PSL .] I f .fjls .i h ,a

6.&' w , I a HIGH COURT DATED:26/08/202s DECREE LAAS NO: 784 CrF 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENW SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAV]LI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 785 OF 2025 Bharathi, D/o.Naganna, Age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, (Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A.Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2016 in O.P.No.194 ot 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in I the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 3358 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. / //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL\PSL SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR G SECT]ON OFFICER , HIGH COURT DATED:26t}OtzLi|s DECREE LAAS NO: 78S OF :2025 ALLOWING THE APT'EAL a 5rl o

Find similar cases Start drafting free

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments