High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WR lT PETITION NO: 25436 OF 2025 Between: Gomasa Srinivas, S/o. Raia Lingu, Age. 45 Years, Occ. Private Works, R/o. H. No' 1-'134, Batwanpally Village, Bellampally Mandal, Mancherial District ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to the Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Ramagundam Commissionerate, Ramagundam Proper and Mandal, Peddapalli District.

3. The Station House Officer, Tandur Police Station, Tandur, Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District.

4. Bandi Mallesh, S/o. Rajesham, Age.60 Years, Occ. Business, Ri9 H.\9,.3- 1ril4, Pullimadugu Vill'age, Thimirapur Mandal' Mancherial District. Cell No' 9502919986.

5. Bandi Sagar, S/o. IVlallesh, Age. 35 Years, Occ Business, R/o H No 3- f,ii4, euilimadugu Village, Thimmapur Mandal, Mancherial District. Cell No. 9502919986 -

6. Chandanagiri Srinivas, S/o. Rajaiah, Ag9, 55 Y-ears, Occ., Vempally Village, Mancherial Mahdal and District' Cell No. 8886780808' 7. Sudha Bhaskar, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner, Ag9' 60. Y9a.r1 O99 ArJin"ti, R/o. Gadderagadi Village, Mandamarri Mandal, Mancherial District, Cell No. 868840238. -B-usinesi, R/o ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to get settle I /-/ the monetary issues as per the dictates of the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 under his monitor ship, otherwise petitioner has to face dire conseq I rnces in his hands by saying that, he will implicate the petitioner in false crimir rl cases, the same is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative : principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the c. stitutron of lndia and depriving the personal liberties of the petitioner. ccr sequently direct the respondent No. 3 not to harass and not to call the petitior t r to the police station and not to deprive the personal liberties of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 151 cPC praying that in the c i cumstances stated rn the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High cou t may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3, not to harass and not to cal the petitioner to the police station, thereby not to threaten him to get setfle the s;ues with respondent Nos.4 to 7 as dtctated by hrm. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : ASST. Gp FOR HO tlE Counsel for the Respondents No.4to7 : The Court made the following: ORDER * ? a a i a a * a t f t, / - THE HONOUT{AI}LE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SI{RAVAN KUMAI{ WITIT PETITION No.25436 of 2025 ORDER: Hcarcl Iearned counsel for the petitioner ancl Sri M.Srinivas, learnctl \ssistant Covernmcnt Plcader for Horne appcaring for respondent Nos.1 to 3 \\'ith thcir conse nt, this \^,rit petition is bcing taken up for disposal at t[-re .rclrnission stage itsclf 2 'l lris writ pctition has been filerl seekinl3 the iol[or.t'irr11 pra\ L'r - "to rlt'tktrt lfu nctiou of tlu resytorulent No.3 in caLLittg tlu pttitittntr to tln' yolicc slnlio:t tntl lltrentcning liru Io gel s(Illr tlp tlo t'ttnl Lssuts as per Llu rltclrtlcs of tlu' responderLt Nos.4 lo 7 untler ltis nutnttttrslnp, otirrit,tst pttiftttnt'r hts to t'tt'e dlrc consequcncas in lis hurtls hy saying tlnt, he uril ttltplt.ilL, tl:1, pt'liliotu;r in lalse crininal ctscs, tlp sttntc is nothing l)tl urbtlntrtl, illtgnl, ru l tntl t,Ltid tnd t,ictltrlttt' 0.1 l)fl ctlilcs oi tt,ttttntl jr;sliL. tttl tlsLt t'alnlit,r: ol ArLrcltts 74 t1111 2.1 of thc t.onstittttton of lrulut tn,l rlL'ltnt,trLg tlu, pL,rsourl ltltcrlies of tl:|t' l1ehtrc11er. CLtttstr:utn tly rhrctt llrt' r(sponLle t No.3 rrol to lnrnss and not to u\l tlu petitioner tLt tlu' polict slaliotL and not to deprhte tlu personal libcrti:s of tlrc pctitioner." llriel hcts st.rtL'd in this wlit petrtion:rre tltat lhe pelition('r u5r'Ll t().lc[ .rs a Iraisorr rn sclling and purchasing the lands. It is furthcr stated that thror,rgh.r rncrliator, the rcspondent Nos..l to 7 catne to knor.r' the petitioner anrl takirrg advantagc of acquaintancc with pctitioner, the respondent Nos.4 Lo 7, cntcrcrl into an agreement trf sale of land anci by creating talsc arrd I.rbricatecl clocuurcnt hacJ obtained monr:y. Ihe casc of the petitioncr is lhat at r.h,-'instJlrcc of rt'sponclent Nos.-l to 7, responclerrt No.3 is calling thc prt,titiorrer to thc politc station antl tlrrc.rtenulg him to p;r_1'.r suin o[ lis.20,00,()00/ - to ttre r(,s f)on(l('r'l t Nos..1 to 7. Aggrievcd bv LIrc sanre, this rvrit petition is tilecl -/ v \ '1. [-calnccl .,\ssistanl (]overnnreut Pleader for [] I nc appearint fol resp()ndcnt Ncrs I trr 3 frlacc.l ol-r record instructions issLl -' lbv Sub- [ nsf-rt c to r of Polrcc. I'.rntlrir ['olitt'Stariort, Manchr-rial District, u'lli r ,in it rs statcrl that thc rt,spolr.iorrt \o I is noi irrterfcring in civil disputes [,e ' .'ccn tht,pctition(.r ancl tlrr: unofficial r(,sp,)ncl('r'rt Nos.{ to 7 lL is further stalt t i 11.1 t the unol.[icral rcspondcr.rts har i' n<rt apprroachocl the respondent No.3-pr I cc s ta tiolr ancl h.tcl Itot nr.rclt .r.r\ ( ()r'npl.ri11[ .rgainst the petitioner. As su: r, tlre rltrostiort rri calling thc I)etili()n('r t() Lh( P()li.c statitln ancl thre;rteti i r' him lo scttlc the rr()nL.tJrv issLros rr rth lhc rcspontlt-'rtt. Nos.4 to 7 docs rLr t arise. It is l.Ltrtltcr statc(l that Ilrt) r'r'sportrlcltt No.3 r-rcithc'r fotced nor prcssr r zecl the 1.rc titiotrt r to sottlc thc civil iiis1r1111'

5. Rt'cor tlin;,, tlrt. sLrtrrrrissror',s rraclc b1' learnecl c(rr t scl appearin;1 on crtht,r sicic.'rrrtl r., rtlrorrt ('\|rL)ssirlo anv opinion on thc ttrtr ts of tlrr. cast,tlrrs '"r,r'it pr.litiorr i,. (lt\l)()s(.(l ot rlircctinll the respondent au[hr r ties io 1c,l]ps1,,1.," procL.ss as crrntt'rnpl.rtL'rl unrlor larr, betore initiating anv acl r1-l on pctitioncr

6. \Vith lhi .riror c tlirt'ction, this rvrit petition IS disprp5pll 111 l\lisccllarrr.r,rrs.rl)l,li(,rli,)ns. il .:r-,t pcrtr{ing,shall stand clo;r cl No ortk,r as to To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.I ASS I. JAWAHAR REDDY ISTANT REGTSTRAR / .i/ SECTION OFFICER 'i . The Principal Secretary to the Home Department, Secre .ariat Buildings, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2, The Commissioner of Police, Ramagundam Commissirl ,erate, Ramagundam Proper and Mandal, Peddapalli District. _.-!if_ * * E , f / * W I lrlandal, Mancherial District.

3. The Station House Officer,.Tandur police Station, Tandur, Tandur Village and 4 One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate. tOpUCl 5.. Two CCs to GP FOR HOIUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies. / BSK BS i + a * * ,L ----'.!:-.tYr3Fr.!!- 4 + + ; * + $ -i' * I * & * + q. \ H|GH COURT DATED:2810812025 -:\ , . 'i... .1-. .\ I \ Eii L ItIfi :, I .l .i'il ''/ .i! ORDER WP.No.25436 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 5 \ \ "d