The High Court · 2025

2. A.Srinivas Rao, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Aged 64 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, Rt/o.Flat No.102, Sai Sudha Residency, Opp. Kondapur RTO Office, Raghavendra Colony, Kondapur, Hyderabad - 500 084.

3. A.Radhika, W/o. A.Srinivas Rao, Aged 57 years, Occ. Housewife Ryo.FIat No.102, Sai Sudha Residency, Opp Kondapur RTO Office, Raghavendra colony' Kondapur' Hyderabad - 500 084 ...pETraoNERS AND '1. The State of Telangana, Department of Home, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretanat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad 3. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli Police Station, Gachibowli, Cyberabad 4. The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Rajendranagar, Cyberabad

5. Smt. Nalini Thutta, Wo. A.Prudhvi, D/o T.Lakshmana Rao, Aged 37 years, Occ:Housewife, Ryo.H.No.10-39, Road Number 5, Vinayaknagar Colony, Bandlaguda Jaasir, Land Mark Vinayaka Floor Mill, ,"'""nilfla-ru33l,u3=*r, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent nos. 3 and 4 in harassing the petitioners to allow the 5th respondent to stay along with them in view of pending GWOP.No.40 ot 2024 and FCOP.No.5O7 ot 2024 before Honourable Judge, Principal Family Court, Ranga Reddy at Kukatpally as illegal, arbilrary, unconstitutiona I and violative of the Art.14,21 of the Constitution of Indra and consequently direct the respondents nos.3 and 4 not interfere with life and Iiberty of the petitioners and further direct the respondent ni i 3 and 4 not allow the Sth respondent to enter the petitioners house premises lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir(jr mstances stated in the affidavit filed In support of the petition, the High Court r ray be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interfere with the iir r and liberty of the petitioners on behesl of respondent no.5, pending disposal of ltis Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. NAGESHWAR RAO pUJAFil Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M. SRINIVAS, AGp FOR H )ME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.25O9L of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.7 to 4. Notice to respondent Nos.5 is dispensed with. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This rvrit petition has been liled seeking the following prayer. - " ...declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in harassing the petitioners to allotu the Sth respondent to stay along u.tith them in uiew of pending GWOP.No.4O of 2024 and FCOP.No.5O7 of 2024 before Honourable Judge Principal Family Court, Ranga Reddy at Kukatpallg as illegal, arbitrary unconstituttonal and uiolatiue of the Art 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents Nos.3 and 4 not interkre u-tith life and libertg of the petitioners and further direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not allou-t the Sth respondent to enter the petitioners house prem ises... "

3. Brief facts as stated in this writ petition are that petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.S on 08.08.2020 as per Hindu rights and customs at Minerva Grand, Kondapur, Hyderabad. Out of wedlock, they were blessed with two children. Thereafter, disputes arose betu,een the petitioners and respondent No.5, as such respondent No.5 had resorted to L.._ 1 -P?r-l \ -- violent behaviour and abused the children and tL.; t in the month of May, 2024, respondent No.5 created ruckus zlr I thr-eatened to kill the childrcn and then kill herself. Thereafter, petitioner No. 1 filed GWOP.No.40 of 2024 and FCOP.No.SO7 <tf tO24 before the Family Court Judge, Ranga Reddy Distrir:t rt Kukatpally. Thereafter, on 16.08.2025, respondent No.5 h I I come to the petitioners'house and tried to stay there forciblr ancl rvhen the petitioners informed the same to respondent Nc s.3 and 4, the respondent/ Police forced pe titioner No.1 to settlt, thc matter and permit respondent No.5 to stay in their holtse r r clsc petitioner No.1 would bc arrcsted on ferlse cases even zrfter- i tforrning about the pending cases. Questionirrg the satne, t lt I present writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Governmcnt Pleader fot- [ ome appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4 placed on record inst uctions issued by Sub-lnspector of Police, Gachibori,li Iolice Station, Karimnagar, wherein it is stated that pc tttioners have approached respondent No.3 on 16.O8.2025 and .hev were calied to Police Station o r-r I8.08.2025 and informed r re petitioner to lodge a complaint in the police station and that Ls on todar,, no complaint hers been lodged b.y the petitioncr. It rs lurther submitted tltzrt respondent No.3 has ne\.( I harassed or threatencd thc petitioners and that respondent/ Police has nothing to do with the pending cases between petitioner No.l and respondent No.5 and the petitioners are un necessarily involving the Police into the matter and accordingly, prayed to dismiss the writ petition

5. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either sides, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition rr.itl-r a directior-r to respondent/ Police to act upon the complaint, if an_v lodged by the petitioners, strictly in accordance to larv. Miscellaneous applications, iI any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs sd/.T.SRtNIVASA REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR t\ t //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '") To, 1 . The Principal Secretary' Department of Home' Secretariat Building' ii[:itrt$'iifl{cft ,;"*fd*":#x"E j}""?'?"'E'!",ii,siAx'*,,'?'"0n"#o'o FI:::"'""wPaE','J|HE[n3l,H'alli33[["i?io#31""" Hvderabad [OUTI T,iro CD CoPies 5 6 7 BN4 PMK I I HIGH COURT DATED:2910812025 ORDER WP.No.25091 of 2025 _ -:=_.:_:' -,- - 1t :r S i5 r_ -:tr iu5 :, .i \ --t\1 .r.- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0t @l{