Shabeer Khan v. Sri V. Dinesh Reddy, Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 11, 12
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: R. SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 307 of 2005 Between: Shabeer Khan, S/o. Saleem. .. Petitioner AND
Sri V. Dinesh Reddy, Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad.
Sri S.B. Prabhakar, Joint Chief Environmental Engineer, A.P. Pollution Control Board, Nampally, Hyderabad.
B. Kistaiah, S/o. Ramakrishnaiah, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 8-3- 228/6, Rahamathnagar Road, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. (R3 impleaded vide Court Order dated: 17-10-2005 in CA. No. 348 of 2005 ) .. Respondents The Contempt Case filed under Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to summon the respondent/contemnors and punish them for violating the directions in W.P. NO. 20566 of 2004 dated: 28-12-2004; The Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the Case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 18-08-2005 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Roy Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners, and of the G.P. for Home for respondents 1 & 2, the Court made the following ORDER: “Impleaded respondent No. 3 shall remain present in the Court. List on 19-10-2005”. //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To
1. Sri V. Dinesh Reddy, Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2. Sri S.B. Prabhakar, Joint Chief Environmental Engineer, A.P. Pollution Control Board, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. B. Kistaiah, S/o. Ramakrishnaiah, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 8-3- 228/6, Rahamathnagar Road, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy of petition and affidavit)
Two spare copies. Ksv Ksv Date of drafting: 18-10-2005 HIGH COURT HACJ & RSRJ DATE: 17-10-2005 NOTE: POST ON 19-10-2005 C.C. No. 307 of 2005 DIRECTION TO THE IMPLEAD RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO BE PRESENT BEFORE THIS COURT ON 19-10-2005
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.