✦ High Court of India · 25 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,004 words

Acts & Sections

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the inaction of the Respondent No. 2 on petitioners Complaints, Dated 09-04-2 025, 30_04_2025, 24_06_2025 & .1 1_08_20 25, and directing the Respondent No.2 to demorish the iflegar structures raised by the Respondent No 4 and 5 in and over the prot Bearing No. 0g part (East side), a a t a Adm. 144 Sq. Yds., or'120.38 Sq. Mtrs., (Out of 300 Sc yds,) in Sy srtuated at Rampally Village, Under Nagaram MuniciJr: lity, Keesara Medchal Malkajgiri District, without obtaining any prirr permission Respondent No. 2. No. 406, Ma nda l, from the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section l5i cpc praying that in the ( rrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cor rt may be pleased to drrect the Respondent No. 2 not to accord any house co r ;truction permission in case the Respondent No. 4 & 5 approaches for obtaini ,g house constructron permission in respect of the plot Bearing No. 09 part (E:r t Side), Adm. 144 sq Yds, or 120 38 Sq Mtrs., (Out of 300 Sq. yds.,) in Sr No 406, situated ar Rampally Vrllage, Under Nagaram Municipality, Kees: ra Mandal, Medchat Malkajgiri District on which already illegal construction is n; de. a. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI POLICE VENKAT REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : Gp FOR MCPL ADMN JRBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.2&3 : SRI pUTTA KRISI-Il lA REDDy, SC FOR MUNICIPALI] Y Counsel for the Respondents No.4&5 : __ The Court made the following: ORDER f * i f t (. HONOURABLE SRIIUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRITPETIT IONNo .25009 0F 202s ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking ro declare the action of respondent No.2 in not acting upon his complaints dated 09.04.2025, 30.04.2025, 24.06.2025 and 11.08.2025 for demolishing the illegal structures raised by respondents No,4 and 5 or"er the Plot No.9 Part (eastern side) admeasuring 144 square yards out of 300 square yards in Survey No.406, situated at Rampally Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

2. Heard Mr. Police Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3; and perused the material on record.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, \ \ basing on the written instructions, submitted that on complaint of rhe petitioner, the site of respondents No.4 and 5 was inspected and it was observed that they were proceeding rvith the unauthorized construction; I i 2 - \ they were directed to forthwith stop the construction a(t vity and submit explanation to the show cause notice within a period (,1 seven (7) days. Reply dated 01.05.2025 was submitted by responder!s No.4 and 5, however, not being satisfied with the same, final order r ated 13.08.2025 was passed directing them to remove the unauthor : ed construction within a period of tifteen (15) days; respondents No..[ and 5 have not complied with the said order. Leamed Standing Counr;r I submitted that after expiry ol the stipulated time, appropriate action vill be taken in accordance with law.

4. Recording the aforesaid submission, without r:r tering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of dirr:r ting respondent No.2 to take turther action pursuant to the speaki rg order dated I3.08.2025, in accordance with law. There shall be no or ler as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous appiications, ii any, pending in / {i this writ petition stand closcd. i .-,^ _-a . _ -.- SD/-8. REKHA RANI S STANT REGISTRAR A{ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER oT 1 The Principal Secretary,.lvtuni-c-ipal Administration and Ll can Development, State ot lelangana, Having office at Secretariat, Hyderit rad. \

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Nagaram Municipality, Keesara Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

3. The Municipal Special Officer and Addl. Collector (Local Body), Nagaram Municipality, keesara Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District. Having office at District Collecteorate, Medchal Malkajgiri District 4 One CC to SRI POLICE VENKAT REDDY, Advocate lOPUCl 5. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 6 One CC to SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY/MC. loPUCl

7. Two CD Copies. BSK BS J I * i $ + i i;. . E*E:-- .E \ \ lr i .r.'i ' ,B IiC, l HIGH COURT \ DATED:2510812025 I j i i t' t ; ORDER WP.No.25009 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS {i a j o 0 b

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments