The High Court · 2025

Judgment

2. State of Telangana, Rept. by its Principal Secrdary, Honre Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad The Corlnmissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Cyberabad Commissionerate' Gachibowli

3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sharnshabad .Division 4. The Station House Officer, PS, Shamshabad ..,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the inaction of 4th Respondent in registering Crime and conducting investigation based on comp{aint submitted by the fuitioner against which Acknowledgement bearing Number CYB/SF{AADZ CYBI 12O8251OO87 1 was given on 12.08.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 4n Respondent to register tfe crime and undertake investigation as pellaw. ' 'g': lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,) 'cumstances stated in

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr ry be pleased pleased to direct the 4h Respondent to register the crime and unrlr rtake investigation as per law pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K RAVI MAHENDER Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made'the following: ORDER .:t, THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.25599 of 2025 This writ petition is hled seeking the following prayer: "...declaing tLe tnaction of respondent No.4 in rbgisteing Cime and conducting inuestiqo;tion based on complaint submitted bg the Petitioner against uthich Acknowledgement beaing Number CYB/ SHBADZ-CYB/ 120825/ 00871 uas giuen on 12.08.2025 as betng illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and ansequentlg direct the 4th Respondent to register the crime and unlertalce inuestigation as per law..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of trand admeasuring Ac, 14-21 gts., forming part of Sy.No.2O3 situated at Julkal Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District having purchased the same ulder registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.507/2008 dated 11.08.2OO8. t, 2 1- Petitioner was also issued with pattadar passlr deed bearing No.TO523OO9O518 with Khata \ submitted that in the year 2024, ther: rok cum title o. I 187. It is was some disturbance from the neighbouring land o't ners due to which the petitioner applied for survey and dr land. The oflicials have conducted the st marcation of rvey in the presence of all neighbouring land owners ct

06.06.2024 and boundaries were fixed for the petitio r Sy.No.203 by drawing up a panchanarna. er's lald in It is further submitted that for the purpose of ensurirr security of entire land, on 08.OB-2021; ; safety and while the petitioner's workmen were undertaking fent i rg work, the neighbouring land owners trespassed and int petitioner's peaceful possession by tryirr :rfered in the I to dump construction material in a portion of petitirr rer's land as well as trying to remove boundaries. hereafter, a complaint was lodged by the petitioner u'i t r respondent No.4 on 12.Oa.2O25. The main grievance of th : petitioner is that despite lodging and complaint, rest :ndent No.4 neither conducted enquiry nor registered anl :rime against the neighbouring lald owners. Questioning I he same, the present writ Petition is filed. Cr J

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Shamshabad police Station has placed a copy of instructions through learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitting that one Ms.Vasantha Reddy lodged a complaint on I2.O8.2O25 stating that she is GPA holder of petitioner and the petitioner is the owner of the subject property and that Government Off-rcials have conducted survey and fixed. ttre boundaries on the said property, however, neighbouring land owners uiz., Kethavath Meena Naik and A,Sairamchandra Reddy c.une to the said land on

08.08.2025 and tried to interfere and removed the boundary stones of the said land. Based on the said complaint, respondent No.4 made GD entry and revealed that there is a boundary dispute between the petitioner alld the said persons in respect of subject land, as such the complaint was closed as 'Civil in Nature'on 18.08.2025 and suggested the petitioner to approach appropriate Court for redressal and informed the same to the petitioner through SMS. As such respondent No.4 conducted enquiry and closed the complaint as Civil in Nature' and tJle allegation that respondent No.4 has not conducted enquiry \ \ t I I I I l I 4 is false and baseless and accordingly prayed t r dismiss the writ petition.

5. In that view of the matter, since thr: complaint of the petitioner has already been considered b, respondent No.4, this writ petition is disposed of with e direction to respondent authorities to follow due p ocedure S contemplated under of law before initiating a ey action on the subject property of the petitioner. Neetl 3ss to state, petitioner may seek appropriate remedy as au rilable under law. Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to :osts /TRUE COPY// SI) -K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASiI iISTANT REGISTRAR L7 SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Principal Secretary, Home Dept, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Cyber:rl ad Commissionerate, Gachibowli

3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Shamshabad Divis r r 4. The Station House Officer, PS, Shamshabad 5. One CC to SRl. K RAVI MAHENDER Advocate [OPL( ] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State rf Telangana. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies PVL BS i i I l I HIGH COURT DATED:2910812025 \ \ r{' s rA i i/ Jril 2m , 7_ * I : :=-.spe:-cir ----:= 't. ORDER WP.No.25599 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1ks nf'f zG i i. F