M/s. Krishna Metal lndustries Pvt Ltd v. Dir.ector Mr.Gir.ish Gupta
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In rriew of the submissions made by learned counsel for the p:titioner, as the cause does not survive, this civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orcler as to costs. Interim orders and miscerlaneous petitions, if any, pending jn the…
Judgment
Cause title
M/s. Krishna Metal lndustries Pvt Ltd at H. No. 13-6-824t1,Karjwan Road Hyderabad, rep. by its authorized signatory and Dir.ector Mr.Gir.ish Gupta And ...Petitioner
/RespondentlDefendant Tirupati Roller Flour tvlills Pvt Ltd, at H.No. 1 3-6-82411,Karawan Road Hyderabad, rep. by its authorized signatory, SriVishal Goyal S/o. Sri Vijay Goyal, aged about 53 years R/o Ambiance Fort Attapur, Hyderabad-500008 ...Respondent
/RespondenU Defendant lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to withdraw the amount to be deposited by the respondent, pending disposal of OS.No.77l202O on the file of the XVll Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. For the Petitioner :
Sri D. Aniketh Reddy, Advocate For the Respondents:
Sri R.A. Achuthanand, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER THE,HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO
ORDER:
LeeLrned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in this civil Revision petition does not survive as suit is settled between the parties.
Operative part
In rriew of the submissions made by learned counsel for the p:titioner, as the cause does not survive, this civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orcler as to costs. Interim orders and miscerlaneous petitions, if any, pending jn the civil Revision petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER 1- The XVll ,\dditional senior civil Judge, city civir courts, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri. D- Aniketh Reddy, Advocate'lOpuc]
One CC to Sri R.A. Achuthananci, Advocate lbeUC[ 4. Two CD Copies o\ \ To, HIGH COURT DATED: 1711012025 /( / a \Ju' () i: t 1 ,) {l (. i1 6 U * * ORDER CRP. No. 1 90t3 of 2022 REVISION ISi DISIVIISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS NO COSTS t
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.