The High Court · 2025

potice Station Saro'ornagar,'High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana. ...ResPondent No.1

2. Smt.Ganii Mounika, Wo.Ravirala Harish, Age' 28 years' Occ Travel consultaht, R/o.Flat No. 1 03, Srinilayam, Panama Godown, vanasthallpuram, Ranga ReddY District. .. ...Respondent No.2/Defacto -complainant Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Membrandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may u" pr""."o to quash the Proceedings in c.c.No.167O of 2o23 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L. B. Nagar' -: alf I.A. NO:1 OF 2023 Petition under section _492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lr/emorandum of Grounds ot criminir ietition, the High court may bg gre3ged to stay of ail further proceedings in c.c.No.rozo of 2023 0n the fire of the v Additionar lvretroooritan Magistratelt r-.a.r.rugrr, pending disposar of the Criminal Petition. I.A. NO:1 oF 2025 BETWEEN: Smt.Ganji Mounika, Wo.Ravirala Harish, Age. 28 years. Occ. Travel Consultant, Rio.Flat No..103, Srinilayam, pa"nami 6tOo*n, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. ...Respondent No.2/Defacto -comprainant in r.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2o2i AND

1. Mr.Ravirala Harish, R/o. H.No.8-6-842, Hyderabad. S/o Ravirala Krishna, Age. 3.1 .years, Occ. private Service, Plot No 207, Christian*s Corirny,-'nisiinaprijr"'ftlin, J

2. Smt.Ravirala Karuna. Wo.Krishna. Age. 5.1 years. Occ.Household. No.207, Christia-ns cotony, Hastin;il;;, "N#tl R/o.H.No.8-6-842 ptor Hyderabad. Mr.Ravirala Krishna. S/o late Narsimha. Age. 57 Vears, Occ. Business. R:/o-H.No 8-6-842. ptot tt"ioz.-oriisitinr'".orJny,, nu.iinrprrri" r.rl]it, Hyderabad. 4. Smt.Ankam Age.33 years, Occ.Household, Nandini, w/o.Giri prasad,. agar, Near Sagar Complex, Hyd!rabad.' R/o.Th rimalan . ...Petitioner/A1 to 44 in l.A.Nos.1 and Z ol 20ZS

5. The State of Telanoana, Rep by ils public prosecutor, Through Women Porice station saro-ornagar,'Hig[, cirrt;iL'rdlJature at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana. ...Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ol 2O2i Petition under Section. 359 (6) R/w 320 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Gro'unds or crimiriat ir," High court may be pleased to permit the petitionei and respondent No.2 who is de-facto complaint to compound the offenses. -p"i,tit., l.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Petition under Section. 359 (2) and 320 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandu, or-c"Lnos of criminar petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to record tne and quash the -compromise proceedings in cc.No.1670 ol 2023 V Additional fi/etropolitan ililagistrate at L B Nagar. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Dinesh Reddy, Advocate representing sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri K. Bheemayya, advocate representing Sri P.Srikar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, and'Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1' The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER - -i4f:'+: I I I I I I I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.1 and? of2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PITTTTION No.9623 of 2023 COMMO N ORDER: This Criminal petition has been filed under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners, who werb arrayed as accused Nos.l to 4, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.l670 of 2023 on the frle of rhe V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, for the offences punishable under sections 498(A) of the Indian penal code,, l g60 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry prohibition Act, 1961.

2. During the pendency of this criminal petition, petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 and respondent No.2/de_facto complainant have entered into compromise to resolve the disputes pending between them and filed joint affidavit along with I.A.No.2 of 2025 and also filed another I.A.No. I of 2025 to record the compromise and to compound the \ offences. 2

3. The above said applications came up for consideration before this Court on02.09.2025, and this Court directed the petitioners/accused Nos. I to 4, ar-.d respondent No.2/de-facto complainant, to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, along with their identity cards for their identification, on or before 06.09.2025, ard further directed the Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee to submit a report by lO-09.2O25. Pursuant to the same, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee submitted reporl dated O4.O9.2O25 -

4. Heard Mr.M.Dinesh Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.I(.Bheemayya, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Srikar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 5- Both the counsel submitted that the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 and respondent No.2 entered into compromise at the instance of their well wishers and elders and settled their I I i I I l ' I t t-.'*YT 3 disputes. The terms of compromise were mentioned in the joint affidavit frled in support of I.A.No.2 of 2025.

6. Taking into consideration the above facts and crrcurristances including joint memo frled by both the parties, proceedings in C.C.No.167O of 2023 on the fite of the V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, against the petitioner/accused Nos. I to 4 are liable to be quashed.

7. Accordingly, I.A.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.1670 of 2023 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, against the petitioner/accused Nos. I to 4 are hereby quashed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-A. JAYASRT,E ASSISTANT ITF],GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar. 2. The station House officer, women porice station, saroornagr, Rachakonda 3 Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the State of rerangana at Hyderabad [OUT] I I t

4. One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar ,Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to Sri P.Srikar, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies W- NVB/PSL (Joint Memo is enclosing herewith) HIGH COURT DATED:1010912025 l COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 &2ot2025 ln/And CRLP.No.9623 ot 2023 r! - - i"-)- - , : ';{ 7-r '- ts - - l':rt*' .^.-\ 111 ,i .., !:) 2rst P ?[6 :t:i " l' ...' ALLOWING THE CRLP AND t.A.Nos.l AND 2 OF 2025 q j o 1A -tD MEMORANDUM OF INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION EILED UNDER Section 482 & 320 of CRPC/ 528, 359 of BNSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P No.9623 Of 2023 Against H"l'j;:rv Addl' Metropolitan Magistrate at LB C.C.No.1670 of 2Oz3 on the file "f Between:

1. Mr.Ravirala Harish, S/o.Ravirala Krlshna, Age: 31 years, Occ: Private Service, Rfo.H.No.8-6-842, Plot No.207, Christians colony, Hastinapuram North, HYderabad.

2. Smt.Ravirala Karuna, ffo.Krishna, Age: 51 years, Occ:Household, Rfo.H.No.8-6-842, Plot No.207, Christians colony, Hastinapuram North, HYderabad.

3. Mr.Ravlrala Krishna, S/o.late Narsimha, Age: 57 years, Occ: Business, Rfo.H.No.B-6-842, PIot No.207, Christians colony, Hastinapuram North, HYderabad.

4. Smt.Ankam Nandini, w/o'Giri Prasad, Age:33 years, Occ:Household, Rfo.Thrimalanagar, Near Sagar Complex, Hyderabad. And 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Through Women Police Station Saroornagar, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana.

2. Smt.Ganji Mounika, Wo.Ravirala Harish, Age: 28 years, Occ: Travel Consultant, Rfo.Flat No.103, Srinilayam, Panama Godown, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District' Petitioners/Al to 44 .Respondent No.1 ... Respondent No.2/De-facto complainant JO]NT MEM OF COMPROM o E 1' It is submitted that the 2ld Respondent has rodged a compraint against thl" Petitioners herein before the porice women porice station. saroor Nagar. Basing on the above compraint, the porice women porice station, saroor Nagar has registered a case in Crime No. 150/2023 for the offences under section 498-4 Ipc and sec-3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, against the petitioner herein. # 2' It is submitted that the investigation officer in the above case, without proper invesiigation fired a finar report for the offences mentioned above. The Hon,bre v Addr, Metroporitan Magistrate at LB Nagar, without rooking into the facts of the case, taken the cognizance of the offence punishabre section 498-4 IpC and Sec-3 & 4 0f Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, against the Petitioners herein and registered the charge sheet as cc. No. 167012023. 3' It is submilted that during the pendency of the above case, the petitioners and the Defacto comprainant/2"d Respondent have compromised the matter at the intervention or the elders and we'-wishers. As per their advice, the petitioners and the 2nd Respondent have decided to compromise the issue be.,^/een them and the Compraint/2ndRespondent agreed to compromise by taking the arimony of Rs.g,00,000/-(Nine Lakhs rupees onry) from the petitioners and the same will be given by the petitioners after the withdrawal of all cases between both the par-ties anc have no objection to compound the offence under punishabre Section 498-4 Ipc and sec-3 & 4 0f Dowry prohibition Act, 1961, on the fire of Hon,ble v Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate at LB Nagar. Therefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be preased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in CC. No. 1670/2023 0n the fire of the Hon,bre v Addr. Metroporitan Magistrate at LB Nagar and pass such other order or orders as the Honbre Court may deem fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Hyderabad Date: .7.Z0ZS Petitioner No.1 H 5a^o"51" Petitioner No.2 t, q ,40'tF Respondent No.2 Cou (1 nse-[ for the ,'*q Petitioner Petitioner No.3 Petitioner No.4 r --. i.- Counsel fo the Respondent No.2. i i i i I i I I i I i I I i I i I ' I I