✦ High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 Sep 2025
Length
1,073 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN NNO:26 WRI PETlTro T 123 OF 2025 Between:

1. Sri V. Srinivasa Rao. ,ffi n*il*i,tiai;"1Y;,fi lm:rx:i#:RX,X,."HLrJ,I",s,,,ilf * " ". s# n :; f ffi "liTls,"i:: % [? i{Slt,B3fl ;A,,?1, m*, :iljitr""a113l8xlj'i"?{r;"il''BtlJ;.xg;,1E::i1."?J,",ii.o,3i&,o1il"".., 4. Sri Chilukala parashura B u s i ness, c/o ;; yea rs, occ | ?jBlk;f fd:"5:*BiT; rt?,",i r3!:jt# ^fi AND ...PETITIONERS 1 IP^9]gt: of Tetangana, Rep. by.its prrncipat Secretary, Revenue uevetopment Department, Secri:tariat euiidinlslii"yoeraoaa. 2. The Greater Hvderabad corporation' Rep bv its commissioner, GHMC Buildingr, r;;r.,#Hliiipal 3 The commissioner' Hvrrerabad Metro Deveropment Authority swarnalavanthi comptex, sanieeva n6dov r.rigriH;"ai', silffisZ r\ragar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

4. The Zonal Commissioner,.West Zone, Circle _ 20 GHMC, SedingampallyRanga Reddy OistrLi.' 5 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Manda{, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.

6. The Revenu.e llrgpector, Serilingampally Mandal Office, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS dectaring the action of the respondents Nos. ...RESPONDENTS 5 and 6 heren wro ":;:T,1fi"::J[:"11,:i;,:llfilftil]:ffi1: :;";;r;;e yards equivatent ,: tii^:^:::i:J:::r,, petitioners in respect,:: '.qru,"v",d' each totallv ilil; ;ndapur -V.rage,:::]iff iljJjl I:L* inSy Nos. rot ( P'1 'i.,,,.J,l*;ra Reddy District is b':ins :::::,lllnr.o Circle' xattea ^:;;;"-^ of the Corstitution of lndia i GHMC Serilingarnpally unreasonabre anri violative of article 14 and 300-A:T;-";r1;; er,oing p"'tit violation of the principr", "i "nr*, iustice and contrary t: the Building Pe / sLP /2025-BP' dated 1807 2025 issued by order vide permt uo'seJ'";" the respondents No 2 to o n"'"'n and contrary to the pr )visions contemplated under Greater uyaeranai Municipal corporation Act and rrles made there under and consequen y direct the respondents No 5 un6 6 hsrcin not to interfere into the construction activities of the petitioners herein in respect of in plot Nos 465 and 466, admeasuring 300 square yards each totally 600 square yards equivalent to 50'1 .6 squ]re Meters in Sy Nos 101( Part ) situated at Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal' GHMC Serilingampally Circle' Ranga Reddy District IA NO: 10F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High pleased to di'ect the respondents No S and 6 herein construction activities of the petitioners herein in respect , admeasurin'3 300 square yards each totally 600 sqt 501 .6 Square Meters inSy Nos 101 ( Part ) situatt Serilingampally lvlandal, Glltr/lC Serilingampally Circle pending disposal of the main writ petition circumstances stated in Court maY be Pleased not to interfere into the of plot Nos. 465 and 466 rare Yards equivalent to :d at KondaPur Village' Ranga ReddY District, Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KOPPULA GOPAL counser for the Respondents No. 1,5"u' i[f*;}?%ileffiffi sHASrRt' S;[iE",for Respondent No.2to4 : SRTG.MADHUSUDH.{N REDDY, SC FOR The Court made the following: ORDER i;atl' I THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUS'TICE K. LAKSHMAN ORDBR WRIT PETITION No.26123 of 2025 Heard Sri Koppula Gopal, learned counsel for the pctitioner and Sri H.Sornaiah Ezra Sliastri, learned Assistant Governtnent Pleader for Assignrnent, lor respondent Nos. I , 5 anci 6.

2. The petitioners are clairning that they are the absolute owners and possessors of ptot Nos.465 and 466 adtncasuriug 300 scluare yards each in Sy.No. l0l (par1) at Kondapur Viltage, Sorilingampally Mandal under GHN4C Seril inga rnpally Circle, Ranga Reddy District on the strength ol registered sale deeds vide docut'nent bearing Nos.3748 of 2024 and 3862 of 2024, dated 22.02.2024. They obtained building pennit order dated

18.01 .2025 from G.H.M.C. fol construction of stiltr 5 upper floors. They ale proceeding ivith the constructiorl strictly in accotdance rvith the said building perrnit order. Even theu, resl.rondcnt Nos.5 and 6 ar-e interfeling with the said construction activity without lollorving due plocedure laid dorvn under law. Chaltenging the saicl actiotr of respondent Nos.5 and 6, the present writ petition is filed.

3. Whereas, the learned Assistant Covcrtrment Pleader fbr Revenue produced written instructions of rcsponclent No.5 stating tl-rat subiect I I , I propefty is covered by U.L.C. aud as pct' order dated 23.12.2015 in 2 W.A.Nos.:i43 of 2015 and batch shorving the same in t rc list ol prohibited properties rrnder Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1()08.

1. The said written instructions are placed on recor,i. The said writtcn iustrrrctions of r-espondcnt No.4 are fachrally incorrect. fhe pctitioners are clairning r glrt ovel the aforesaid plopcl-ty basing .on the albresatd two registerecl riale deecls datcd, 22 .02.2024. They have also obtained buitding pernrit order dated 18.07.2025, for constructing stilt. 5 upper floors. Thcreforc. respondent No.5 cannot say that subject prolrerty is covered by tJLC and tlrcy crn intelfere.

5. ln tlrc liglrt of the samc. the Writ Petition is disposcd of directing respondont Nos.5 and 6 not to interlele with the constrrction activity ttrat has been carried out by the petitioners in the aforcsaid pr opcrty. pursuant to building pernrit ordcr dated 18.07.2025 without lollowirrg clue procedurc laid down uudcl law, IJowever, the petitioncr.s shall proceed wrth the constluctioll strictly in accortlance with. building pr.nnit order dated 18.07 2025. t-ailing rvhich, liberty is gr.anted to responcl-:ut Nos. j ancl 4 to take action against the petitioners in accordance with Iaw Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sliall stantl closecl. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MALLIKARJUNA RAO TANT REGISTRAR .., SECTION OFFICER $ 1 The Princip_al Secretary, Revenue Development Deparment, Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2 J The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, GHtt4C Buildings, Tank Bund Hyderab'ad The Comnrissioner, Hyderabad Metro Development Authority SwarnaJayanthi Complex, Sanjeeva R6ddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar Arieerpet, Hyderabad. To !. , , _ .i__x ----:ffi ': -- -, , 1 I l 4 rhe Tonal Commissioner, West Zone' Circle - 20 GHMC' SeitingampallyRanga Reddy District'

5.TheTahsildar,serilingampallytr/andal,serilingampally,RangaReddy Diskict.

6. The Revenue lnspector, Serilingampally tvlandal Office' Serilingampally' Ranga ReddY District

7. One CC to SRI KOPPULA GOPAL' Advocate lOPUCl 8. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT' High Court for the State of Telangana

9. One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' SC FOR GHMC TOPUCI 1 0. Two CD CoPies louTl BSK PVL \q HIGH COURT DATED:0210912025 j I , +., z o -\ 1 5 SEP 2{U5 DEspA'r::ri c-O { * ORDER WP.No.26123 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .I\ c"flto (a W@

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments