Smt. Samala Bokka Banu Priya Reddy v. 1. The Government of Telangana

9. Smt. Bokka Andalu, Wo Bokka Jagan Mohan Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Home Maker. R/o H.No.2-70112, Kothaguda Kandukur Mandal, R. R. District.

10.Smt. Thota Anusha, Wo T. Srinivas Reddy. Aged about 32 years, Occ Home Maker. Rio H. No. 2-70h2, Kothaguda Village. Kandukur Mandal, R. R. District. :ry:i 1 1 . Thota Srinivas Reddy, S/o not known. Aged about 35 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee RJo H. No. 2-70112, Kothaguda Village. Kandukur Mandal, R. R District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of Inc iar praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the lligh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ. order or direction, mtre parlicularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring inaction of the l?espondent No.6 in considering my comolaint Dt 05-08-2025 against the Respond,:nts No. 7 to 11 who committed dowry and domestic violence and harassed me nrentally and physically is illegal, arbitrary and violation of articles 14, 15,21 of constitulion of lndia, consequently direct ihe Respondent No.6 to consider my comolaint Dt 05-08-2025 and take necessary action again the Respondents No. 7 to 11 as per law. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ'lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 to consider the complaint of the Pet tir:ner Dt 05-08-2025 and take necessary against the Respondents No. 7 to '1 1 vrl- o committed dowry and domestic violence and harassed me mentally and physic;ll y. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 6 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to l 1 : -- The Court made the following ORDER 4 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.2516 4 of 2025 This rvrit petition is filed seeking the following prayer " . . . rleclaring tnaction of tlrc Re spondent No.6 in considenng mA complaint dated 05.08.2025 against the Respondents /[os' 7 to 1 1 who committed doun.l and dontestic uiolence and harassed- me mentally and phg sically is illegaL' arbitrarg and uiolation of Atlicles 14' 15' 21 of constitution of htdict consequentlg direct Respondent No.6 to consicler my complaint dated 05.08.2025 and take n-ecessarA action against Respond-ents No.7 to 17 as per lart't ' '"

2.Heatd learned coutrsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Governmcnt Pleacler for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos l to 6 With their consent' this writ petition is taken up for disposal' Notice to respondent Nos.7 to 1 1 is disPensed with'

3. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner's marriage rvas performed on 14 06 2019 with respondent No.7 at Pramidha Function hal1, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal' Ranga Reddy District. It is submitted that after a month \ 2 from the date of marriage, respondent No.7 along with his parents started harassing the petitioner for rvant of additional dour-v. In the month of Febr r ary, 2022, petitioner lcft to Car-rada for higher studies an C returned to India in tl-rc nronth of ..lune. 2025. I- ou,ever. the harassmenL of rcspondent No.7 and his parcnts, continued. As such, petitioner approached respondert No.6 and Iodged a complaint to take action against resp,rndent Nos.7 to 11, Holi,r'ver, respondent No.6/Police have rrr;t registered crln le against respondent Nos.7 to 1 1 . Que stioning the inaction of respondent/ Police, the preserrt u r rt pctition is .1. Tl-re S,rb-lnspector of Police, Ibrahimp.rtnarn Police Station has pl:Lcccl a copy of instructior-rs thrt u gh lcarr-red Assistant (]overnment Pleader for Homc statinrl Lhat on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 05.ou.2025, respondent No.6 made a GD entry and enqLrr. has bcen concluctcd and that during the course ol' enquiry, respondent No-6 contacted the petitioner oVer phone, hovvever her phone was switched off and the pc titioner was also not avzrilable in the given address. Subs,cquently, it E ,, J \\ras revealed that petitioner left India and went to New ZeaJand and as of now both the petitioner and respondent No.7 are residing in New Zealand. However, after lodging complaint, petitioner has never approached respondent No.6 and il petitioner approachcs respondent No.6 with rele vant evidence, appropriate action u'ill be initiated.

5. Per corttra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is v.er1' much in India and is ready to cooperate r,rrith the enquiry

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, this u'rit peLition is disposed ol with a direction to respondent No.6/Polce to conduct enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner, if the petitioner cooperates with the enquir-r' by follon'ing due procedure as contemplated under 1arv. Miscellaneous petitions, pendir-rg, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6SECTION OFFI CER To Secretariat. Hvderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary, Government of Telangana' Home Department' ,. i;; DILii; cieneiar of Police' Telangana State a! Hvderabad' 5. i'r;; c;;.sioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionarate ;. iii; Dil;il Supeiinienoenrbf Police, Maheshwaram zone' Rachakonda s. inij nriidormissioner of Police, lbrahimpatnam Division, Rachakonda Police Commissionarate. Police Commissionarate IL \ rl-. l, I \ 6 7 B I SA PMK The Station House Officer, lbrahimpatnam police Stat o r, Rachakonda police Com m iss ion a rate. L*g C9. t9.G^f IOR HOME, High Court for the State cf Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OpU(]l Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 I I ORDER WP.No.25164 of 2025 1H: S14 .s 1l rnu 1p (r ( i ! ( :t,J o \J ) I ir i:l )- DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. te- ta r( TT