1. [t4/q,c..arg-gs_o-ltlogistics Pvt. Ltd v. The state o-f relangana

4. M/s.Rohini solares Pvt. Ltd-, Rep. by its Managing Director K.Anil Kumar, [9Sd Of{ce 105, B-Block, Usha Enclive, NavodlyiColony, lrtear Satvi Sai Nigam , Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-S00 073, Stat-e of Telangana

5. M/s.solon lndia Pvt.Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised signatory -Vice president operationsl''PEhandramouleshwbra Rao, D. No.52, FhaseV, IDA Jeedimefl a, Hyderabad,-500 055, State of Telangana. , : i ' ...RESPoNDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances ptated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ ,order or direction , more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandam.yp-..and call for the records relating to impugned complaint lodged by the 4th Sespondent /defacto complainant company in Crime No. 1017 of 2016 on the file.qf SHO, Banjara Hills, P.S, Hyderabad, is arbitrary ,illegal and accordingl, Or"rn',n" same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner by calling the Petitioner to Police station in connection with the Crime Nli,1017 of 2016 on the file of SHO, Banjara Hills, P.S, Hyderabad, and to pass su*t other or further orders as this Hon ble court may deem it and proper in the circurhstances of the case. D l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 40501 OF 201Z) -t- Petition under Sectioil',1pl CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in .rnoffi the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further pro6#dings including calling the petitioner to the Police station in connectidn with lrr.,estigation of Crime No. 1017 of 2016 on the file of sHo., Banjara Hills, P.S, nlu.i'ioro, pending disposal of writ petition and to pass such other or further orders rJ tnir Hon'ble court may deem it and proper in'the circumstances of the case. Counselfor the Petitioner : SRI C.H.KHORANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondeils l.lo.1&2 : GP FOR HOME i Counsel for the Respondenlb No.3tos : The Court made the ORDER following: #tl.., i-, I i:' q ::'r, 'it ! k B I ,l THE HONOURABLE SRI JT'STICI N'TUKARAMJI No. g2ss4 oF 20 L7 ORDER: This writ Petition is filed under Article 226 0f constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- . '...issue an appropriate writ 'order or direction ' more oarticularlyonginthenatureofwritofMandamusandcallfor ilt"tirrg to impugned complaint lgdged by the 4th_ ffi;;;'" company in Crime No' 1017 of Respondent iJ"r""i' "91qi"i1"'t Hyderabad, is 2Ot6 on tnl nte of SHb, Banjara Hi[s, arbitrary ,iliegal and accoldingty guash tl:e sarne and -iitt"t U't ?Ld reJpondent no! to harass the consequenUy the Petitioner io Police station in connection ;iiii';"t uli "Jti"g with the crime wolrorz of 2016 0n the file of SHO, Banjara Hills, P.S, ffyJ"t"U"a, and to pass such other. or further orders as this Hon'ble court may deem it and proper in the circumstances of the case"""'" -P.S,. None appeared on behalf of tJ'e petitioner' 2

3. Heard Mr.M'srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos' t and 2'

4.|.earned'counselforthepetitionerssubmitsthatthe counsel on record for the petitioners had given up vakalath along

5.ThelearnedAssistantGovernmentPleaderforHome submits that the present writ petition seeks quashment of the proceedings in crime No. 1017 of 2016 on tl.e file of the Banjara Hills Police Station. It is submitted that, during the pendency of lhepresentproceedings,theinvestigationwasdulycompleted, and a charge sheet was frled. consequently, the case has been ! 2 \ taken on file as C.C. No. 245 of 2018 before the Court of t]le III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, and the matter is presently pending for trial, Iisted on 24.1O.2025. Hence, it is contended that, since the trial proceedings are actively continuing, the present writ petition has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed.

6. I have perused the material available on record.

7. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashment of the crimina-l proceedings. However, as reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the investigation has culminated in the frling of a charge sheet, which has disclosed a triable case. The learned trial Court, having examined the material placed before it, has taken cognizance of the offences and even framed charges against the petitioner. These developments clearly indicate that a prima facie case exists for adjudication in the course of trial.

8. In these circumstances, and in the absence of any material placed before this Court demonstrating that tJle proceedings are manifesfly illegal, malicious, or an abuse of process, this Court finds no justification to exercise its inherent or extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the proceedings.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the -rights of the petitioner are reserved to raise all permis5jflg 3 t contentions and grievances before the learned trial Court' in accordance with law, if so advised' There shall be no order as to Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any' shall stand closed' Sd/.B.REKHA RANI REG //TRUE COPY/ N OFFICER '/ \ To,

1. One CC to SRI C'H'KHORANA REDDY' Advocate' 2. Two CCs to Hyderabad GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at

3. Two CD CoPier BSK Qu. PMK t t HIGH COURT DATED i1611012025 i i ,I i i I i i i I I I ORDER (.r ,rn i"qS o 20rrcet 1n(' WP.No.32554 of 2017 )q' O^ .t DISM]SSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (P 6 A \'v z\