K. Sandeep Babu v. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Hebeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to physically produce the petitioner's wife namely Smt. Hemalatha who is in illegal custody / detention under the 4th respondent, before this Hon'ble High Court and set her free. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI P.LAXMA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Advocate General on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and of
Smt M. Suguna, Advocate for respondent No.4, the Court made the following.
ORDER :-
Petitioner is the husband of the alleged detenue. Counsel for the 4th respondent submits that the alleged detenue is taking treatment in the custody of R-4. In the circumstances, the 2nd respondent shall cause production of the alleged detenu through respondent No.4 on 28/12/2010.
//TRUE COPY// To Sd/- D. SUSEELA, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Near JNTU, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
Madhukar Swamy, Circle Inspector of Police, Humayunnagar Police Station, Humayunnagar, Hyderabad. (Addressee Nos. 1 to 3 by Special Messenger)
S. Bangaraiah S/o. Not Known R/o. 24-2-1107, Ram Nagar, 3rd Street, Dhargamitta, Nellore.
Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of A.P., Hyd(OUT) (By Special Messenger)
One CC to Sri P.LAXMA REDDY, Advocate(OPUC)
One CC to Sri M. Suguna, Advocate(OPUC)
Two spare copies. TKK HIGH COURT VE.J & PSR.J DT.22-12-2010. ORDER W.P.No. 23672 of 2010 [ D I R E C T I O N DRAFTED BY TKK DT.22-12-2010. HIGH COURT VE.J & PSR.J DT.22-12-2010. Note :- Post on 28-12-2010. ORDER W.P.No. 23672 of 2010 D I R E C T I O N
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.