High Court · 2025

2. Sri V.V. NAIDU, S/o. Sri MALAKONDAIAH NAIDU, Aged about 77 yea.s, Occupation. Business, Resident of Flat No.213, Phase-2, Kavuri Hills, Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.

3. Sri V. IMAHINDRA, S/o. Sri VV. NAIDU, aged about 49years, Occupation Business, Resident of Flat No.213, Phase-2, Kavuri Kavuri Hills, Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet, Hyderabad Petitioner 'l to 3 are Rep by its Managing Partner/GPA Holder Sri Hari Venkata Venu Gopala Krishnamraju S/o. Sri. Appala Narasimha Raju, Age 42 years, Occ. Busines, R/o- Bhimavaram, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh Presently residing at Plot No.204, Ruhikha Apartments, Gokul Flats, KPHB, 9th Phase, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Medchal-tVlalkajgiri Diskict 3. The Commissioner and lnspector General, Stamps and Registration Department, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad

4. The District registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At Moosapet 5. The Sub-Registrar, Vallabnagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District 6. The Sub-Registrar, Balanagar SRO, At Balanagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot tle Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly on in the nature of WRIT OF l\4ANDAtvlUS by declaring the action o'the Respondent No. 2 in not taking action against Respondents No.4 to il by considering the representations dated 29-04-2025, 25-02-2025, 16-)2-2024 in view of entertaining the registration of sale deeds during the prchibition of land to an extent of Ac.2-00 r3untas in Sy.No. 560iAA12 of Alwal Village and Mandal, Medchal-Malka.igiri District as furnished by the Respondent No.2 and simply directing the Respondent No.5 to give reply to me is illegal arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the R()spondent No.2 to take necessary action against the Respondents 4 to 6 for their abuse of powers in registering the Cocuments i.e., GPA No. 1283712016 and AGPA No. 12838/2016 dated 28-09-2016 ard sale deed No.2112120'17 dated '1ti-03-20'1 8 and all other consequential docurnents in respect of the land in Sy.l,lo. 560/P(new Sy No. 560/AA/2) situated at Alwal Village and Mandal, durirrg the subsistence of prohibitory order of Respondent No.2 and to declare thet.n as null and void and not valid in the eye <:f law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr:r circumstances stated in the affidavit +iled in support of the petition, the High Coult may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 not to entertain any further d tcuments in respect of land to extent of Ac 2-00 Guntas in Sy.No. 560lAAl2 situaled at Alwal Village and ltlandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District pending disposal of thr,r Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.Y.N.L.N.CHARYULU Counsel for the Respondents: SMT S.SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.25254 of2O2S ORDER: Heard Sri D.Y.N.L.N.Charyulu, Iearned counsel for the petitioners ald smt S.Sravanthi, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration for the respondents. with their consent, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ pctition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in not taking action against respondent Nos.4 to 6 for their abuse of powers in registering the documents i.e. GpA No. 12g37 l2016 and AGPA No.12838/2016 dated 28.09.2016 and Sale Deed No-2r12/2o17 dated 16.03.2018 and arl other consequentiar documents in respect of the land in Sy.No.56O/p (new Sy.No.56O/4.,{/2) situated at Alwal Village and Mandal, during the subsistence of prohibitory order of Respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the main grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent No.2 is not taking any disciptinary action against the \ \ \ 2 respondent Nor;.4 to 6 though the respon<lent No'2 is the competent authority for taking disciplinar-v acl ion against them. Aggrieved try the same, the petitioners ilade representations dated 29.Ct4.2O25, 25.02.2025 and 16'02'2A24 before the respondent No.3.

4. Learn,:d ,r\ssistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration sr, bmits that in reply to the said representations lrled by the petitioners, respondent No'6 ulcie Lr'No'153 12025 datedlo.c|6.2o21informedthepetitionersthathehasnot empowered. to t:ancei the already registered documents and also Registration pl'ocess cannot be stopped basing on the protest petition ar d h,: has no power to stop the re gistration process' prior injunctio:r order or cancellation order fi om the competent Civil Court 1o him to stop the registr ation process or calcellation or-ders to cancel the document:; and directed the petitioners to approach the civil court for redressal of their grievance. V/ithout challenging the Lr'N'r'153/2O25 dated 10.06.2025, the petitioners approached tlris Court to take disciplinary action against the respond:nt Nos'4 to 6' Moreover, wit.hout approaching the Compr tent Authority for I I / / 3 taking disciplinary.action against the respondent No.4_District Registrar, respondent No.5-Sub Registrar, Vallabnagar and respondent No.6-sub Registrar, Balarragar, the petitioners filed the instant writ Petition and the same is not maintainable and requested to pass appropriate order.

5. After hearing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for taking disciplinary action against the respondent Nos.4 to 6.

6. In view of the submissions made on either side and on perusing the entire material on record, without going into merits of the case, this Writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach competent authority for taking disciplinary action against the respondent Nos.4 to 6 as per law. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA A TANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER 1 The Princip Hyderabad, al Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department Secretariat, State of Tetangana.' 2. The District Collector, Medchal-Matkajgiri District 3. The commissioner and rnspector Generar, Stamps and Registration Department, Government of Teiangana, UvOerabaJ - -4acfrir''r.:?,/ :ill -/

4. The District rogistrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At [\'loosapet 5. The Sub-Registrar, Vallabnagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri l)istrict 6. The Sub,-Registrar, Balanagar SRO, At Balanagar, M edchal-Malkajgiri District 7. One CC to St?l D Y.N.L N.CHARYULU, Advocate [OI)UC] 8, Two CCS to ,3P FoR STAMPS & REGISTRATIoN, i-1igh Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT] 9 Two CD Coptes BSR BS W t, J HIGH COUR'I- SKJ DATED: 26108t2025 I I -.,'-= ==._-_ '','' t"irii /. (("" ' ) :) U 12 SEP 2W 9 -:, ( -2 ORDER WP.No.25254 of 2025 \ ''). I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT CO.STS \ 1 I 4 \ t{