The High Court · 2025

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' order or direction' more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the inaction of Respondents 2 to 5 in not taking any steps pursuant to my legal notice/rep resentatio n dated 11-08-2025 '-':rijlr ai! :_.'. 2r{ ) as illegal, arbitrary and unco nstitutionar and consequenfly direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to forthwith exercise their statutory powers under the GHI\4c Act, 195s to stop and remove the iflegar and unauthorized structure raised by Respondents 6 and 7 on Plot No.B6, Sy.No.238, puppalaguda Village, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District. l.A.NO: 1 OF 2 025 Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to take action to stop the ongoing iregar and unauthorized construction being carried out by the Respondents 6 and 7 on prot No.86, Sy. No.23B, puppalaguda Village, Serilingampall y Zone, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the petitioner : Ms. A.SAWASIRI counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : Gp FoR McpL ADMN & URBAN DEVELoPMENT Counsel for Respondent No.2TOS : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDy, SC FOR GHMc Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : - The Court made the following ORDER i l l ; ] HEHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No.24703 oF 2025 ORDER:(ORAL) This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the inaction of respondent Nos. 2 to 5 pursuant to the legal notice/representation dated 11.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner regarding unauthorised construction raised by respondent Nos'6 and 7 in PlotNo.S6inSy.No.238situatedatPuppalagudaVillage' Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District' as being arbitrary and unconstitutional'

2. lt is the case of the petitioner that she is the absolute owner and possessor of Plot No'86' admeasuring 276 square yards, in Survey No'238 of Puppalaguda Village' Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' having purchased the same under registered sale deed bearing document No'4541 of 2013 dated 24.O6.2}13from the previous owner Smt' B' Balamani' who had title to the property under registered sale deed bearing document No.7312 of 2003 dated 29'09'2003' lt is stated that the petitioner is resident of East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh' Taking advantage ofherabsence,respondentNos6andThavetrespassedintothe saidPlotanddemolishedthecompoundwallandraisingamulti- .@ . \-::,i?al?::. }\. - \'t:'.\ v, \ 2 storied RCC structure without sanctioned permission or approval from the GHI\4C. ln that connection, the petitioner issued legal notice/representation dated 11.og.2ozs to respondent Nos.2 and 3 requesting them to take action regarding unauthorised construction made by respondent Nos.6 and 7 over the subject property, but so far action is not taken.

3. Heard Ms. A. Satyasiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5, and perused the materiar available on record. 4 Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5 submitted that appropriate action will be taken on the legal notice/representation dated 11.Og.2O2Sof the petitioner

5. ln view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 _ Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad, to forthwith take action on the legal notice/representation of the petitioner dated 1 1.Og.2025, for removal of structures allegedly made without any sanctioned plan by respondent Nos.6 and 7 in plot No.g6, Survey No.23B, 3 Puppalaguda Village, Serilingampally Zone' Ranga Reddy District, by issuing prior notice and affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent Nos'6 and 7' and pass orders in accordance with law' This exercise shall be completed within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Notice to respondent Nos 6 and 7 is dispensed with as this order is passed without entering into the merits of the case. However, if respondent Nos'6 and 7 have any grievance regarding this order, they are at liberty to seek modification of this order. No order as to costs' As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions' if any' pending in this writ Petition stand closed. I 1 //TRUE COPY// SD/.P .GOWRI SHANKAR EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To

2. J.

5. A Urban DeveloPment bad. erabad. er and Director of Municipal Administration (CDil/A)' AC The PrinciPal Secretary, MuniciP al Administration Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at H The Commissioner, Greater HYd erabad MuniciPa Corporation (GHMC), Tank Bund Road, HYd The Commission Guards, Masab Tank, HYd erabad The DeP uty Comm issioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation' SerilingamP ally Zon e, Hyd erabad. The Assistant CitY Planner, SerilingamPallY Circle, GHMC, Hyderabad Two CCs to GP FO R MCPL ADMN AND U RBAN DEVELOP MENT, H igh Court for the State of Telang ana at HYdera bad. [oUTl SATYASIRI, Advocate [OPUC] MADHUSUD HAN REDDY, Advocate (OPUC)

7. One CC to Ms. A 8. One CC to SRI G 9. Two CD CoPies SA/BSK I :./ r\i S f c 7:€ I ',,'\: .,, \ c tt) r., 1- 20 [ll$ ?ffi HIGH COURT DATED:2010812025 ORDER WP.No.247O3 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \)_=