The High Court · 2025

3. Smt. Akula Sandya Rani, Wo. Pranay Veer, Aged about 31 Yrs, Occ. House Wife, R/ o. H. No. 9-1633, YSR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (tt/), It/edak Dist.

4. Smt. Akula Shashi Rekha, Wo. Vinay Veer, Aged.about 27 Yrs, Occ. House Wife, Rl/o. H.No. 9-1633, YSR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (M), Medak Dist. ...Petitioners/Accused No.l to 4 in CRLP and l.A.No.4 ot 2025 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, Honourable High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad ...Respondent in CRLP and l.A.No.4 of 2025

2. Ghanapuram Sruthi Nayana, D/o. Srinivas, Age. 21 Yrs, Occ. Beautician, fuo. Anila Deluxe Women's PG Hostel, Addagutta, KPHB, Hyderabad. Native of Bhagath Singh Colony, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant in CRLP and l.A.No.4 of 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceeding against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 in PRC No. 25 of 2025 for the alleged offence Under Section 64 (1), 127 (2), 77, 115 (2) & 352 of BNS pending on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial of cases under PCR Act Cum ll Addl. Junior Civil Judge, At. Sanga Reddy. - ) l.A. NO: 2OF 11025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to :;tay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 in PRC No.25 of J025 for the atleged offence Under Section 64 (1), 127 (2),77, 115 (2) & 352 of BNS pending on the fite of Special Judicia Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial of cases under PCR Act Cum ll Addl. Jrnior Civil Judge, at Sanga Reddy pending Csposal of the above criminal petitior . l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 BETWEEN: Ghanapuranr Sruthi Nayana, D/o. Srinivas, Age.21 Yrs, Ocr; Beautician, R/o. Anila Deluxe Women's PG Hostel, Addagutta, KPHB, Hyderabad. Native of Bhagath Sinr;h Colony, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/2nd RespondenUDe-facto Complainant AND

1. Akula Prirnay Veer @ Pranay Veer Reddy, S/o. Vijay Kumar Akula, Aged about 31 Yrs, Occ. Business, Rt/o. H.No. 9-1633, YSR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (M), Medak Dist

2. gmt. Kavtha Jyothi Kore Pramod, D/o. K.P. Pramodha Rao, Aged about 51 Yrs, Occ House Hold, R/o. H.No. 9-1633, YSR Cotony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (M), Ivedak Dist. 3 Smt Akula Sandya Rani, W/o. Pranay Veer, Aged about 31 yrs, Occ. House Wife, R/ o. H.No. 9-1633, YSR Colony, Boltarbm (V), J nnaram (M), Medak Dist

4. Smt. Akul: Shashi Rekha, W/o. Vinay Veer, Aged about 27 Yrs, Occ. House Wife, R:/o H.No. 9-1633, YSR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (tr/), Medak Dist ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4

5. Th-e State c'f Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, Honourable High Court of Telanga na, Hyderabad ...RespondenURespondent Petition ur der Section 359(6) of BNSS R/w 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances s ated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Cr.iminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/ 2nd R espondenuDefacto Complaint to conrpromise the offence with the Respondents/P etitioner/Al1 to 44 in FIR No. 184 of 2)24 on the file of p.S IDA Bo aram, Sanga Reddy District for the alleaged offences Under Section 64 (1'), 127 (2), 77, 115 (2) 86 352 of BNS pending as PRC No. 25 of 2025 on the file of Special Judicial li4agistrate of First Class(Mobile)forTrialofcasesUnderPCRActCumllAddl.JuniorCiVilJudge,at Sanga ReddY. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 PetitionunderSection359(2)ofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminalf etition, the High court may be pleased to record to compromise with Respondent/ Defacto Complaint to iompouno the offence with the Respondent No.1 to 4/petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 in FIR No. 184 oI 2024 on the file of P.s. IDA Bollaram, Sanga Reddy District for tnl atieaged offences Under Section 64 (1), 127 (z),77, 115 (2) & 352 of BNS p";Oi^g i. enC No. 25 of 2025 on the fiie of Special Judicial Magistrate of First biass t"frrf oOif et for Trial of cases under PCR Act Cum ll Addl. Junior Civil Judge, At. Sanga Reddy. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gafar Mahammad, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla' Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No 1 and of M/s Kothapalli Jhanshi Rani, Advocate for the Respondent No 2' The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I r THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETIT ION No.10714 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 under Section 528 of BNSS,2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in P.R.C.No.25 of 2025 on the file of the Special Jurlicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial of Cases under PCll Act-cum-ll Additional Junior Civil Judge, at Sanga Reddy, re3istered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 127(2),77, 115(2),352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'ENS').

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/€rccused Nos.1 to 4 as well as respondent No.Zlde facto complainanl that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties lrave compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2Oil5 have been filed seeking permission to compromise the matter and t: record the compromise.

3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. 2 T7D, J Crlp_10714 2025

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that he has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to setfle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders daled 22.08.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submifted a report dated 03.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have wiilfuily and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of ZO25 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in P.R.C.No.25 0f 2025 0n the fire of the speciar Judiciar Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial of Cases under pCR Act_cum_ 3 Crlp 10711 2D5 ll Additiorral Junior Civil Judge, at Sanga Reddy, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4, are hereby quashed subject to the petitic ners/accused Nos.1 to 4 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees :ive Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabarl and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks frorr today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. B.REKHA RANI I$TANT REGISTRAR ASS \ ----' qECTtON OFFTCER To, 2 3 4 5

6. 7 8. ADK The Spe:ial Judicial Maoistrate of First Class (Mobile) ror I rial of cases under poR Acr Cum rr eial. .lunior crirlriiJ,'", s]ilra neooy The Judi:iat First Ctass Magistratetcu; Sp,rtlifr,r""U,il ,, Sangare(ldy ""rn The Prinr:ipal District and Sessions Judge, Sanoareddv rhe station House officer ?1p"r;#iJ;K"illl Sangars(jy Iyr"":rt;:iff Pubric Prosecutor, Hish c"rriloit 9"" 99 trr S-i Gafar Mahammad, Advocate [OpUCI one cc ro M/s. Korhaoali .haniili n""i niJJ"Jt"'iopu"l Two CD Copies " state o1 reransana ar Along with a copl ,,f Joinr mcmo of Compromise. Note: Total Amo_rnt of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid bv Sri Gafar Mahammad counser ror tne pe,tionJr' "Jili'"","0 bv the Hon,bre court vide order dated 16-0g-202s as ns s,oool_l'rir*J i:r" thor sand onty ) to the Hish_Court Lesat^Services Co;ri'r"d;"Hlgn co,,.: for rhe Stare of i:,"^1"11rr, lerangana and Rs. 5.000/_ / Rupees Five th"r.r"i f " e Bar Association. Memo as proor or "orpii"I"J r:i3 usn No 105303 ot 2o2i H,1oi?:3r%.rried "",r, HIGH COURT DATED:'l 610912025 COMMOhI ORDER !.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.10714 of 2025 tl'lf- a\ .-:-:-- - :-- y-. ' il,i '.1 i. , iL - 'r "'' " ''t_ ' ,i,... .J ) I n Il ?[6 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND tA.NOs.3 & 4 OF ZOzs 0\ v 1\ IN THE HtrcH couRT o?_!_Trrr srATE OF TELANGAN.{;; AT:: HYDERABAD I.A. No. CRL. P.No. oF 2o2s oF 20/25 1 BETIIIEEN: (1) (2) (3) (4) $:,?,,T*:, Yeer @ pranziy Veer Reddy, D/ o. vuay Kumar Akula, Aged about 31 yrs, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No: 9-1633, ySR Colony, J Boltaram (V), Jinnaram (M), M;dak Dist. lyt flvittra Jyothi Kore pramod, D/o. K.P. Pramodha Rao, lgea-1b9ut 51 yrs, Occ: House l{old, R/.o. H.No: 9-1633, ySR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram 1U;, Uliat Oist. Smt. Akula Sandya Rani, W/o. Pranay Veer, Aged,about 31 yrs, Occ: House ,.,Vife, R/.o. H.No: 9-1633, ySR Cotony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram (M), M;(hk Dist _Smt. Akula Shashi Rekha, W/o. Vinay Veer, Aged_about 2Z yrs, Occ: House iVife, R/o. H.No: 9-1633, ySR Colony, Bollaram (V), Jinnaram lrrf;, Ueitat nist. .:.Petitioners/Accused No. I to 4 AND I I I I 1 2 The State of Telangana, I"p Uy its public prosecutor, Hon'ble High Court of Telangan;r,Hyderabad. Ghanapuram Sruthi Nayala, D/o. Srinivas Age: 21 Yrs, Occ: Beautician, R/o. Anila Deluxe Women,s pG Hostei, Addagurta, I(pHB, Hyderabad. N.ative of Bhagath Singh Colony, FiIm Nagar, Hyderabad. . .. Respondent .. Respondent/ Defacto_Complainant JoIN" 11sMO { it is su rrnitted that the present joint rnemo is being fileci herewith by both the parties to compoUnd the offence brtrveen the Defacto- Complainant/2.d Respondent and the Petitioners / A ccused No. 1 to 4 as the matter is; settled out of Honble Court amicably. As submitted the Afhdavit hlerl by the Defecto Cornplainant/2"d Respondent herein, as such this Ho rble Court may be pleased to quash tlxr Proceedings in PRC No. 25 of 2025 on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial oi cases under PCR Act Cum Ii Addl. Junior Civil Judge, At: Se nga Reddy. For the rcasons stated above it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pIt ased to perrnit the Petitioner/2na Respondent/Defacto Complairit tr compound the offence with the Respondent No. 1 to 4/Petitioners/Accuseci No.l to 4 in FIR No. 184 of 2024 on the file of P.S. IDA Bollaram, Sanga Reddy Dlstrict for the alleaged offences Under Section 64 (1), 127 (2), 77, 115 (2) & 352 of tsNS per.rding as PRC No. 25 of 2025 on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate o1'First Class (Mobile) for Trial of (ases under PCR Act (lum II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, At: Sanga Reddl , and pass other order or orders, which may be deemed frt and proper in the circrrmstance of the case. 1 s N4 2 v \._n ( S44z' 3 4 Petitioner;/A1 to ,{4 Counsel for ePe oners/Al to A4 xd^ Defacto-com:lainant 2"d Respond r.tl Hyderabad Dt: 19-O8-2O25 Counsel for t c 2"4 Respondent/ Defacto- Complainant