✦ High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,066 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents no. 2 and 3 herein in interfering into the petitioner property i.e., H.No. 1-1-4618,11, measuring 266.66 sq. Yards in Sy.No. 351 situated at Old Housing board colony, Adilabad, Adilabad District with the instance of 4th and 5th respondent-cand threatening the petitioner by calling to the police station and trying to detain the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, and contrary to the principles of naturaljustice and violative of Art.3 00- A of Constitution of lndia and consequentially direct the respondent no. 2 and 3 not to interfere into the a petitioner property and not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due procedure of law + .s -.(i tr' i;. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerJ in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the resprondent no. 2 and 3 not to interfere into the a petitioner property and not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due procedure of law, during ;rencling disposal of the writ petition in the interests of justice Counselfor the Petitioner: SRl. SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: sRl M. sRlNlvAS, AGp FoR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5:-- The Court marJe the following: ORDER t t + + + + * I f i; + + f *, THE HONOURABLE SRI IUS.I.ICIT N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WIIIT PETITION N 9t.?M!_ ot_ZO2S. ORDER: Hearcl learned counsel for the pctitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assisttrnt Cot,ernment Pleader for I{orr).-. .rr:f rai}1ing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. \\'ith thr:ir conserlt, ihis r.t'rit pctitior.r 5 .'ing taken up lor disposal at the acirn ission stage itself .

2. 'l'his n'rit petition has [.,cen filetl s,rt,i<ing the following prayer:- "ltt dtclnrc tlrc tu'litttt tt.l' tlrc ft,:,)ttr li,nt Nos.2 and 3 lrcrein itt intt:r.fi'rittg inlo Llr pclilittnt'r proltt't t rr t,., FI.No.1-7-46/8/1 rueasuring 266.66 sq. Yards in Sy.No.357 sittt,ut,l nt Old Housing bonrd colonry, Adilubatl, Adilnbnd District toith tlu' itt:;tonce of 4ttr and Stt, responderils antl tlrentening thc petitioner bq cnllitlt lo tlrc police statiort nnd trying to detuin tlrc pctitiorter as ilk:gtl nrbilt.irt'tt unlmoftl and contrary to tlrc princiylas of ttnturul "lustice nrul t,ir,ltrii,i t of ArL. 300-A o.i Constitutiott o.[ lntlit tttul L()tlsc(.lrLentinllry diret-t |t,.. tt'spondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interJt:re into tlrc petitioner pro1tertil rr;t,! not to call tlrc petitioner to tlrc police sttttion tuitlrcut follotoittg duc prt',:edr.tre oJ lau,."

3. . []rie.f i.rcts startcrl in this vvr:it pctili,)ir rur€ that the petitioner claims to be thc absolute or.vner o[ thc [ [.No.] -1-.1(:,';i l, admeasuring 266.66 Sq.Yards irr Survey No.351, situatcd at Olcl I'lor.rsirr,5 lloard Colony, Adilabad, having acquired the same through Registerr:d sarit: cleed bearing document No.1325 of 2022 rlated 28.06.2022. 'l'he case cll: the pciii i()ner is that the respondent No.5 is intcrtering with thc petitioner's posscssir-)n over the subject propertv, hence, tlre petitioner has filed O.S.No.-l of 2022, pencling on the file of learned Senior \ \\ Civil fudge-Curn-Assistant Sessions Ju,ti1,,', Adilabad. Further, the case of the petitioner is that on t0.0tl.2t)25, thc rr.i;)()ndent Nos.4 and 5 callecl the petitioner to Police Station and tll'catened him to settle the issue with the respondent No.5. Aggrieved by thc sanre, this writ petition is filed

4. Leanled Assistant Governirier-rt i)leader for: Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 placec{ orr ri'c'orcl instructions issued bv the Station House Officer, PS Adilabacl-1 "fol rr, ,,\clilabad Dish'ict, whereirr it is statecl that on 05.08.2025 a comp.rlaint ir,rs beeu rcceivecl frorn resp'ronL{gnt No.5 alleging that the petitioner has illcl,,allv t'rccupiecl the Govemment land situated at Old Housing Board, Arlilabarl, rvhich r,rras given to thc Red Cross Society. Thereafter, rcsprotrcletrt \t'..\ f'gr the purprosc 9l' cnquiry l'rad called the petitioner to the police statiorr. lt is further submittecl that neither the responclent authorities are intcrfr-'rinii with the pctitioner's possession nor they are frr:que.ntlv calling the petiiit,nt.r to I)olice Station.

5. Recording the subrnissions ttrade bv learncd courrsel appearing on either side and without exprressinll arr',' opinion on thc merits of the case this writ petiticn is disposed of ciirectir',', Ilre resporrc{ent authorities to follovv due Process as contemplated uucler lau, bt:l'orc initiating anv action on petitioner.

6. wi':h the above direction, this r.vrit pretitior-r is disposed of. Miscellan,:ous applications, if anr' 1.r'r1,lipo, shall stancl closccl. No order as to 'ii .i t f costs. To, //TRUE COPYII -SD/-C. DEEPIKA STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER T.S,H'yderabad. 1- The. F'rincipal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, ?. Ife Quperintendent of potice, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 3. The station House officer. l rown p.s Adilabad. Adilabad District. 4- one cc to SRl. soMA RAVI KTRAN REDDY Advocate topucl 5. Two ccs to GPfoR HofuE ,High court for the state of telanSjana at 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUI I BM BS * II I '+ i t .i. t I I t t I t .+ *. '{r * {ti' },J ,,# ,+ .niir. \ \ 1 \ HIGH COURT DATED:2810812025 ORDER WP..No.24678 of 2025 ? o() lHE S t: v1 0 5 i,ilifl 2026 * * I, I { t f I l f f; I I .ii: + \ \ ,! t t P

11. '! T DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS A ,"b

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments