The High Court · 2025

2. Smt.Valki Lalitha, Wo. Mahesh Age. 45 yrs, Occ. Sanitary Work R/o' Jamamasiid, Nalgonda District.

3. Maram Nagamani, Wo. Saleem Age. 30 yrs, Occ. Sanitary Work Rio' Savarkarnagar, Nalgonda District.

4. Boda Janaki, Wo. lsthari Age. 35 yrs, Occ. Sanitary Work R/o H No 6-2-349, Srinagar Colony Hyderabad Road, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENT'DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding in c.c.No. 1204 of 2024, pending on the file of lll Addl.Junior civil Judge-cum- lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First class, Nalgonda District. At Nalgonda., for the offences punishable offences U/sec. 386 r/w.109 l.P.C against the petitioner/Accused No. 1, herein. t.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Between:

1. Smt.Valki Lalitha, Wo. Mahesh Age. 45 yrs, Occ. Sanitary Work R/o' Jamamasjid, Nalgonda District.

2. Maram Nagamani, Wo. Saleem Age 30 yrs, Occ. Sanitary Work R/o' Savarkarnagar, Nalgonda District.

3. Boda Janaki, Wo. lsthari Age. 35 yrs. Occ sanitary Work R/o' H No' 6-2-349' Srinagar Colony Hyderabad Road, Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER/EFACTO COMPLAINANTS AND

1. The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature For the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

2. Devireddy Swamy Reddy @Dereddy Swamy Reddy, S/o Late.Dereddy Ram Reddy Age. 63 yrs, Occ. Business R/o. H.No 1-10-4, Ashoknagar Musheerabad HYderabad. ...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED No. 1 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/RespondenUAccused No.1, to file the compromise petition in c.c.No 1204 of 2024 pending on the file of lll Addl.Junior civil Judge-cum-lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First class, Nalgonda District. At Nalgonda. t. A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the tvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 1204 ol 2024 pending on the file of lll Addl.Junior Civil Judge-Cum- lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nalgonda District. At Nalgorrda., against the respondentiAccused. no. 1 ., in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respon dent/accu sed No. 1. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the f\Iemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S SOMESHWAR RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 2. and of Sri D. Praveen Kumar, Advocate for the ResPondent No' 2' The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2O25 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION N o.10699 ot 2025 COMMON RDER: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in C.C.No.1204 of 2024, on the file of the lll Additional Junior civil Judge-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nalgonda District, regislered for the offence punishable under Section 386 read with 109 lpC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 to 4 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. The learned Additional Public prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition.

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders dated 22.0g.2025 fI 2 ETD. J Crlp _10699 -202 5 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court. Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 08.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ol 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.1204 of 2024, on the file of the lll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nalgonda District, registered against the petitioner/accused No.1 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S81N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.S,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, Hyderabad, within a 3 ( o 10699 l0)5 period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. N.SRIHARI UTY REGISTRAR ,PE //TRUE COPY// SE TION OFFICER To, ,, Ill.r 3,411'li""ffliJ!'Bi"t',:l'oi1ut",nt"?,T; ril Additionar Judiciar Masistrate or 2 The station riouse office, Nalgonda , Town porice station, Nalgonda Distict ' Iff":"?:JiJt"r;'0"" Prosecutor, Hish court ror the state or reransana at 4. One CC to Sri S. Someshwar Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to Si D. praveer n Kumar' Advocate IoPUCi 6. Two cD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) p VI I/PSI- NOTE: Total Amount of Rs 10,000A ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by sri s someshwar Rao, counser for the petitioner as directed by the Hon,bre court vide order dated 11.0g.2025 as Rs. S,OOO/_ ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director' sainik werfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the Telangana State Leoal Scnrina" a,,+r.,^-;... ,, proor orcomp,iance USR -:Til::'rillllL?;:."Ji;l"' rired Memo as HIGH COURT DATED: 1110912025 COMMON ORD NO: 1 AND I IN/AND E 2 oF 2025 CRLP.No.10699 ot 2025 ( J o() -;':7::=:::-- .6f: Sir'ri>.* N[\l ?ffi j, .a- + n l-.,j;:r.Ta ,,,J)_ LLOWING THE CRIM!NAL PETITION q { t6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. of 2025 Between: 1). Smt.Vatki LalithaW / o. Mahesh Age: 45 yrs, Occ: Sanitar5r Work R/o. Jamamasjid, Nalgonda District. 2). Maram Nagamani W/o. Saleem Age: 30 yrs, Occ: Sanitary Work R/o. Savarkarnagar, Nalgonda District. 3). Boda Janaki W /o.Isthari Age: 35 yrs, Occ: Sanitar5r Work R/o. H.No. 6-2-3+9, Srinagar Colony HyderabadRoad, NalgondaDistrict. ...Petitionerf Defacto Complainants AND I The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature For the State of Telangana at Hyderabad Respondent/Respondent 2 Devireddy Swamy Reddy @Dereddy Swamy Reddy S/o. Late.Dereddy Ram Reddy Age: 63 yrs, Occ: Business R/o. H.No. 1-10-4, Ashoknagar Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ftt- l'j )V aVa*^-"r^i ...Respon dent I Accused.no. 1 V'v ut </ b **a 17 JO MEMO FILED RESPONDENT o May it piease your Honour; It is submitted that as per the advice of the elders and r,vell wishe.rs, the matter heis been compromised out of the court between ihe respondent/defacto complainant and victims and petitioner/accused no.1, and the in pursuance of the said compromise the respondent/detacto-complainant and the Victims has agreed to withdraw the case and hence no objection to quash the the proceedings in C.C.N o. l2O4 of 2024 pending on the file III Addl.Junior Civil Judge- Cum- III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nalgonda District: At Nalgonda., against the respondent/Accused.no' 1' Hence, it is prayed that the Honble Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. L2O4 of 2024 pending on the file oi III Addl.Junior Civil Judge-Cum- III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nalgonda District: At Nalgonda., against the respondenti Accused.no.1., in view of ttre compromise entered bet"veen the petitioners and respondent/accused No. 1, in the interest of justice and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Courl deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. LrrE Ld's'' , u ,9 d Defeto complainant A t. N+ Victim No.l- S/i. Nagf t n^r? Victime No! U j,"\rh{ Date:f? -08-2025 (lou.nsel for Petitioner/ Defacto complainant/Victims Place: Hyderabad COUNSEL FOR sPoNDBNT/ACCUSED NO' l"