✦ Telangana High Court · 02 Mar 2026

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited v. Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad

Writ Petition No. 20626 of 2023SRIAPARESH KUMAR SINGH, G M MOHIUDOIN149 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151

Key paragraphs

Para 1212. Aggrieved by such categoriz, ation, 103 employees filed fresh writ petitions, leading to the impugned common order dated 3O.O8.2O24. The learned Single Judge, upon examining certain individual cases, including that of a petitioner who had suffered amputation of the right leg above knee level…

Read the judgment Find similar cases

Judgment

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20221 ot 2023, pending disposal of the wdt appeal. Counsel for the ,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR irlEDlCAL HEALTH & FW l3 "NO= 47O Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.2O428 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

Doddilla Madanaiah, S/o Doddilla Yadaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- General Mazdoor, E.C.No.929482, Mine: GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RGl, Fl/o. H.No.1 4352, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20428 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. AODL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW t4 WRIT APPEAL | 4750F 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order dated 30-08-2(t24 in W.P.No.2O777 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: '1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries, Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departmr:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

The Gerreral Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Companl, Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District. AND ..APPELLANTS

1. Dongala Mallaiah, S/o. Dongala Lingaiah, aged about 69 years, Occ. Ex- Support t\Ian, E.C.No. 1194909, Mine: GDK-S lncline, RG-|, R/o. H.No.210, Laxmipuram, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition uncrer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20777 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL RED O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SPL. GP, attached to the Counsel for the Flespondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW t5 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the Order Dated 3OlOBl2O24 in W.P.No.1974O of 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District AND .APPELLANTS

1. G. l(anakaiah, S/o.Ramaiah aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Motor Mechanic E.C.No. 2264854 Mine: Area Workshop, Mandamarri Area, H.No. Q.No. D- 496, l-Zone, Mancherial District.

2. The Medicat Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2fl24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19740 of 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW l6 itrlrlll PEAL NO:479 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order dated 30/08/2C,24 in W.P.No.2O278 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu, lem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries; Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District. AND .APPELLANTS

1. G Sadashivam, S/o. Rajaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-EP Electrician, E.C.No.862915 Mine: GDK OC-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Rl/o. H.No.T2-194, Thi!ak Na,3ar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana t.A- ...RESPONDENTS Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstiances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ. Petition No. 20278 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the r{ppellants: SRI E SRI P SRI S.RAHUL O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SC FOR SCCL / SPL. GP, attached to the MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW t7 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the Order dated 30-08-2024, in WP.No.19660 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Bhupalapally Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Mamidi Rajaiah, S/o. Komuraiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. ExCoal Filler, E.C.No.1199250, Mine: VKP GDK9 lncline Ramagundam ll Area, R/o. 11521A 30 ward Kalvasrirampur Srirampur Mandal Manchierial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19660 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW t8 APPEAL NO:488 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2Cr24 in WP.No.3O622 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managirg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Dire, ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu, Jem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierie:; Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,3nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The Gereral Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District. 't. Ponnam Rayamallu, S/o.Ponnam Ramaswamy, aged about 65 years, Occ. Valve Operator, E.C.No. 870798, Mine: Civil, RG-|, R/o. H.No.15-1-188, Tilak Nagar, Ramagundam , Peddapalli District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 30622 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel for the r\ppellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SC FOR SCCL / Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW l9 W r{rT ap P E A r- " N 6ff{6UffE.,H2tr2s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefterc Patent preferred against the order dated 3010812024 in the W.P.No.19798 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfarc and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Namasani Narsaiah, S/o.Namsani Ramaiah, aged about 69 yearc, Occ. Ex- Gen. Maz., E.C.No. 1191969, Mine: GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RG-|, R/o. Santhosh Nagar, GV-8 lncline, Karimnagar District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. .RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition. No. 19798 of 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL counsel for the Respondent No.1: sRl L.RAVICHANDER, sr. couNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN 20 Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRITAP NO:490 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2C24 in W.P.No.19642 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren i Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company' Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Karimnagar District.

1. Paranandi Ramaiah, S/o. Paranandi Durgaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Haulage tJperator, E.C.No. 922472, Mine: GDK 2 & 2A lncline, RG-|, Fl/o. H.No.8-1-278, Hanuman Nagar, Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

2. The Medi,:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. PONDENTS Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19642 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel for the r\ppellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Gounsel for the flespondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 2l Wnrr AppEAt- :491OF 2O25 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O441 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District,

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District. ENT,]

1. Atla Mallaiah, S/o. Atla Lingaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex- General Manager, E.C.No. 930302, Mine - GDK-S lncline, RG-|, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.9-7-442, Viltal nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20441 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, SLI*IilllllliFIIA SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR SCCL / Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 22 492 Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Lefters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.2024 in Writ Petition No.20197 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between

1. The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companv Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area Area, Peddapalli District

1. Gandu Prrshamallu, S/o. Narsaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No.939974, Mine: GDK OC-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Ri/o. H.No.10-2'.-17 4ll, Erlapalle, Kamanpur Mandat, Peddapalti District

2. The Medi,:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitat, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana a ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20197 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel for the l\ppellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ' Counsel forthe Flespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Gounsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 23 oF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.1 9652 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District

1. Vemulawada Laxman, S/o. Nagaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-EP Operator, E.C.No1426429, Mine GDK OC I Ramagundam-3 Area, R/o. H.No. 1 9-3-5/1, Marandeya Colony, Ramagundam Madal, Peddapalli District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. .RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ. Petition No. 19652 oi 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. OOUNSEL, REP. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADOL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRITAPPEAL O:,614 OF 2025 24 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent appeal preferred against the order date<l3OlOBl2O24 in W.P.No.20228 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Dire, ctor, (PA and W) The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagiklem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departm,3nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. AND

1. Sri Devasani Sailu, S/o. Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-pump Operator, E.C.No.02250693, Mine: KKS lncline MM Area, R/o. H.No. 7-26i, 3rd Zone, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. t.A. NO: ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20228 of 2023, pending disposal of the wit appeal. Counsel forthe, Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REOOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the ll.espondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 25 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in the W.P.No.19174 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. ...APPELLANTS

1. Kanthala Mohan Reddy, S/o. Muthi Reddy, aged about 63years, Occ. Ex- Trammer, E.C.No. 2622604 , Mine: RK6 lncline, Srirampur Area, KD156, Krishna colony, Srirampur Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19174 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. OOUNSEL' REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ' Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL O: 621,OF 26 Writ Appreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20680 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managin,3 Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu<lem, Khammam District.

3. The Gen,:ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companl, Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren Bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (tiCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. ...APPELLANTS AND 1 . Byram Mallaiah, S/o. Venkaty, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. :2865587 Mine: RKNT lncline Srirampur Area, Fi/o. Mancherial District.

2. The Medi:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaracr Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. F 202s ...RESPONDENTS Petition unrler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s.upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20680 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the dppellants: Rl E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. s s s O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL RI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / Rl S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 27 c Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.2O652 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Kharnmam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, C,orporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District. ANIj] '1. Pittala Rajaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 67 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2759312, Mine: RK-Tlncline Srirampur Area, FUo. H.No. 'l-90, Laxmipur, Mankondur, Laxmipur, Karimnagar District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. n Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstrances stated in the affldavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20652 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP' SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW 28 AL NO: 2025 Writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the Order datd 24-09-2()24 in WP.No.3693 ot 2024 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu, Jem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The Ger, eral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. ..APPELLANTS

1. Sadala Pentaiah, S/o. Lachaiah, EC No.2541727, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, SRP Area, Mine.RK-S, Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), tUo. KD522, Krishna Colony, Mancherial Srirampur Colony, Aditabad Flictriar

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENTS NO: 3 OF 20 Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petltion, the High Court may be pteased to suspend the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 3693 of 2024. pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the r{ppellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 29 Writ Appeal under clause '15 of the Letters Patent prefeffed against the oder dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O511 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. ENI'

1. Late Sri Boina lGnakaiah, S/o. Komaraiah, Occ. Ex- Supportman, E.C.No. 2803080, Mine: RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, Fl/o. H.No.7-130, ASPR Nagar, Teengalpahad, Srirampur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.20511 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRIP,SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 30 NO:641 OF 2025 Writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19411 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The Gen,:ral Manager (Perconnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren'Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District. AND

1. Mogili Rajamallu, S/o.lylaiah, aged about 67 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2850053 Mine RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o. D-1812, Shirkey, Mancheri:rl District.

2. The Medir:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, rep. by its Superintencjent, Padmarao Nagar, Secundrabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19411 ot 2023, pending disposal of the wr t appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E. SRI P. SRI S. O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL LRE SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / IIIOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SPL. GP, attached to the Counsel for the Flespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the R.espondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 3l Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O341 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District AND APPELLANTS

1. Suramalla Ratnaiah, S/o. Dhataiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- Supportman, E.C.No. 2624842, Mine . KK-1 lncline , R/o. H.No. 13-440, Shanthi Nagar, Kythanpalli, Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20341 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: E P s .MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. .SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / .RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW 32 PEAL NO: 646 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19755 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagurlem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieriesr Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), :Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

1. Sri Thotler Jayanna, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex4oal Cutter, 8.C.No.2ti25563, Mine: Rk-6 lncline SrirampurArea, Fi/o. H.No.1-3, Narsapur Colony, D,andepalli, Adilabad District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, rep. by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. 30F 202s ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19755 ol 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / s O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the Counsel for the llespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 33 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No. 20443 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. ENIj]

1. Sri. Nannavena Saraiah, S/o. Kanakaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex- lncline Srirampur Area, Rl/o. General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 2fi2550, Mine: Rk€ 1 0-73, Kythanpally, Ramakrishnapur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 .RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20443 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REOOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. Sl iIfeIIEIIImflIrlt'InN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 34 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in the W.P.No.20206 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. 1 . The Sir, gareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W). The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companlr Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited ({iCCL), Mandamarri Area, Adilabad District. E[IT'

1. Embadi Lingaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Ex- Trammer, E. C. No. 2081426, Mine: KK- 1 lncline , R/o. Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20206 of 2022, pending disposal of the wit appeal. Counsel forthe, Appellants: SR! E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SR! HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 35 6iiii Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19882 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. AND ..APPELLANTS

1. Chekka Lingaiah, S/o Rajaiah Occ. Ex-General Mazddor, Mandamani Area, E.C.No.2296217, Mine: Shanthikhani Rio. H.No. 32-50, Mandamarri, District. Mancherial.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19882 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC SRI S.RAHUL RED O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL n SPL. GP, attached to the NSEL, REP. sccL / Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Gounsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 36 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.20866 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managirg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Direrctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothaguCem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierie:; Company. Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. 1 . Maraboina Komuraiah, S/o. Balaraju, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex- Supportnran, E.C.No. 228O7O3, Mine: KK-1 lncline, Mandamani Area, R/o.Mandamani Mandal, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medicai Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana oF 2025 ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srupport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the oder dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20866 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the ,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SR! S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 37 WRITAPPEAL Eta Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P No.20235 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. 1 . Kummari Kistaiah, S/o.Ankulu, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Electrician Helper, E.C.No.2781872, Mine: RK-S lncline, SrirampurArea, R/o. H.No. 19- 218, Ramnagar, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. KT+T{oIttrilfE Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20235 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SG FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIIAPPEAL. i 672 38 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19639 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Compan,T Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (liCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District. EIIT'

1. Rontala Gangaram, S/o. Komaraiah, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex- Lamp Room Attendant, E.C.No. 2203183, Mine: Kasipet-1 lncline, Mandamani Area, Rio H.No.7S-SRT, Bellampalli, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitai, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19639 ol 2023, pending disposal of the wnt appeal. Counsel forthe, Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ' Counsel forthe Respondent No.I: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 39 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order Dated 3048-2024 in W.P.No.19783 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. EtrE

1. Ch Rajaiah, S/o. Bheemaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Timberman, E.C.No.2754590, Mine. RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, Fl/o. H.No.2-3l5' Venkatapur, Mandamani (M), Mancherial District.

2. T|r- Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19783 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. @UNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SC FOR SCCL ' Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER' Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counset forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL 676 2025 40 Writ Apgreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No.19897 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companv Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), tSrirampur Area, Mancherial District. AND .APPELLANTS

1. Sri Chint; akindi Sheshagiri, S/o. aged about 63years, Occ. Head Overman, E.C.No. :2624842, Mine. RK6 lncline, Srirampur Area, R/o. 13-440, Shanti Nagar, K1{hampalli, Srirampur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Boad of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarar: Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2(t25 ...RESPONDENTS Petition un, ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ petition No. 19897 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe AppellanG: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, artached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW 4t Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dt.3OlOBl2O24 in the W.P.No.2O513 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District. D

1. Palle Rajaiah, S/o. Butchaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex- General Mazdoor, E. C. No. 2824303, Mine: RK- 8 lncline Srirampur Area, (Singareni Colleries Company Limited (SCCL) FJo. D- 1176, Godavari Colony, Naspur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstiances stated in the afflrdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20513 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. lforthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 42 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/20124 in W.P.No.19645 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Sin, Jareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Dire:tor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothaguclem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (S}CCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Gofte Raj; riah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 64 years, Occ- Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2842636, Mine: RKNT lncline, SrirampurArea, Rl/o. Mancherial District. 2. The Medi,;al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. 25 ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19645 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO: 4OF 20i25 Gotte Rajaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 64 years, Occ- Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2842636, l\iline: RKNT I ncline, Srirampur Area, Rl/o. Mancherial District. AND .PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. I

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing [)irector, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad. 43

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 686 ot 2025, dated 08.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW wRtr AFFE"ffi fr-iffi6ffiiF,2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the Oder Dated 3068/2024, in W.P.No.2O4N ot 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department' Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District. 44 AND ,..APPELLANTS

1. Late Suramalla Chinnaiah, S/o. Posham, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 2778895, Mine, RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o. H.No. 1 -:2 1 0, Mudigunta, Jaipur, Mancherial District.

2. The MeJical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep. by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF.2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20400 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR!P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 706 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19428 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Courr. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr:dem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The Gt:neral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. 45 AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Ankam Sammaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 2616205, Mine - RK-6 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o.16-101 , Ganesh Nagar, Naspur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19428 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Ankam Sammaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 2616205, Mine - RKS lncline Srirampur Area, R/o.16-101 , Ganesh Nagar' Naspur, Mancherial District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Dircctor, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS 46 Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order F,assed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2025 in, W.A. No. 706 of 2025, d,ated 09.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 709 oF 2025 writ Apceal under clause 15 of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-21)24, in WP.No.18925 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Directo(PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr.rdem Kammam District

3. The General Manager(Personnel), Welfare and CSR The Singareni Collieries Compa'ry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing Corporate personnel Department Singare ni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCI-) Srirampur Colony, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Nagunuri Saraiah, S/o Nagunuri Komuraiah Aged about Sg years Occ peon, E C No. 2861460 Area Workshop Srirampur Area, Rl/o Kg Colony Singapur Manchr:rial Srirampur Area Adilabad District.

2. The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad Telangana ...RESPONDENTS t.A. NO oF 2025 47 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated. 30-08-2024 passed in WP.No. 18925 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal. t.A. NO 40F 2025 Between: Nagunuri Saraiah, S/o Nagunuri Komuraiah Aged about 58 years Occ Peon, E C No. 2861460 Area Workshop Srirampur Area, Ri./o K8 Colony Singapur Mancherial Srirampur Area Adilabad District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills HSerabad

2. The Directo(PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem Kammam District

3. The General Manage(Personnel), Welfare and CSR The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing Corporate Personnel Department Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Srirampur Colony, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District 5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent Padmarao Nagar Sec, trnderabad Telangana (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No 709 ot 2025. dated '10.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO' Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN 48 Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT,APPEAL NO:7 110F 2025 writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters patent prefened Against the order Dated 30/08/2()24 in W.P.No.20273 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderab'ad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, a. lhe General Manager, Mandamani area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Sri Gurti lylaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No 2525365, Mine. KKS lnctine MM Area, Ri/o. D-324, A-Zone, Mancheriai District.

2. The Me:dical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, Rep by its superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. !.A. NO: 3 OF 202s ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated.30-08-2024 passed in writ petition no.2o2l3 ot 2023 in the interest of justice, penrling disposat of the writ appeal. Counsel for tltre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. Gp, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN 49 Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preffered Against the Order Dated 3010812024 in W.P.No.20189 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Peddapalli District AND ...APPELLANTS

1. [Vlutyam Devaiah, S/o.Rajaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Trammer E.C.No.02758617, Mine RR-7 Bpa Srirampur, Singareni Colleries company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.2910, Naspur, Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20189 of 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: Mutyam Devaiah, S/o.Rajaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Trammer E.C.No.02758617, Mine RR-7 Bpa Srirarnpur, Singareni Colleries company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.2910, Naspur, Nagarjuna Colony, lt/ancherial District 50 AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagurlem, Khammam District

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries; Company Limited (SCCL) welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm, ant, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The Gerreral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (TSCCL), Srirampur, Peddapalli District

5. The Meclical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 712 of 2O25, dated 10.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAo, sr. couNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, sr. CoUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW OF Writ Appeat under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 3010812024 in W.P.No.20209 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The singareni collieries company Limited, Rep by its chairman and Managingl Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direr:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District. 5l

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and GSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Adilabad District ENII]

1. Saga Mallaiah, S/o. Venkaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ- Ex-General Mazdoor, Mine SDL-RK7, Bellampalli Area, SCCL, Ri/o. Bellampalli' Mancherial District.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department' SingareniBhavan HYderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Adilabad District

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) 52 ...RESPONDENTS Petition r.rnder section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 713 of 2025, dated 10.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COIJNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW '4I writ Appeal under clause 1s of the Lefters patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20687 of ZO23 on the fite of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Dircctor (PA and W), The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothag,.rdem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and cSR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singanrni Bhavan Hyderabad, 4 Ln. Gglergl Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. AND

1. Chippakurthi Mallaiah, S/o. Peddulu, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex- Trammer, E. C. No. 1175515, Mine KK- 1 tnctine , R/o. H. No. 5- 99/1, Rapally, Mandanani Area, Mancherial District.

2. The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, Rep by its superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENTS 53 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20687 ot 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. LA. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Chippakurthi Mallaiah, S/o. Peddulu, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex- Trammer, E. C. No. 1175515, Mine KK- 1 lncline, R/o. H.No.5-99/1, Rapally, Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.l

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad'

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department' Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent' Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.M. 3ot 2025 in W.A. No' 7'14 ot 2025, dated 1 1.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI P.SR! HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr' COUNSEL' REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN 54 Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOTCAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEALNd:.?i 5'i5F-2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters patent preferred against the order Dated 30/08/2()24 in writ petition No.20257 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad Kothagu, dem, Khammam District.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) g. In9 Gr>neral Manager (Personnel), Wetfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departntent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, 4 Lh" G91_eg! Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Bomma Guruvaiah, S/o Bomma Durgaiah, aged about 66years, Occ- Ex-Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 422456, Mine -lK1A lncline, singareni Colleries Limited SCCL Srirampur Area,R/o. Mancherial, District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitat, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the'petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dater) 3oloal2o24 passed in writ petition No. 202s7 of 2023 in the interest, of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO:4 OF 2025 Between: Bomma Guruvaiah, S/o Bomma Durgaiah, aged about 66years, Occ_ Ex_Coal Cutter, E.C.No.422456, Mine -lK.lA lncline, Singareni Cotieries Limited SCCI Srirampur Area, R/o. Mancherial, District 55 AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medicat Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESFONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2O25 in W.A. No. 715 of 2025, dated 11.O7.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counset for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 3OtOBl2O24 in W.P.No.19650 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director, (PA & W) The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District. 56

3. The Gerneral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departnrent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited r'SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Minumula Ramchander, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 60 years, Occ. Ex-Coal Filler, E.C.No. 2613809, Mine: Kasipet-1 lncline, Mandamarn Area, R"yo. H.No. 1-26, Kondur, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19650 of 2o23 in the interest of justice, penrling disposal of the writ petition. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Minumula Ramchander, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 60 years, Occ. Ex-Coal Filler, E.C.No. 2613809, Mine: Kasipet-l lncline, Mandamarri Area, R/o. H.No. 1 -26, Kr>ndur, lvlancherial District. ...PETIT]ONER/RESPONDENT No. 1 AND '1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Dircctor, (PA & W) The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierit:s Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departrnent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, 4 I.h" Ge19g! Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company 5. The Modical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its superintendent, Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District. Padma.ao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. 57 (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in LA.No. 3 ot 2025 in W.A. No. 716 ot 2025, dated 11.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr' COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O515 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Dircctor, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Sri Madineni Posham , S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Timber, E.C.No. 2540569, Mine. Rk-6 lncline, Srirampur Area, R/o. H.No.4$7, Vempally, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS 58 l.A. NO: 3 OF 025 Petition r" nder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date(l 30.o8.2o24 passed in writ. Petition No. 20515 of 2023 in the interest of justice, pencling disposal of the writ appeal.

1.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Sri Madineni Posham, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Timber, E.C.No. 2540569, Mine. Rk-6 lncline, Srirampur Area, R/o. H.No.4-67, Vempal ly, Mancherial District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. 1 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Comparry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The Gr:neral Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padma'ao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not: necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition .rnder Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2o2s in w.A. No. 717 of 2025, datecl 1 1 .07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL 59 Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P No.19627 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Katla Rajaiah, S/o Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- General Manager, E.C.No. 2077477, Mine . KK-1 lncline , Fi/o. H.No. 5-49, Kasireddy Palli, Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19627 ot 2O23 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. 60 i 40F Katla Rajaiah, S/o Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- General Manager, E.C.No. 2077477, Mine . KK-1 lncline, Fl/o. H.No. S-49, Kasireddy palli, Mandanrarri Area, Mancherial District. AND NER/RESPONDENT No.1

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Din; ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The Gerreral Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareri Bhavan Hyderabad, 4 The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the af{idavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 728 ot 2025, daled 14.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENER.AL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 6l Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-2024 inW .P No. 3041 I ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District. APPELLANTS ENI'

1. Md. Vazeer, S/o. Late Hussaian, aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2587236, Mine. KK-1 lncline, Rl/o. Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Boad of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. 30F ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 30418 of 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ petition. oF 2025 Md. Vazeer, S/o. Late Hussaian, aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2587296, Mine. KK-1 lncline, Ri/o. Mandamarri Area' Mancherial District. AND PETITIONER/RESPONOENT No.1 62 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Din:ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu dem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Comparry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singarerri Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. Lh" Geleral Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited [SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 736 of 2025, dated 14.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRt E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for tlre Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW W-F{ii, APPEAL NO:737 0F 2025 writ Appeal under clause 1s of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19619 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and w), The singareni coilieries company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries compa ry Limited (sccL) werfare wing, corporate personier Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, 63

4. The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District. .APPELLANTS

1. Durgam Gangaram, S/o. Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ. Coal Cufter, E.C.No. 2043371, Mine. Kasipet-1 lncline, Mandamarri Area, Rl/o. 2-137' Pochamma Line, Tandur, Mancherial District.

2. fhe Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praytng that in the circumstances stated in the aftidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3o.o8.2o24 passed in writ Petition No. 196't9 of 2O23 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. o 40F Durgam Gangaram, S/o. Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ. Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 2043371, Mine. Kasipe!1 lncline, Mandamani Area, R/o. 2-'137' Pochamma Line, Tandur, Mancherial District. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1 D

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS 64 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No.3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 737 ot 2025, daled 14.07.2025, pending disposat of the writ appeal. Counsel forttre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forttre Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW 738 0F TIVF, writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 30.08.2()24 in writ Petition No. 1991 7 ot 2023 on the file of the High court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and. Managirrg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Coilieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and cSR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personiel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad +. Ih" Grilqql Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

1. Otla Jr;eva Ratnam, S/o.Rajaratnam, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex_ Supportman, E.C.No.020961 12, Mine . KKd tnctine MM Arei, Rfo. X.ruo. g_S_ 48, Sha:msheer Nagar, Mancherial District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 65 Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19917 ot 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO:4OF2025 Between: Otla Jeeva Ratnam, S/o.Rajaratnam, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- Supportman, E.C.No.020961 12, Mine . KKS lncline MM Area, R/o. H.No. 9-5- 48, Shamsheer Nagar, Mancherial District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and. Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2O25 in W.A. No. 738 ot 2025, dated 14.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Appellants: SRt E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SR! L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL' REP- SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN 66 Counsel for thre Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRlr APitEAI-NOi'i{5'oF 2b2s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19229 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Si,lgareni Collieries Company Limiteci, Rep by its Chairman and Managirrg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Din:ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

1. Shaik Gulam Rasool, S/o. Shaik Hyder, aged about 63 years Occ. MV DRlVEtt E.C.No.02991859, Singareni Cottories Co. Ltd., (SCCL) R/o D.134 CCC Colony, CCC Naspur, Adilabad District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19229 ot 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ petition. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: Shaik Gulam Rasool, S/o. Shaik Hyder, aged about 69 years Occ. MV DRIVER E.C-No.02991859, Singareni Coflories Co. Ltd., (SCCL) iVo O.te+ CCC Colony, CCC Nasp, ur, Adilabad District. AND ...PETtTtONER/RESpONDENT No.1 67

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department' Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District

5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent' Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l-A.No.3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 743 of 2O25, dated 15.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL' REP' SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ' Gounsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER' Sr. COUNSEL' REP' SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW ffit.?APFEAt NO:756 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the oder dated 30/08/2024inW.P No.19354 of 2023 on thefileof the HighCourt. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District-

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and cSR, The Singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department' SingareniBhavan HYderabad, 68

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited TiSCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. AND ...APPELLANTS '1. Karengula Rajaiah, S/o.Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Coal Cufter, E.C.No. 2825480, RK€lncline, Singareni Coileries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. e.No. ND-3031 , Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial, District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order daterl 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19354 ot 2023 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Between: Karengrrla Rajaiah, S/o.Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 2825480, RK€lncline, Singareni Colteries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. e.No. ND-3031, Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial, District. AND ...PETITIONER/RESpONDENT No.1 'l . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr.rdem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personiel Department, Singare, niBhavan Hyderabad, 4 I.t'" c91e1a] Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coilieries Company 5. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial Districi. P_adma ?o Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not: necessary) ...RESPONDENTS 69 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 756 of 2025, dated 17.O7.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeat. Gounsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.I: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent preffered Against the Order Dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No 20285 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srir:ampur, Mancherial District AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Liyakath Ali Khan, S/o Syamkhan, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Foreman, E.C.No. 2752700, Mine RK-lndine Srirampur Area, Singareni Colleries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. Ramakrishnapuram Adilabad District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 3OF 202s 70 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order datr:d 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20285 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 772OF:2O25 Writ Appreal under clause 't5 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order Dated. 30-08-2,124, in WP.No .2O787 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managinl; Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direr:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothaguclem, Khammam District.

3. The Gent:ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Wetfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Sriramapur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Sriramapur Area, Mancheriyal District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Ellavelli Satyanarayana, S/o Narayana, aged about 63 years Occ Ex Coal Cutter E 3 No 2765606 Mine RK 8 Srirampur Area Singareni Collieries Company Limited SCCL Ri/o Krishna Colony Srirampur Mandal Mancherial District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS 7l l.A. NO:3OF2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20787 of 2O23 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW wnr irFFEAffi NOi[f 63XiF,2o2s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19524 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The Genenal Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan H$erabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ANO ...APPELLANTS 'l . Kandula Venkatranarayana, S/o Gopaiah, aged General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 0440894, Mine Work Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/ o. Q. No Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. about 63 years, Occ. Ex- shop, Corporate, Singareni SD-l9, 24 Area, Yellandu, Rep by its Superintendent, ...RESPONDENTS 72 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order daterd 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19524 ot 2O23 in the interest of justice. Counsel for tlie Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL i SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the o/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 894 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-20:24 in W.P.No.19655 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Sinllareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managingr Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direc:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS 'I . Pudery Stranker, S/o. P Sammaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Drill Operator, 11. C.No. 4037936, Mine . GKOC, KGM Area, Singareni Collieries Company t-imited (SCCL) R/o. Kothagudem Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

2. The Medic; rl Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao \agar Secunderabad, Telangana. 73 I.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19655 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. counserrortheApperr"""'3[i=.:3AlfX*tiXttSiq'Ss."3-'S3Ei,-* SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKATRAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL o 25 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19718 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 't . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Gopi Nagabhushanam, S/o. Narsaiah, aged about 6b years, Occ. Ex-Haulage Operator, VK-7 lncline, KGM Area, SCCL R/o. e.No.S, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Sccunderabad, Telangana. 74 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dat€,d 30.O8.2024 passed in Writ. Petition No. 19718 of 2O23 in the interest of justice. Counsel for tire Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for tfre Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRITAPPEAL NO: 897 OF 202s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/20114 in W.P.No.2O673 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Sinllareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagud,:m, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departmerrt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (S(ICL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Manga Satyanarayana, S/o. M Odelu, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Pump Operator, E.C.No. 267709, Mine: PVK-S lncline, Ramagudam-l Area, Singareni Oolleries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. H.No 8-2-164, Writerbasthi, 22 yatd' Gollagudenr, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

2. The Medicirl Board of Gandhi lvledical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao ltlagar Secunderabad, Telangana. 75 ...RESPONDENTS !.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20673 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO Writ Appeal under clause '15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No.19863 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Wefare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Komaragiri Ananthaiah, S/o. K. Veerabhadraiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Trammer, VK-7 lncline, Kothagudem Area, SCCL, Ri/ o. H. No 5-1-97, NK Nagar, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem (Khammam)District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. 76 l.A. NO:3O ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,d 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19863 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for tlre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for ttre Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 926 OF 202s Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Lefters Patent prefered against the order dated 30/08/20114 in W.P.No.19875 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: I . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managingl Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direc'tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The Gene, ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Verukonda Satyanarayana, S/o. Edukondalu, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex - Conveyor Operator, E.C.No. 4047169, KGM Area, Singareni Colleries Co. LId(SCCL) Rl/o. Writer Basthi, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. 77 l.A. NO:3OF2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19875 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the o/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDIGAL HEALTH & FW WRr nppeAL No: 927 oF,ziiii Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19658 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Kampally Durgaiah, S/o. K Ramulu, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 0228284, Mine: Gothamkhani, Kothagudem Area, Singareni Colliries Company Limited (sccl) R/o. H.No. 16-2-218, Nagaiahgadda, Ramavaram, Garibpeta(Rural), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 78

2. The lvledical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmirrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 Of:2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19658 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW wRiT''AFFeAL'ttOl szs oF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20634 of 2023 on the fite of the High Cou( Between: 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direclor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudt:m, Khammam District.

3. The Genr:ral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Bhupalapally, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District. AND ...APPELLANTS

1. Dunde Rajaiah, S/o. Venkataiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2043915, Mine .KTK -1 and lA lncline, Bhupalpalli Area, SCCL R/o. H. No. 541 , Mellenium Quarters, Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District. 79

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmamo Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20634 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ' Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW Wnir'aFpeAl Noi gso OF2ozs Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of th€ Letters Patent prefened against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O026 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rpp by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Gorporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothgudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ANO ...APPELLANTS 1 Madipoju Sreenu, S/o. M. Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-pump Operator, VK-7 lnctine, KGM Area, SCCL, R/o.H.No. fi:223, Subhash Nagai, Yellandu, Khammam District. 80

2. The tVledical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

3. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition r.rnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,l 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20026 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN Gounsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW yyps:aiipfffiffi:'i ib3'Or zozs Writ Apperal under clause '15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order Dated 30-08-202i4 Passed in W.P.No.19654 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Direclor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagude'm, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and cSR, The Singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni []havan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhadradri Kothagudem, Adilabad District. ...APPELLANTS AND 8l

1. Adepu Rajesham, S/o.Poshamallu, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-General Mazdoor, CSP, Manuguru, Singareni Collieries Company Limited(SCCL), FUo Kondapur, Khammam District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 .RESFONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 1965,tof 2023 in the interest of justice. Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SC FORSCCL/ Counset for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER' Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKATRAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW NO: 1164 OF Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order Dated 't3108/2024 in W.P.No.2O275 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad. : 2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departrnent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni. Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District. AND 82

1. Basaboina Rayalingu, S/o.Basaboina lylaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Ex- Support Man, E.C.No. 900315, Mine GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RGl, Area, Ri/o. H. No.i'-1 -3/36, GM Colony, Godavarikhani Ramagundam Peddapalli District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padma rao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana t.A. 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the afficiavit fileci ir support of the petition, the High court may be pieased to suspend the order daterl 3008.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 2027s ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for thre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW TIITIr) Writ Appr:al under clause 15 of the Letters patent preferred Against Order Dated 30/08/202i4 in WP.No.19818 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep its Chairman and Managing Director, S;imeareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Cottieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudt:m, Khammam District.

3. The Genr>ral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SOCL), Ragundam Area, Peddapalli District. AND 83

1. Devasani Krishna, S/o.Devasani Posham, aged about 65 years Occ. Ex-Rope Splicer, G.D.K-S RG-|, Area, sccl, Rl/o. D,-2172 Tilak Nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District. 2 The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical HoSpital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19818 ot 2O23 in the interest of justice. Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counse! forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRff[FFEAt''tt6: ti6z oF zozs Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent Appeal prefened against the Orderdated 3010812024 in W.P.No.19780 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, peddapalli District. AND ...APPELLANTS 84

1. Marikilla Kanakaiah, S/o. Marikilla Lingaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Trammer, E.C.No. 941727, Mine . GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RG-|, R/o. H.No.2- 89, Chinnaboungur, Sulthanabad, Peddapalii District.

2. The M,edical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2O2s ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied iii support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to suspend the order datert 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19780 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for thr: Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEA.L NO: 1T6Eb"FEOZ5 Writ Apperal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.202.4 in Writ Petition No.19422 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Sing, areni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direc, tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited' Kothagude'm, Khammam

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries. Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personal Departmert, Singareni bhavan Hyderabad.

4. The Gene:ral Manager, Ramagundam area, The Singareni Collieries Company L.imited (SCCL), RamagundamJ, Peddapalli District AND ...APPELLANTS 85

1. Kekerla Veerasham, S/o. Kekerla Komurelli, aged about 63 years, Occ: Ex- General Mazdoor, E.C.No.912590, Mine: GDK-S lncline, RG-|, SCCL, R/o. H.No.8-3-580, Seeta Nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.19422 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW wRff AFPEIlIfri6ffii"60b F, zd2 s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.2@O3 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Direc{or, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad. 4 ].heGeneral Manager, Manuguru Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Manuguru, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS 86 1 . Syed lsaque, S/o. Syed Hussain, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-EP Operator, E.C.N,:. 4031257, PKOC-4, Manuguru Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/o, H. No. 533, P.V. Colony, Manguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep. by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. !.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dater1 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20003 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for thrr Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENI(AT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 1171 OF 2025 Writ Appe'al under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19911 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Sing, areni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagude m, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni tlhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS 87

1. Talari Ravi Kumar, S/o. Jayaprakash, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- EP Operator, E.C.No. 473172, Mine GKOC, KGM Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/o H. No.2-24, Bhadradri Kothagudem District 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO:3OF2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19911 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL H€ALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NOiirL:iz: OiEizo25 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.30912 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Perconnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, 4 The General Manager, Ramagundam-1, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS 88

1. Gosikar Laxmaiah, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Conveyor Operalor, EC.No.1454082, Mine. GDK 1 and 3 lncline, Ramagundam-l Area, SCCL, R/o H.No.10-1-16/3, Khammam, Khammam District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit fiied irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date<t 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 30912 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for thr: Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDIGAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: 1182OF 2025 Writ Appoal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened Against Order Dated24lO9l2O24 in WP.No.3564 ot 2024 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagude'm, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni []havan Hyderabad,

4. The Gene, ral Manager, Ramagundam-l Area, The Singareni Collieries Company t.imited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Ramagundam District AND ...APPELLANTS 89

1. Bathula Nagaraju, S/o. Narayana, E.C.No.1425334 aged about 63 years Ex EP Operator, Spl. Grade, Ramagundam-l Area, Mine, MOCP Singareni Collieries Company Limited SCCL Rl/o Q.No.SC2-53, Sharadanagar Godavarikhani, Ramagundam District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO:3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 24.09.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 3564 ot 2O24 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRIT APPEAL NO: {3iO*CiF 5 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Preferred against Order dated 3010812024 in WP.No.20316 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad, a lhe Genelal Manager, Yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Yellandu Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ANO ...APPELLANTS 90

1. Lamberdi Ramdas, S/o. Bhaw singh, aged about 65 years Occ Ex-Lineman Mine 2:1 lncline Yellandu Area SCCL R/o Q.No.SD19 Bhagyanagar Thanda Post Singareni Mandal Khammam District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20316 of 2023 in the interest ofjustice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the, Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW iffiiTiippeAL No: 1311oF zozs Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order Dated 30{8-2024 in W.P.No.2O229 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Direct, rr (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR' The Singareni Collieries rlompany Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SC:CL), Yellandu Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. AND ...APPELLANTS 9l

1. Gundala Chandram, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Sr. Mining Sirdar, E.C.No. 0504575, Mine 21 Incline, Yellandu Area, SCCL R/o. H. No.4- 1-14311 , Basti No. 15, Yellandu Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20229 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / .RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the SRI P SRI S O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW APPEAL NO: 1312 Writ Appeal under clause 'l 5 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.20054 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limlted, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

1. Payam Sooraiah, S/o.Ramaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex - Roof Bolting Stitche 21 lncline Yellandu Area SCCL Rr/o H.No. 20-49, Balaji Nagar, Yellanclu, Khammam District

2. The Mr;dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana .RESPONDENTS Petition under Section I 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order datecl 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20054 of 2O23 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for ther Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW EAL NO: 1413 OF Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.202.1 in Writ Petition No. 20256 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

1. The Singrrreni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company t-imited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-lll Area, District. Peddapalli AND 93

1. Hazam Ramdas, S/o. Hazam Bhadru aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, Ramagundam-3 Area, SCCL Fl/o. H.No.3-101, Bhagyanagar Thanda, Usirikayalapalle, Khammam District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20256 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. AODL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW Wnir appeAL No: 1414oF 2o2s Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against Order Dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19638 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad, 4 Lf," C9l9!"1 Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Ramagundam Area, karimnagar District AND ...APPELLANTS 94

1. Teejavati Hatiram, S/o Bikkiya, aged about 65 years, Occ Ex-Coal Cutter GDK10 lncline Ramagundam-3 Area, SCCL Rl/o H No 6-'t8 Mekata Thanda Ramar]undam mandal Khammam District

2. The Mredical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the amdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to suspend the order datel 3OlO8l2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19638 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.IUADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT R^AMAN Counset forthei Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WR|Th?FEnf, Ti6iiIrs oF 2025 Writ Appenl under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Prefened against the order dated 1W0812024 in WP No 1942O of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Sing; areni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni collieries company Limited (sccL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

3. The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and cSR, The Singareni collieries Company r-imited (SCCL) Welfare Wing' Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Elhavan Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Bellampalli Area The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Karimnagar District. ...APPELLANTS AND 95 1 . Mamidi Mallaiah, S/o Lingaiah, aged about 62 years, Occ Ex-General Mazdoor, Ramagundam-3 Area, Mine OCP-1 SCCL R/o H.No. 7-5-318, GM Colony GM-Geleny, GodavariKhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana l.A. NO:3OF2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petltion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19420 ot 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN Gounsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW WRlr AppeAL No: 1448 oF zozs Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30.08.2024 in Writ Petition No.20471 ot 2023, on the file of the High Court. Between

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad..

2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager Ramagundam Area-llt, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam - 3 Area, Peddapalli District. AND ...APPELLANTS 96

1. Madap,a Ella Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- Coal ()utter, E.C.No.1150387, Mine . GDK-10 lncline, SCCL, Rl/o. H.No. Q.No.!195, Block -29, Pothana Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

2. The M,gdical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad Telangana !.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date(l 30.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20471 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the, Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW wRrr APPEAU Il6iX ii6ii, UF,2ozs Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against Order Dated 30-08-2024 in WP.No.2O692 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

2. The Directrr (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The Gener, al Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company l-imited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Eihavan, Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam-lll Area The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District. AND ...APPELLANTS 97

1. Khatam Shankaraiah, S/o. Rayalingu, aged about 63 years, Occ: ExGeneral Mazdoor, E.C.No.1450452, Mine: CHP GDK OCP-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Fl/o. H.No.6-86/6, Pannur, Centenary Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad. .A. NO:3OF2025 STIONEI=NIS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20692 ol 2023 in the interest of justice. Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW EA 7:F Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened Against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.3O783 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and , Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam- lll Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Peddapalli District. EIIIj] 98

1. B.R.W'illiam Moses, S/o B.J.Roberts, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-EP Operator, EC.No.4053039, Mine. GDK-OCP-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limted (SCCL), R/o. H.No.204, Mallaram, P.V.Colony, Khammam District.

2. The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition lnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,l 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 30783 of 2023 in the interest of justice. Counsel for ttre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SR! S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL, ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW The Court de, livered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT IIT TIIE HIGII OOIIRT FOR THE STATE OF TEIANGAI'IA AT IITDERABAI) THE HON'BI.E TTIE CHIEF JT'STICE SRI APARESH I{IIMAR SINGTI THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE G.M,MOHIUDDIN I'^IlIrarrfrs[fa 37.3- 469 47o. 475- 476- 4 492- 495^ 6L 620. 621- 622- 4- IIos.39- 6- 2A2- 310- 311- 307 Fnr, 2- 444- 4aa 449- 49o. 491. 641 642- 646- 647 31 637 676 641

711.712- 713.7L4.715.7L6- 7t7. 72A. 736. 737. 73a.743. 75,6- 467- 772.7A3. a94. a95- 897. 898. 926.927. 928.93o 154. 1165. 1167. 1168. 11 69. tl7t. tt72.1182. 1163- 131()- 13 l. lsl2. 1413. 1414. 1415. 144a- 1504 and 15O6 m The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. .Appellants Madurakavi Kistaiah and another. TI, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. .Appellants Konda Ramulu and another. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Pendyala Rayamallu and another. ....Ap 2 W.A.IIo.3O7 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Janne pochaiah and another. W.A.No.3O9 of 2o25 Betweert: The Sing.arerri Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. .Appellants Mekala Flajeswar Rao and another. VI.A.No.SI1O of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Kolkipongg Chinni and another. Respondents SI.A.No.3L1 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Ap Gumasa Shankar and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.312 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

Immidichet ty Chandraiah and another. .Respondents w.A-No.31:3 0l 2o25 Between: The Singar<:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others' ....Appellants Yasam Shenkaraiah and another. 3 W.A.No.459 of 2O2S The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Kalavala Lachaiah and another. iTt .Appellants The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. .Appellants Doddilla Madanaiah and another. FII The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Dongala Mallaiah and another. iTt The Singareni Collieries Company G. Kanakaiah and another. W.A.No.479 ot2025 Respondents Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Respondents The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. .Appellants G. Sadashivam and another. w Respondents The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Mamidi Rajaiah and another. And .Appellants .Respondents 4 SI.A.No.488 of 2025 Between: The Sinl; areni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Ponnam Rayamallu and another.

And ....Respondents W.A.No.489 ol 2o25 Between: The Singareni Coilieries Company Limited and 3 others. Namasani Narsaiah and another. Ard ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.Ito.49O of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Paranand:. Ramaiah and another. And ....Respondents trI.A.No.4lll of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Atla Mallaiah and another. And ....Respondents \tr.A.No.492 of 2025 Between: The Singarr:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Gandu Posl-ramallu and another. And ....Respondents trI.A.No.49!i ol 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats And Vemulawad.l Laxman and another. ....Respondents 5 [r.A.IYo.614 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Sri Devasani Sailu and another. And W.A.No.52O of 2ol25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants And Kanthala Mohan Reddy and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.62L of 2o.25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

Byram Mallaiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.622 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Pittala Rajaiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.633 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Sadala Pentaiah and another. And w.A.No.63? of 2o2s Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. '. "'Respondents And Late Boina Kanakaiah and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents 6 W.A.No.64l of 2o25 Between: The Sin; gareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Mogili Rajamallu and another. And W.A.No.642 of 2o25 Betweerr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondeats Suramall.a Ratnaiah and another. And ....Appellants W.A.No.646 of 2o25 Betseen: The Sing.rreni Collieries Company Limited and another.. ....Respondents Thotla Jayanna and another.

And ....Appellants ....Respondents Itr.A.IIo.647 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats Nannavenir Saraiah and another. And W.A.No.648 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants Embadi Lirrgaiah and another. And ....Respoadeats w.A.No.65:3 0f 2025 Between: The Singart:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Chekka Lingaiah and another. And ....Respondents 7 W.A.No.664 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. And Maraboina Komuraiah and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.666 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Kummari Kistaiah and another. And ....Appellants W.A.No.672 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Rontala Gangaram and another. And ....Appellants W.A.No.675 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Ch.

Rajaiah and another. W.A.No.676 of 2o25 And ....Appellants ....Respondents Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Chintakindi Sheshagiri and another. IlI.A.No.681 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondeats Palle Rajaiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents 8 W.A.Ito,686 of 2o25 Betweeo: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Gotte Rzrjaiah and another. And ....Respondents 7 of2o25 ar,l Betseetr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Suramal.a Chinnaiah and another. ....Respondents If.A.I{o.7O6 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats Ankarn Sammaiah and another. And W.A.No.7O9 of 2o.25 Betweea: Ttre Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats ....Respondents Nagunuri Saraiah and another.

And ....Respondents W.A.!Io.71.1 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Gunti Iylaiah and another. And ....Respondelts W.A.No.712 of 2o25 Betweea: The Singan:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellarts Mutyam Dt:vaiah and another. And ....Respondents 9 W.A.No.713 of 2ol25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Saga Mallaiah and another. And W.A.No.714 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ..;.Respondents ....Appellants And Chippakurthi Mallaiah and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.715 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Bomma Guruvaiah and another. And IlI.A.No.716 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants Minumula Ramchander and another. And W.A.No.7l7 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Madineni Posham and another.

And w.A.No.z2g of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. "'Respondents ....Appellants Katla Rajaiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents l0 W.A.No,,736 of 2o25 Between: The Sinl; areni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Md.Vazeer and another. And W.A.No.'737 of 2o25 Betweetr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants Durgam Gangaram and another. And W.A.No.7'38 of 2o25 Betweenr The Sing:reni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Otla Jeeva Ratnam and another. And W.A.No.7,43 of 2o25 Betweea: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants ....Respondents ....Appellants Shaik Gulam Rasool and another. And trr.A.No.756 of 2o25 Between: ....Respondeats The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Karengula Rajaiah and another. And ....Respondents Itr.A.No.7S7 of2O25 Between: The Singarr:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Liyakath Ali Khan and another.

And ...,Respondents II W.A.No.772 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats And Ellavelli Sat5ranarayana and another. W.A.IIo.783 of 2o.25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants Kandula Venkatanarayana and another. And W.A.No.894 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Re3ponderts ....Appellants Pudery Shanker and another. And W.A.I{o.895 of 2o25 Betseen: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents And Gopi Nagabhushanam and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.IIo.897 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. And Manga Sagranarayana and another. ....Appellants \tr A.ilo.a9a of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respoadents And Komaragiri Ananthaiah and another. ....Appellants ....Respondents 12 trI.A.No.926 of 2o25 Between: The Sin.gareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

Verukonda Satyanarayana and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents rv.A.I{o.927 of 2O2S Betweerr: The Sing',areni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Kampallv Durgaiah and another. And W.A.Ito.928 of 2o25 Between: The Singrreni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents ....Appellants Dunde Re{aiah and another. And trI.A.No.93O of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Madipoju Sreenu and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.I{o.11.63 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Adepu Rajt:sham and another. And ....Respondents W.A.No.11 Bctwcen: The Singart:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others' E ....Appellants Basaboina .Rayalingu and another. And ....Respondents l3 W.A.trto.1165 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Devasani Krishna and another.

And ....Respondeats W.A.No.1167 of 2o25 Betweetr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Marikilla Kanakaiah and another. And ....Respondents W.A.!to.1168 of 2o25 Behreer: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Kekerl,a Veerasham and another. And ....Respondeats W.A.Ifo.1169 ol 2o25 Betseelr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Syed Isaque and another. And ....Respondeats W.A.!to.l171 ol 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Talari Ravi Kumar and another. And ....Respondeats W.A.No.1172 of 2O2S Betsee!: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Gosika Laxmaiah and another. And ....Appellants ...,Respondents l4 W.A.No,,1182 of 2o25 Betrree:o: The Sinl; areni Collieries Company Limited and 2 others. Bathula Nagaraju and anottrer. And ....Appellants W.A.No.131O of 2o25 Betweerr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Lambadi Ramdas and another.

And ....Appellants \[I.A.l(o.1311 of 2o25 Betqreen:: The Sing:treni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Gundala tlhandram and another. And ....Appellants W.A.No.1:312 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Respondents Payam Sooraiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.14.13 of 2025 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Hazam Rarndas and another. W.A.No.14L4 of 2o25 Between: ....Respondents The Singart:ni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants Teejavathi [{atiram and another. Ard ....Respondents l5 W.A.No.1415 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Mamidi Mallaiah and another. And ....Appellants ....Respondents W.A.No.1448 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Madapa Ella Reddy and another. Ard W.A.Ito.lSO4 ot2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

And Khatam Shankaraiah and another. ol2o25 trI.A.lIo.1 Bctweer: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants ....Respondents ....Appellaats ....Respondents ....Appellants B.R.William Moses and another. And ....Respondents COMMON JI'I'GiMENT Since the issues that arise in the above writ appeals are integrally one and the same, the writ appeals are being disposed of by this Commbn Judgment.

2. These Writ Appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed in W.p.No. t8922 of 2023 and, batch by the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge has directed reconsideration of the medical categorization of the writ petitioners under Clause 9.4.O of the National Coal Wage 16 Agreemr:nt-Vl (NCWA-VI), by referring the matter back to Gandhi Medical Hospital, Secunderabad.

3. Hr:ard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and Sri S.Rahul Reddy, learned llpecial Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned A.dditional Advocate General, appearing for the appellants; Sri L.Ravichander, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner in W.A.No.4O of 2025 and batch except in W.A.No.39 of 2025; Sri P.S.Rajasekhar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Ve.:kat Raman, learned counsel for the respondents/writ petitioners in W.A.No.39 of 2025 and perused the record. Factual matrix (in brief)

4. The respondents herein are workmen of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), a Government Company under the admini:;trative control of the Ministry of Coal, Government of India. During the course of thek long service in mining operations, both underground and surface, these workmen were declared medically unfit on account of various ailments and disabilities. consequent upon such medical invalidation, they sought the benefit of dependent employment under C1ause 9-4-O of NCWA-VI' t7

5. The NCWA-VI, a bipartite settlement binding under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Acl, 1947 (for short '1947 Act), provides under Clause 9.4.O for emplo5rment to one dependent of a worker who is permanently disabled in his place. The clause draws a distinction between: i) permanent disablement arising from injury or disease resulting in loss of emplo5rment; and ii) disablement arising out of "general physical debility," subject to the condition that the employee is up to 58 years of age.

The controversy centers around the categorization of the respondents under Clause 9.a.0(i) or Clause 9.4.0(ii). The respondents contend that their medical conditions constitute permanent disabilities falling under Clause 9.4.0(i), thereby entitling their dependents to employment irrespective of age or residual service. Ttre appellant-Company, on the other hand, categorized the majority of the employees under Clause 9.4.O(ii), treating their condifions as cases of "general physical debility. " Since most of them were above 58 years of age or had less than two years of residual service, they were offered monetary compensation in lieu of dependent emplo5rment. 18 Earlier .Round of Litieation

In W.P.No.44l7O of 2016 and batch, by order dated

30.O7.2019, this Court directed the appellant-Company to forward the meclical invalidation certificates to the competent Medical Board fcr re-assessment and categorization under Clause 9.4.O(i) or (ii).

Pursuant thereto, the Corporate Medical Board (CMB) of SCCL reassessed the cases and placed all the employees under Clause 9.4.0(ii). Notably, none of the employees was categorized under Cle.use 9.4.O(i).

Cha.llenging such uniform categorization, 127 employees approachr:d this Court in W.P.No.261L of 2O2O and batch. By order dated 07. 12.2021, the learned Single Judge directed reference of the cases to an independent Medical Board at Gandhi Medical Hospital, liecunderabad, observing that the fact that not even a single employee was placed under Clause (i) raised legitimate doubt. lO. The appellant-Company carried the matter in appeal in W.A.No.38tr of 2022. By judgment dated 13-09.2022, the Division : Bench affirmed the order directing independent medical assessment. 19

11.

[n compliance, Gandhi Medical Hospital constituted an independent Medical Board, comprising specialists from various disciplines. The Board examined the cases of 127 employees and submitted its proceedings dated o3.o7.2o23. wherein, out of L2T cases, only six employees were categonz.ed under Clause 9.4.O(i), while the remaining 121 were placed under Clause 9.4.O(ii).

12.

Aggrieved by such categoriz, ation, 103 employees filed fresh writ petitions, leading to the impugned common order dated 3O.O8.2O24. The learned Single Judge, upon examining certain individual cases, including that of a petitioner who had suffered amputation of the right leg above knee level and had been certified with 94%o disability, formed. the view that cases involving clear and "permanent disabilit5/ ought not to have been categorized as "general physical debility. " The matter was accordingly remitted once again to Gandhi Medical Hospital for re-visiting the categorization. Subsequent developments during pendencv of appeals

13.

Para 9.4.o of NCWA-vI, which is relevant for consideration, is extracted hereunder: '9.4.o Employment to one dependant of a worker who is perrnanently disabled in his place (i) The disablement of the worker concerned should arise from injury or disease, be of a permanent nature resurting into loss of employment and it should be so certified by the"coal Company concerned. 20 (i::) In case of disablement arising out of general physical d,:bility so certified by the Coal Company, the employee concerned will be eligible for the benefit under this clause if hc/she is up to the age of 58 years. The term 'general physical debility' would mean de ficiency of a workman due to any disease or other health re, rson leading to his/her disablement to perform his/her du.ties regularly and/or efliciently. (iiil The dependent for this purpose mearls the wife/ husbanci as the case may be unmarried daughter, son anci legally adopted son.

If no such direct dependent is available for employment, brother, widowed daughter/widowed daughter- in-taw or son-in-law residing with the employee and almost whclly dependent on the earning of the employee may be corrsidered- In so far as female dependants are concemed, their employment would be governed by the provisions of clause 9.5 0. (iv) The dependants to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for emplo5rment and aged more than 35 years provided that in the age limit in case of employment of female spouse is concemed, there would be no age limit regarding provision of employment. " During the pendency of the present writ appeals, this Court noticed thirt under clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI extracted hereinabove, the certili<:ation whether an employee falls under clause (i) or clause (ii) cf para 9.4.0 of NCWA-VI has to be made by the Coal Company concerned. However, instead of Coal Company undertaking the exercise on the basis of the assessment conducted by the independent Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, the Medical Bo,erd had categorized the employees under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) t,f Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. This was not in consonance with the settlement arrived at between the management and workmen uide NCWA-VI under Section t 8(3) of the Industrial 2l Disputes Act, 1947.

This Court, therefore, felt that the same is not in conformit5r with Para 9.4.0 of NCWA-VI for the reason that the task of categorization of an employee for dependent employment on grounds of injury or disease of a permanent nature under Clause (i) or for other benefits such as monetary benefits under Clause (ii) on account of disablement arising out of general physical debility, is to be undertaken by the employer, who is in the best position to undertake such an exercise, instead of an independent Medical Board comprising the experts, who are unconnected with the organization and unaware of the nature of duties and responsibilities to be performed by such employees in the Coal Company. This Court felt that the medical expert can only render an opinion on the disablement of the workmen by injury or disease, or due to general physical debility on the basis of evaluation of their medical condition.

They cannot be tasked to categorize any employee under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI, as that responsibiligr lies witJ: the employer or the organization. The underlying grievance of tl:e petitioners is based on their categorization by the Medical Board under Ctause (i) or Clause (ii) of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. The writ petitioners did not explicitly question the assessment or opinion given by the Medical Board as to their general physical debility or injury or disease. The question whether such disabilit5r is of pernzrnent nature, which would bring them under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of para 9.4.O in 22 NCwA-r/I is an exercise to be undertaken by the Coal Company as specifically mandated in the settlement between the management and the workmen. The circulars issued by the Management to undertal<e such exercise by the Corporate Medical Board had undergo:re change in the last ten years. The Court took note of the constitution of the Corporate iVledical Boar<i vide circular dated O7.O4.2O15 and the succeeding Office Memorandum dated

09.03.2O18 as those would be material for issuance of appropriate direction upon the Coal Company to undertake the task of categorizettion. Taking into note the constitution of the Corporate Medical Eloard in the aforesaid circulars, this Court directed the appellant company to constitute a Corporate Medical Board comprisin,g members of the Personnel Department i.e., an offrcer from Minirrg Discipline, not below the rank of General Manager, to be nominrrted by Director (P,A&W); an ofhcer from Personnel Departmer.t not below the rank of General Manager t6 be nominated by Director (P,A&w); one officer from MS Department i.e., General Manager, MS; the Chief Medical Officer and one or two spicialists to be nominated by the Director (P,A&W) in the same manner as in the Circular dated O7.O4.2O 15' The Coal Company had not expressed any objection to constitute a more broad based committee lbr carrying out this exercise' This Court directed that the cases ol'all the writ petitioners for categorisation under clause (i) or clause {ii} of para 9-4.0 be considered by the above committee 23 on the basis of the opinion rendered by the independent Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital vide its Report dated28.Ol.2023 within a stipulated period.

14.

In compliance, the Medical Board conducted detailed proceedings on 27.01.2026, 2a.OL.2O26 and 31.O1.2O26, and submitted its consolidated report under Memo dated. 04.02.2O26. The said Memo reflects individual assessment of each employee with reference to the nature of ailment, percentage of disability (where assessed), and the resultant incapacit5r.

15.

The material placed before this Court, particularly the proceedings culminating in the Memo dated 04.02.2O26, indicates that while a substantial number of cases pertain to generalized age-related debility and multi-system decline, certain employees suffer from grave, identiliable, and permanent disabilities, such as amputation, severe neurological deficits, loss of vision, advanced cardiomyopathy, chronic renal failure requiring dialysis, and seizure disorders with structural brain patholosl wlaicle, prima facie, appear to fall within the ambit of Clause 9.4.0(i).

16.

It is in this backdrop that the present appeals are required to be adjudicated, balancing the sanctity of expert medical opinion with the statutory obligation to correctly apply the distinction embedded in Clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI, particularly in cases where the seriousness and permanence of disability are evident on record. 24 Submissions on behalf of the Appellants (SCCLI

17.

k:arned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant- Company, advanced elaborate submissions assailing the impugned order dated 3O.O8.2O24 as under: i) That the appellant is strictly governed by the provisions of tht: NCWA-VI and the implementation guidelines issued by the, Joint Bipartite Committee for Coal Industry (JBCCI) and Coal India Limited. Being a signatory to the bipartite setliement under Section f 2(3) of the 1947 Act, the Company is tround to implement Clause 9.4.0 in its true letter and spirit and cannot travel beyond its express stipulations. ii) That under Clause 9.4.0(ii), the benefit of dependent emplo5rment is available only if the employee is 'upto the age of 58 years. " Admittedly, the respondents had crossed 58 years of age at the time of their medical examination. Thus, even assuming medical invalidation, they are ineligible for depe:rdent employment. iii) That employees with less than 24 months of residual service are rrot entitled to dependent employment but may be granted lump sum compensation of Rs-5,0O,000/- or wages for the balance period, whichever is less.

25 M That most of the respondents had less than two years of senrice remaining at the time of medical invalidation. The Company, on humanitarian considerations, extended monetary benefits, though not mandatorily required under NCWA. Having accepted terminal benefits, the respondents cannot now claim dependent emplo5rment as of right. v) That the cases of the respondents have undergone three rounds of medical scrutiny: a) By the CMB of SCCL (consisting of CMO and specialist doctors), which declared them unfit and pl, aced them under Clause (ii). bf Pursuant to this Court's order dated 3O.O7.2O 19 in W.P.No.44170 of 2016 and batch, the CMB re- examined and again placed them under Clause (ii). c) Pursuant to this Court's order dated O7.L2,2O2L in W.P.No.2611 of 2O2O and batch, the independent Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital (15 specialist doctors) examined and placed l2l otut of 127 under Clause (ii). ' vi) That the independent Board at Gandhi Medical Hospital comprised l5 specialists from various disciplines and categorized l2l out of l2Z employees under Clause 9.4.0(ii).

After three expert evaluations, the matter ought to attain Iinality. 26 vii) That Clause (i) applies only where disablement arises from a speciflc injury or disease of a permanent nature resulting in toial loss of emplo5rment. Clause (ii) applies to disablement ar:.sing out of "general physical debility. " viii) That though Madurakavi Kistaiah, had suffered amputation, thr: Medical Board opined that he could be considered for surface duties. Therefore, it was not a case of absolute um:mployability attracting Clause (i). ix) That compassionate or dependent employment is not a mal:ter of right. Prescription of age limits and eligibility criteria is within the policy domain and cannot be diluted merely because marginal hardship is caused. x) That: all respondents have since retired upon attaining supe rannuation and their terminal benefits have been settk:d. Grant of dependent employment at this stage would distu rb recruitment planning and prejudice eligible cand:idates in the oPen market. xi) That categorization under Clause 9'4'0(0 or (ii) is essentially a medical question.

The Court ought not to substitute its own opinion for that of an expert Medical Board, particularly one constituted pursuant to judicial direction' 27 xii) That repeated challenges to medical categorization would lead to unending litigation. The impugned order, directing yet another re-visit, is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside. Submlssioas on behalf of respondent ![o.1 (workmenf

18.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.l, supported the impugned order and advanced the submissions as under: i) That NCWA-VI is a welfare-oriented bipartite settlement intended to provide social security to coal mine workers engaged in hazardous employment. Its provisions must receive a liberal and purposive interpretation. ii) That the entire controversy stems from a fundamental conflation of the terms "debility" and "disabilit5r." Drawing upon accepted medical understanding, he submitted that the two expressions are conceptually and clinically distinct. According to him: a) Debility denotes a generalized state of weakness or decline in physical or mental health, often age-related, gradual, and in certain cases manageable or reversible. It reflects a condition of diminished strength rather than a specific structural or functional impairment. 28 b) Disability, on the other hand, signifies a specific and identifiable impairment resulting from injury or disease, which substantially restricts an individual's ability to perform major life or occupational activities.

Such disability is ordinaril.y permanent in character and traceable to a defined pathoiogicai cause. It vras thus urged that permanent, disease-specific or injury- specific impairments cannot be subsumed under the generic expression "general physical debility. " iii) That the cases involving amputation, stroke with neurological deficit, seizure disorders, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure, loss of vision, and orthopaedic incapacities are instances of permanent disability arising from disease/injury and squarely fall under Clause 9.4.0(i). iv) That Clause (i) does not prescribe any age restriction. Once a case falls within Clause (i), the age of the employee or leftover seryi,:e becomes wholly irrelevant. v) With specific reference to the petitioner who suffered amptttation of the right leg above knee [eve[ and was certified with 94o/o perna.nent disability, it was argued that categtrizing such a case under "general physical debility" defies logic and medical science; that if such a case does not 29 fall under Clause (i), the very object of the provision stands defeated. vi) That initially aJl 127 cases were placed under Clause (ii) by the Corporate Medical Board, and even the independent Board categofized l2L under Clause (ii).

Given the varied nature of ailments, such uniformity raises legitimate doubt as to individualizrd assessment. vii) By referring to information obtained under the Right to Information Act, it was contended that: i) Clear parameters distinguishing Clause (i) and (ii) were not disclosed; ii) Certain members of the Board had previously been associated with SCCL as panel doctors; ul) The responses were evasive. viiil That the impugned direction for re-visit is justified in order to ensure a fair and reasoned medical assessment. ix) That despite repeated judicial directions (orders dated 3O.O7.2O19, 07.12.2021 and subsequent proceedings), the appellant has consistently resisted granting dependent emplo5rment, necessitating continued litigation. x) That arbitrar5r categorization violates Articles 14, 16 ar.d 2L of the Constitution of India. Denial of dependent employment 30 irr cases of grave and permanent disability defeats the social st:curity intent under\ring NCWA-VI. L9.

We have taken note of the respective submissions urged and the material placed on record, including the proceedings of the Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital dated O3.O7.2O23, as well as the earlier report dated 28.01.2023 referred to in the orders passed in W.A.No.39 of 2025. The report records that L27 employer:s were examined and categorised under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of Paragraph 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. Consideration by this Court

20.

In lhe present case, a careful reading of the report discloses that out of 127 cases, as many as 121 employees were placed under Clause (ii) "disablement arising out of general physical debility" and only 6 were placed under Clause (i) "permanent disableme nt arising from injury or disease". The statistical outcome itself calls for close scrutiny, particularly when the diagnoses recorded include amputation, stroke with hemiparesis, cervical fusion with quadriparesis, glaucoma with optic atrophy, seizure disorders, and other grave conditions. 2L. The definition of "general physical debility" in the settlement contempla':es a deficiency of a workma.n due to any disease or other health reason leading to his/her disablement to perform duties reg"rlarly and/or efficiently. The expression "general" is 3l significant. It denotes a broad-based state of weakness or infirmit5r, not a specific, measurable, permanent impairment arising from an identifiable patholory.

22.

It is to be noted that Clause (i), in contrast, expressly refers to disablement 'arising from injury or disease" and 'being of a perrnanent natrrre. " The textual distinction between the two clauses is deliberate. Botl speak of "disablement," but the cause and character of such disablement are distinct. Clause (i) addresses specific, permanent disabilities traceable to a defined. injury or disease; Clause (ii) addresses disablement flowing from generalized debility.

23.

In medical jurisprudence, "debility" signifies generalized weakness i.e., asthenia, age-related decline, or systemic diminution of strength which may be managed or ameliorated. "Disability," on the other hand, refers to a defined impairment i.e., orthopaedic, neurological, cardiac, oncological, or ophthalmic, which is measurable, certifiable, and often irreversible.

24.

The material extracted from the hospital proceedings demonstrates that some of the employees were suffering from conditions such as: a) Post-traumatic amputation with 94o/o certified disability; b) Stroke (CVA) with hemiparesis and seizure disorder; c) Cervical fusion with quadriparesis; 32 d) Glaucomatous optic atrophy causing irreversible visual impairment. Thes;e are not instances of generalized weakness. They are specific, identifiable, permanent disabilities arising from injury or disease. To classify such cases under "general physical debitit5/ is to dilute the textual distinction consciously embedded in Clause (i) and Clau.se (ii).

25.

A r;crutiny of the medical opinion rendered by the Gandhi Medical lloard and the opinion of the Committee in the following cases refr:rred to in the Table indicate a complete non-application of mind to the nature of injury or disease which has resulted in disablemr:nt of permanent nature. If workmen suffer from such nature of injury or disease are still categorised under clause 9.4.O (ii), it wouLld amount to perversity and blurring off any distinction between t.:re criteria defined in 9.4.O (i) and (ii) to effectively deny the benefils of the social welfare scheme conceived under 9.4.O of s. No. I NCWA-VI. Name, of Employee Diagnosis (as recordedf Maduraka'ri Kistaiah Compound fracture with compartment syndrome; post-traumatic amputation (94o/o disability) Findtngs of the Corporate Uedical Board This was a case of compound fracture both bones upper one leg. Compound fracture means extensive soft tissue damage with bone and its fragments exposed.

Patient might develor: comoartment Opinion After taking into consideration of the independent Medical Board report 28.01.2023 of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Committee is of the opinion that 33 sJmdrome right leg. Compartment Syndrome is a condition that develops due to complication of fracture in which there will be excessive pressure build up in muscles resulting in neuro-vascular bundle damage which may cause damage to muscles and bones. Ttris requirement fasciotomy which is an emergency surgery relieve pressure in the muscle compartments by incisingfascia. Despite doing fasciotomy, there may be a condition vascularity cannot be restored and necrosis may develop. ln such case the loss may be permanent in nature. However, this disability can corrected with the help of prosthesis and patient can be made ambulatory. Hence there was no loss of emplo5rment. . He was operated with LS-LS pedicle screw and rod fixation, Bilateral L4, Rt.

L5 facetectomy with L3-L4 Lamincectomyand posterior decompression. This condition was already treated. o Gr.IV Osteo Arthritis Knee Lt. Gr.lI Rt. With Bilateral Patello femoral Arthritis, Cervical S5pondylosis - this is an age related degenerative condition can be treated by t]:e disease of the ex-employee was treatable permanent in nature which did not result in employment- Hence case is categorized under Clause e.4.o(iil. After taking into consideration of the independent Medical Board report 28.OL.2023 of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Committee is of the opinion that the disease of the ex-employee treatable permanent in nature which did not result in employment- Hence the case 8 Kekerla Veerasham l3-lA 14 months old post OP I3.L4.- L5 pedicle screw and rod fixation, BIL TA Rt. L5 facetectomy lamincectomy and posterior decompression (23.11.2OL71 Gr.IV OA l(nee Left Gr.II Rrght with B/L PFA Cervical Spondylosis. t6 Durganr Gangaram Old CVA with hemiparesis; post-stroke seizures 24 Chenda I'larayana Both glaucomatous optic atrophy 34 surgery. . There might be mild functional limitation due to spine surgery and Osteo Arthritis Knee but it does not result in loss of emnlovment. . He was suffering with Cerebrovascular Accident which is a condition caused by decreased blood flow to brain treatable with Medical Management and Physiotherapy. . He was also suffering from disc bulge at C3- C4 and C6-C7 thecal compression which can be treated by Medical Management and Physiotherapy, o As the diseases are treatable and does not result in loss of employment. . He was suffering from defective vision both eyes due to glaucomatous optic atrophy. a Glaucoma is condition irreversible, progressive optic nerve damage which is = a multi factorial disease i.e. genetic, age related, h5pertension Diabetes Mellitus, Heart disease, Smoking etc.

In the initial stage of Glaucoma, peripheral vision is usually alfected sparing the central vision. Even in categorized under Clause e.4.o(iil. After taking into consideration of the independent Medicai Boarci report dated 28.01.2023 of Gandhi Medical Hospital, the Committee is of the opinion that the disablement ex- employee was treatable and not permanent in nature which did not result in emplo5rment. Hence the case categorized under Clause e.4.o(iif . After taking into consideration of the independent Medical Board report dated 28.OL.2O23 of Gandhi Medical Hospital, the Committee is of the ctpinion that the disease of the ex-employee was manageable permanent in nature which did not result in employment. Hence the case categorized under Clause 32 Vasala Mogili C5-C6 cervical fusion with recovering quadriparesis 35 advanced stage the central vision remains intact and it usually takes an average of 10- 15 years before causing severe vision loss of blindness if left untreated.

The disability of tl,e above disease permanent nature but the progression can be slowed or halted with early diagnosis and treatment. r He was operated with C5-C6 Cervical tusion (2018) with recovering quadriparesis (right upper limb and lower limb weakness-power- 4/sl. o Patient was already operated with C5-C6 Cervical fusion. o There may be mild functional limitation due to quadriparesis (recovering) but it does not result in loss of emplo5rment. After taking into consideration of the independent Medical Board report dated 28-OI.2O23 of Gandhi Medical Hospital, the Committee is of the opinion that the disease of the ex-employee was treatable permanent in nature which did not result in employment. Hence the case categorized under Clause 9.4.O(iil.

26.

The above illustrations indicate a pattern wherein speciftc and permanent disabilities have been subsumed under the omnibus category of *general physical debility. "

27.

We also note that six cases were placed under Clause (i). The existence of these sk cases demonstrates that the Board was aware of the distinction. However, the criteria applied for inclusion 36 in Clause (i), as opposed to Clause (ii), are not disclosed in the report. '[he absence of reasoning renders judicial review difficult.

28.

It is a well-settled principle of law that this Court, in the exercise of its power of judicial review, does not sit as a Court of appeal over expert opinions, particularly in technical or medical matters. The wisdom and expertise of a duly constituted medical board are ordinarily entitled to great deference. However, this principle of judicial restraint is not absolute. It admits of exceptions where the decision-making process is found to be fundamentally flawed, unreasoned, or palpably arbitrar5r. Judicial review becomes not only permissible but imperative when the outcome of an expert process is so starkly at odds with the evident facts on record that it shocks the judicial conscience.

29.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Veer Pal Singh a. Ministry of Defencer has held as under:

10.

Although. the courts are extremelv loath to interfere with the spinlgn of the experts. there is nothine like exclusion of iudicial review of the decision taken on the basis of such opinion. What needs to be emphasised is that the opinion of the e:qlerts deserves gespgt and not worship and the courts and other iudicial/ouasi- judicial forums entrusted with the task of deciding the disputes relating to premature release/discharge from the Errmy czrnnot, in each and every case, refluse to examine the record of the Medical Board for determining whether or not the conclusion reached by it is legally sustainable. (emphasis supplied) tlzots; 8 SC,l 83 37

30.

In the present case the record of proceedings reveals repeated directions by this Court requiring objective reassessment by independent medical boards. Notwithstanding such directions, the near-uniform categorisation under Clause (ii) has persisted across assessments, despite the presence of catastrophic and demonstrably perrnanent disabilities. When a pattern of mechanical classification is evident, and when the gulf between the medical reality of a workman's condition and the label assigned to it is so wide, the Court cannot abdicate its Constitutional duty to uphold the rule of law and ensure that benefrcial welfare provisions are not rendered illusory by unreasoned executive action. To hold otherwise would be to permit a patently erroneous classification to gain immunity merely by virtue of being stamped by an txpert' body.

31.

The record of proceedings reveals repeated directions by this Court requiring objective reassessment by independent medical boards.

32.

Particularly, when this Court directed that tJ:e Committee act strictly on the basis of the report of Gandhi Medical Hospital dated

28.01.2023, the subsequent consideration appears to have drawn upon additional materials, contrary to the specilic mandate, necessitating a direction for further assessment by the committee. 38 The fine[ report of the Committee was submitted on O4.02.2026 is under judicial scrutiny.

33.

Ttre appellant-company has consistently invoked the age bar of 58 years and the condition of leftover service of less than two years. These factors are relevant only if the employee legitimately falls under Clause (ii). If the case falls under Clause (i), neither age nor lefto'rer service operates as a disqualification- The sequencing adopted by the appellant by first categorising under Clause (ii), then invoking age/serwice bars, effectively defeats the scheme.

34.

Further, Clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI is part of a bipartite settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act. Such settlements possess statutory force and must be implemented in their true spirit.

35.

It ir; setfled law that welfare measures must receive a beneficial construction. Social security provisions are intended to protect workmen who have suffered permanent incapacity during serwice. Any interpretative ambiguity must lean in favour of the benefiiiary. Compassionate or dependent employment schemes, though not fundamental rights, confer enforceable entitlements when conCitions are satisfied. Fairness and objectivity in classificatic,n are indispensable.

36.

Befor,: delving further into the merits, we must also take judicial nob.ce of the human element that forms the silent bedrock 39 of this litigation. These appeals are not merely about the interpretation of a senrice clause; they are about the lives of men who spent their years in the dark and dusty depths of coal mines, a profession fraught with peril and known to consume the health of those who toil in it. The respondents are workrnen who have given their prime to the nation's ener5/ security, often at the cost of their own physical well-being. They now suffer from ailments that have, in many cases, robbed them of their mobili$r, their vision, or their fundamental bodily integrity. One workman, Mr. Madurakavi Kistaiah, has endured a traumatic amputation. Others live with the aftermath of paralytic strokes, advanced malignancies, or severe cardiac events.

37.

At this juncture, the petitioners' quest for justice for their dependents has been an odyssey spanning nearly a decade, marked by multiple rounds of litigation and medical examinations, only to be met with consistent resistance and a seemingly pre- determined outcome. The mental anguish of fighting a prolonged legal battle, coupled with the physical pain of their disabilities, constitutes a form of suffering that cannot be quantified in monetar5r terms. [t is this profound human tragedy that lends a sense of urgency and gravity to our consideration. The repeated failure to correctly categorize their conditions has prolonged their agony and frustrated the very purpose of the social securit5r net 40 that the NCWA was intended to provide. The time for such protracted suffering to end is now.

38.

TtLis Court in Thummala Chandro; iah v. The Singareni Collieries Compang Limited2 has held as under: A:r employer can expect better output from his employees only if ht: looks after their welfare. One stand out feature of public er:rplo5rment is safety of tenure and assured post retirement benefits. Normally, once a person secures public employment, he becomes the sole breadwinner of the family and all other family mr:mbers depend on his earnings as a public servant. In an un.foreseen event when breadwinner meets premature death or be,:omes seriously ill, the financial arr€rngement of the family goes hafwire. As a responsible, concerned employer, it is his bounden duty to come to the rescue of such employee and/or his family members. Out of the concern/compassion to family of the employee, the concept of dependent emplo5rment has emerged. Thr: employer formulates scheme of dependent employment. The pri:nar5r objective of such scheme is to elevate (S/C alleviate) the suffering of family due to sudden death of employee or due to sicl<ness, becoming unemployable. Under the scheme of dependent emplo5rment, employer extends helping hand to the family of deceased employee/employee suffering with serious, life thrt:atening ailment, by providing employment to one of the family mernbers.

39.

It is to be noted that a significant factor contributing to the recurring riisputes in this matter appears to be the composition and functicning of the initial assessment bodies. The process of determinin,g an employee's categorization under Clause 9.+.O, while rooted in a medical diagnosis, has undeniable implications for his or her service and terminal benefits. It is a decision that sits at the intersection of medical expertise and administrative consequence. rw.P.No.424l7 of 2018 and batch dated. tg.o5.2o2o 4t

40.

It is apposite to note that the original scheme of the company, in its operation, failed to ensure a holistic and transparent assessment. While the medical board is rightly tasked with diagnosing the ailment, the final act of categorizing that ailment under Clause (i) or (ii) involves not just a clinical Iinding, but a legal and administrative determination that directly impacts l the rights of the workmen and their families. To ensure fairness, objectivity, and a comprehensive understanding of the workman's overall condition and its impact on his employabilit5r, the assessment team must be multi-disciplinary in the truest sense. 4L. In this regard, it is essential that in all future assessments, the committee responsible for final categorization includ.es, in addition to the core medical specialists, a representative from the Human Resources or Personnel Department, who can appreciate the service implications, and an officer from the operational side (such as mining), who can assess the physical demands of the job roles. Such a composition would not dilute the medical opinion but would enrich the context in which that opinion is applied, leading r to a more robust, fair, and just outcome. This procedural safeguard is vital to prevent the mechanical and uniform application of Clause (ii) to a diverse range of medical conditions, a flaw that has been at the heart of this prolonged litigation. 42

42.

It is to be noted that the categorisation under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) is, at its core, a medical determination. This Court lacks the exp<:rtise to substitute its opinion for that of specialists in orthopaedics, neurolory, cardiolory, oncologr, ophthalmolory, and allied fields.

43.

However, where the finciings oi the Committee is bereit oi reasoninl3 and explanatory analysis and appears inconsistent with the statr-rtory definition, the Court cannot remain a silent spectator. The report in question in the above instances show complete non-application of mind to the injury or disease with which thr: workman has been inflicted and which rendered him permanently disabled for being categorwed under clause 9.a.O(i). In matters involving life-altering disabilities, such mechanical classificat.on is unsatisfactory. Conclusion

44.

Upon an anxious consideration of the entire record, including l.he proceedings of the Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital d:tted 28.OL.2023 and 03.07.2023, the orders passed from time to time in W.A. No.39 of 2025 and connected matters, and the material extracted from the reports forming part of the record, we are of the ,:onsidered opinion that the near-uniform classification of 1,21 out of 127 cases under Clause (ii), despite the presence of serious ancl demonstrably permanent disabilities, gives rise to a prima facie infirmity in the application of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. 43 The distinction between permarlent disablement arising from injury or disease under Clause (i) and general physical debility under Clause (ii) is substantive and cannot be blurred without defeating the object of the settlement.

45.

The appeltant's reliance on qge and. resid.ual service conditions, predicated upon a Clause (ii) classification, cannot be sustained where the foundational categorisation itself appeurrs legally doubtful. While this Court does not substitute its opinion for that of medical experts, it cannot permit a mechanical or unreasoned exercise that undermines a benefrcial welfare provision and in that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the cases of workmen at serial Nos.l, 8, 16, 24 and.32 listed in the tabte at paragraph No.25 hereinabove are to be categorized as fatling in Clause (i) of 9.4-O of NCWA-VI.

46.

The categorisation of remaining workmen under Clause 9.4.O (ii) by the Committee does not suffer from unreasonableness or perversit5r calling for interference in judicial review by this Court. \ \

47.

tsefore parting, we must express our deep anguish at the c state of affairs revealed by these proceedings. Coal miners work under hazardous conditions, often sacrificing their heatth and longevity. The NCWA, negotiated between mErnagement and trade t unions, represents a hard-won social security measure for these workmen and their families. When a public sector undertaking 44 resists irnplementing such a measure through repeated litigation and non-compliance, it betrays the trust reposed in it by both the workmen and the communit5l.

48.

We close these matters with a sense of anguish,.hoping that the emplcyer/coal company henceforth renders a correct and just opinion based on the report of medical experts and the clear language r>f the NCWA and relevant considerations.

49.

considering the advanced age and precautious health of the .', workmen, who have endured a prolonged and arduous quest for justice, it is imperative that this litigation be brought to a quietus to ensure er definitive resolution.

50.

With the above observatidns and by placing the workmen listed at para 25 hereinabove in clause 9.4.0.(0 of NCWA, the writ Appeals art: disposed of- Monetary compensation paid, if any, to those workmen tisted at para 25 shalt be ad.justed or recovered from the arlmissible post retirement dues, if any, in accordance with law. Nc order as to costs. Conse:quently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed- To, //TRUE COPYII SD/. A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUW REGISTRAR ,6 SECTb( OFFICER

1. The Chairmern and tManaging Director. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan. Rect Hiils, Hyderabad. 2- The Director (PA & W). The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem Khamnrarrr Drstrict - - ( ('r',{d - -

3. The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR' The Singareni - Collieries Company limiteO (SCCLi Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

4. The General Manager, Ramagundam-lll Area, The Singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Karimnagar District'

5. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Peddapalli District'

6. TheGeneralManager, Bhupalapally, TheSingareniCollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District'

7. The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally, Mancherial District'

8. The General Manager, Bellampalli Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bellampalli Area, Mancherial Dastrict' g. The General Manager, Bellampalli Area The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Karimnagar District' lo. TheGeneral Manager, Manuguru Area, The singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Manr.rguru, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' t 1 . Ttre General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL)' Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District'

12. The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, ,Mancherial District'

13. The General Manager, The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District' 1 4. The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-l. The Singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Karimnagar District'

15. The General Manager. SRP, The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District. 16 I.h"..G:91 Malager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coltieries Company 1 7. The Generar Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni coflien]es company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial Districi. Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Aditabad Distri;t

18. The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The singareni coilieries company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ,/ / Limited (sccl), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 1 9. I.hg. Cgryg l\ranager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company 20. Ihe. General Manager, yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri iothaguoem District. J.ne..C91-egl Limited (SCCL) Ramagundam Area, karimnagir. Oi.trl"t {Vtanager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Z t . 22 The Superintendent, Medical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana. 23 One CC to SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN. Advocate tOpUCl 24 One CC ro SRr p.SRt HARSHA REDDY. SC FOR SCCL IOPUCI - c . -. ",_{.,1

25. Two CCs to ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State of Telanganrr at Hyderabad [OUTJ

26. Two CCs to GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

27. Two CD Copies BSR Prt4. r0r HIGH COITJRT DATED: 02/0312026 COMMON JUDGMENT ,W.A.NOs: 39. 40. 282.307 . 309. 31 0. 31 I . 31 2. 313. 469, 470.475, 476. 479 484.488. 499.490. 491. 492. 7 621 1 \, \ \ 622 63 672 67 637 641 W4 676 681 716 717 71 713 714 715 757 772 783 894 1 163 1 164 { 16s 1 1182 1 310 131 I 1504 & 1506 ot 2025 11 12 E 737 71 4 141 o U 3 t t|Afr 2026 ,€ * P4 * . . .DISPOSINGi OF ALL THE WRIT APPEALS , WITHOUT C:OSTS 24 B\){

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Telangana High Court, on 02 Mar 2026. The bench was SRIAPARESH KUMAR SINGH, G M MOHIUDOIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 20626 of 2023). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Which court decided this case, and when?

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Continue researching