Nemalidine Keerthi v. Rep.by its Registrar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Between: Nemalidine Keerthi D/o.Late N.Raja Sekhar Reddy, W/oLate N.Raja Sekhar Reddy (43) Sri Venkataranarayana Colony Kurnool District ..... PETITIONER
AND 1 Dr.N.T.R University of Health Sciences A.P Vijayawada Krishna District Rep.by its Registrar 2 The Convenor EAMCET-2008 (Agriculture & Medicine) Dr N.T.R University of Health Sciencess A.P Vijayawada Krishna District 3 Flt Lt ADPO29B office of the Air Head Quarters Vayu Bhavan New Delhi 110011 4 The Zilla Sainik Welfare Officer Kurnool District .....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1and 2 to consider the application of the petitioner to attend counseling of EAMCET-2008 on the strength of the Certificate of Children of Army personnel issued by the 4th respondent to be conducted on 30-7-2008 under Children of Army personnel quota and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 16517 OF 2008
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
30.04.2009 Stp ____________ (G. ROHINI, J.) // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR}
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.