M/s Anok Precision Tools Pvt. Ltd., 6-10, Road No.7, IDA, Uppal, Hyderabad v. Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, Uppal Industrial Area Local Authority
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 20 Jul 2004
- Bench
- B PRAKASH RAO
Outcome
Dismissed
Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 s. 228(3)
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records relating to the Provisional Order made by the respondent under Section 228(3) of A.P. Municipalities Act 1965 (Act 6 of 1965) bearing No.UC/IDA/UPPAL/C-8/2-A&B/4-2/966204 dated 15-10-1999 and quash the same by issuance of a Writ of Direction or Order particularly one in the nature of Certiorari holding that the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned order declaring as illegal and consequently direct the respondent not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the Plot Nos.C-8/2 A & B situated at IDA Uppal, Uppal Kialan Mnicipality, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.V.SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. P. Rambhoopal Reddy The Court Made the Following
ORDER:
Operative part
Sri R.V. Subba Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 15-7-2004 seeking permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _____________________ B. Prakash Rao, J. 20th July, 2004 js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
The Deputy Zonal Manager & Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, Uppal Industrial Area Local Authority, Industrial Estate, Moula Ali, Hyderabad.
2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 — s. 228(3).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Jul 2004. The bench was B PRAKASH RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.