Siddamoni Poojilha v. The State of_Telangana

6. Smt. lvluddam Balamani, W/o Narasimha, a jed about 45 years, occ Housewife

7. Smt. B.Anitha, W/o Venkataiah, aged about 30 years, Occ Housewife 8. Venkataiah, S/o not known to the petitioner aged 35 years, Occ ; Business Nos. 4 to B are r/o Madgula village and l\/andal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petrtion Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent No.2 in giving necessary orders to the 3rd respondent herein pursuant to the complaint dt. 11-8-2025, for taking action against the unofficial respondents basing on the 7 complaint dt. 16-7-2025 which was closed, without ass;rring un, ,.urron,: ,, being illegal, arbitranl, unjust and u ncon Stitutiona l. and r rnsequen y direct the 2nd respondent to issue necessary orders pursuant to t E compraint dt. 1r-B- 2025. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 . Petition Under liection 151 cpc praying that in the ( roumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court n.ay be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent No.3 herein to forthwith rtr;ister the FIR against the unofficial responrlents pursuant to the complaint d. 16-7-2025, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KASTHURI SURENDER Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to g : _ The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24617 of 2025 ORDER I {earc1 learrrc.d counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistarlt Covcrnment Pleac-ler for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the aclrnission stage itsclf

2. 'fhis w.rit pctition is filed aggrievecl by the action of the responrlent No.2/Cornmissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate in not giving necessary orders to the 3.t responclent l.rereitr pursuant to the complaint datcd 11.08.2025, for taking action against tire un-official responcftrnts basing on the complaint dated 76.07 .2025 which was closed, withou t assigrring any reasol-ls as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional anc'l seeking a consequential direction to 2.d respondent to issue necessary orders pursuant to the complaint dated 11.08.2025

3. 'l'he facts itr brief are that the petitioners marriage was perforrnecl witlr respondent No.4 on 27.04.2024 as per Hindu rites and custorns antl ;rt the tirne of marriage her parents gave 25 tulas of gold, B lakhs cash and certain other amounts for the purpose of marriage. The petitioner joined her husbanct, later the petitioner's relatives started harassing the petitioner for additional dorvry and lvas rlriven out of the matrir-nonial honrc !- \--=I \ l Tl.rereafter, the petitioner lodgecl a complaint bcfot. ;, , respondcnt. The un-official responclcnts rrave sent mediation for set .rnent of the issue wherein the ur-r-official respondents have agrced to I rv Rs.36,0 0,000/ _ to the petitioner- tolr'artls permanent arimony arrcr to that effect an undertaking-cu*-dt:cla ration datcd 16.04.2025 was r ,r,cuted a.d paid a sunr of Rs.1,00,000/-. lt is further subrnitted that exr ,l,t Rs.1,00,000/_ no further amounts arc p-r2 i6l and all tlte un_official res.,)lldents conspired together and hatcheil a plan ancl failecl to kecp uL) thLrir promise. Thcreafter, petiti.r.e.rade comprlai.t o, 16.07.2025 t he 3-r responclent against un-official rr.spondents for their cleceitful acts rrd breach of h.ust and tl're said corrplaint rvas receivetl b1, the 3,,r respo .Llent ort 23.07.2025 and petitioner rcccivcrl a lnessagc to lrer mobile p r(,]1e on 37.07.2025 stating that her complaint reccived ancl closed. It is frr ,lrer submitted that 3,d respondent rvitltout conducting ally sort of cn. irr11, and without affording her reasonable opportunitl.of being hearcl, rrilaterally closed her cornplaint anil aggrieved by thc closure of the cr nplaint, petitioner has given another coutplaint on j1.0g.2025 before 2nd r '; prondent bringing all the factual rnatrix a.cl requested to give necessal orders to the 3d responclent to tak. acti.l-r against tr-rc un-officiar resp( r({ents. Basing on the cornplaint datt'd 16.07.2025, no action was receiver Questioning the same, the present rvr.it petition is filed. J

4. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader appearing for Home has placed the written instructions submittecl by Sub-Inspector of Police, Madgul Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate wherein it is submitted tl'rat petitioner lodged a complaint dated 1.6.07.2025 with respondent No.3 against the respondent Nos.4 to 8 and he made G.D.entry and enquiry has been conducted. During the course of enquiry, it revealed that a case vide F.I.R.No.248 of 2025 dated 07.07.2025 was registered for the offences under Section 498-A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on same set of facts on the file of Women Police Staiion, Saroornagar, Rachakonda Commissionerate, as such the petitioner case l-ras been closed with an advise to approach Women Police Station, Saroornagar for counselling. It is further submitted I that 3.d respondent has conducted enquiry into the above petition and closed the petitioner as a case in F.I.R.No.248 of 2025 was lodged before Women Police Station, Saroornagar with same set of facts and the same is pending for counselling.

5. In that view of the matter, since the respondent authorities have already registered a case vide F.l.R.No.248 of 2025 for the offences under Section 498-.4 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act, the petitioner may pursue the remedy for the implementation of the undertaking-cum- declaration dated 16.011.2025 as the un-official respondents have already settlecl in part. [t is also made clear since the responclent authorities have I already registerr:d vide F.l.R.No.24g of 2025 ctated follow due proc,edure as contemplated under law. action. tl .07 2025, they shall ,' r' further course of 6 With these observations, this rvrit petition is clil .,,rse<.1 of Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sh stand closed. No order as to costs //TRUE COPY// S D/. C. DEEPIKA T REGIST a9S s .\' SECTION OFFICER lifiiJ$:'f* tecretary' Home Department, secretariai litate of reransana Ilfi 3lr;,:l"..nerof The S^tation House Officer, VqgSrf Iffi":"";::,frip* Horrae. niir, cJ,in #in5's'tllJl r"r"ns,n" One CC to SRt XASfUuRt SURENDER, Advocate [OF .rr]l Two CD Copies potice, Rachakonda Commissior :rate, Nacharam, police Station, R.R. r .;1r;61. "t To 1 3 4 q 6 t t SA GJP Ari.. uJ/. r"i , i. l5ii?i-fi \ .. HIGH COURT DATED:1 010912025 ORDER WP.No.24617 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. @rI \,E