Banoth Chandrdu v. I The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not providing Police protection to the petitioner to cultivate the Suit scheduled properties inspite of the lnjunction order granted by the Competent Civil Court in l. A. No. 19412017 in O. S. No. 209/2017 on the file of the Sub- Divisional Magistrate and Special Assistant Agent to Government, t\,4obile Court, Bhadrachlam, Bhadrari Kothagudem District, dated 1 1- 10- 2017. as illegal, arbit ary, discriminatory and violation of Articles; 14, 19,21 and 300- A of the Ccnstitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide Police protection to the petitioner to cultivate the suit scheduled properties in Sur"ey No. 27313 an extent of 0. 31 gts and l)urvey No. 2731504 an extent of AC 2. 22 gts situated at Pusugudem Village t\llulkalapalli Mandal, Bandrari Kothag rem District. lA NO: 'l OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the rircumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition. the High Cc,urt may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to provide Police protection to tlre petitioner to cultivate the suit scheduled properties in Survey No. 27313 an € xtent of 0. 31 gts and Survey No. 273150.+ an extent of AC 2. 22 gts situated at Pusugudem Village, Mulkalapalli Mandal Bandrari Kothaguem District pendirg disposal of the main W. P. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B.S.VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Rer;pondents No.1to3 : SRI M.SRINIVAS AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Rer;pondents No.4 to 6 : The Court made thr: following: ORDER jd/.-, -ffi: :;fiffi;-.--7/ THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24507 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learncd counsel for the petitioner and M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Covcrnment Pk:acler for Horne appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 WiLh their consent this w,rit petilion is takcn up for disposal at the admission stagc itself

2. -l'his writ pctition is filed seeking following prayer:- " to declare tle octiott of tlt rcs1tondet I No.3 ln not prottiding police protection to tlrc pctitioner to cuUionk the suit scfuduled properties inspite of the inlunctrcn order grnnlod by tlrc Competent Cit'il Court in 1.A.No.194/2017 in O.5.No.209/2017 on the fle ol tht Sub- DittisionnL Mngtstrute I Spectal Asststant Agent to Couemment, Mohile Com't, Blndrnchlnm, Bh rndri Kothagttdetn Distict, dated 17.10.2017, rts illegal, nrbitrnry, discririnatory and uiolation of ARliclles 14, 19, ?1 nnd 300 A o.f llrc Constitntion of lrulia and conseqret ly tlirccl Ilrc respotulcnl No.3 to prottide police protection lo tle petitioner to cultiTote tlr suit st'lrcduled properties in Suroey No.273/3 nn exte t of 0.37 guntas and sLLntey No.273/504 nn extent of Ac 2.22 gutttns, situated tt PustLguderu Villoge, Mulknlapalli Mnndal, Bhadrad r i Ko thagude n t D is tr ic t. "

3. Brief facts stated in this writ pctition are that petitioner claims to be owner of land admcasuring to an extcnt of Ac.0.32 guntas in Sy.No.273/3, Ac.2.22 guntas 1n Survey No.273/504, situated at Pusugudem Village, Mulaktapalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothaguclcm Dishict. The petitioner's name was recorded in thc revenue recortls and pattadar pass books and title deeds were also issued and the petitioner is in peacelul possession of the subiect property. The case of the petitioner is that on04.07.2025, respondent Nos.4 to 6 hespassed the petifioncr's land and theft mangoes and had spoiled remaining ) crops. Flenc., tl-rc petitioner madc a complaint a.c respondcnt No.3 under Section 189(2), 329(3),324(4)(5), 2s6(b),11s(2), 3st(z) r/tr, 190 of Bharatiya Naga'ik sura ksrr. sar.rhita, 2023 (hc,ein af ter re.fcrrt, 1 as ,BNSS,) No.106 of 2021 ,was registered agair.rst the rcspondcn Nos..l to 6. Further case of the petitiont,r is that the rcsponrlcnt Nos.4 and 6 d.r.elopccl grutlgc against the petit'oner a^rr n'ere not aroh'irg the petitio.c r to crrltivati, his tanrl. Tlrereaf ter' pcritio.er f,ed w.p.N..2 277g of 2021 ar r this Court t,ide order clatcd 17.09.20.11 passed the follon,ing orc.lcr:_ ar.rd Crime .hL,rc "Considat ing the tthovc s(tid LL\lr(L:l.\, this writ pctiti )n ,:S Llir^lx.).rcd (1. gt.unling lihert,", lo rh? petitionu in to ,,,nii, t;.,,n reprcsctltation 11 tly l,t re.ipondent_starion ltouse ilftir",,. \i,,t, kulopulli poliL,e Station, B\otlradri_ Kothagutle m Di.iiiri.,'i,i1, "r'r,inr,,,f o copy o/.ttrc orde, dartLt 25 02.2021 ii r A \,,, tit "t'ii'iit)'rl : ro t3, u, 20r,, porticul(;t ,tuy, ri*n om ptlr" ,ri,', ,1"J"',,r, iii'rir',,'i,i, r',',lil!,i::,:,if",l:,i respondeni shall con.sider tha sun^te. n'ra proviar', ,.,cessar.,v police protection to the subject properq) of the petifioner-'ir,r, in No co.rt.t tprcif c request lo provitlc poiit.e ornr"lr,,,, _a ,.

4. Subsequcnt to the orcler cjatccj 17.09.2021 pass, rl in \{l.1,.No.22279 of 2021, pctitionel rnade a representation and requostc I respondcni No.3 to pr.vide pc'licc ,rotection for cultir,;rtion.f the subjec land. However, the rcsp.ndc.t No 3 c{icr no.t g.ovide p()rice protection to trrt pertitioner. Aggrieved by tl.re same:, this writ petition is filed.

5. Leanted Assistant Governmcnt pleader for Home appcarir_rg for respondents Nos I to 3 praced on record instructions iss.rc.ti by sub I,spector of Police' Mulzrkala,arli porice statio., B^adraclri KothalJu,{crn District, nherein it is stated that the r)etitioner has not submitted any reprc!crltation and instead of i ! I w 3 making reprcsentatiory petitiolter has approached this court by fihng the writ petition with false and baseless ground against the respondent No.3.

6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner pray this Court to grant liberty to thc petitioner to make representation as per the direction in w.P.No.22779 of 2021 datecl 17.09.2021 and pray this Court to <lirect the respondent authorities to co.sider the petitioner's representation and pass orders in a time bound period. 7_ Rccording the submission madc by the learned counsel appearing on eithcr sicle and in terms of orcler datcti 17.09.2021, in w.p.No.22779 of 2021, this writ petition is disposcd of rn'ith a ribertl' to petitioner to make a fresh represcntation n'ithin a period of one (01) w.cek from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on such representation, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and pass order strictly in accorclance with law.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// S /. M.JAWAHAR REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, l.ThePrincipalsecretary,HomeDepartment,secretariat'StateofTelangana' Hyderabad.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' 3.TheStationHouseofficer,t\/ulakalapalliPolicestation,MulakalapalliMandal, Bhadrari Kothagudem Diskict.

4. One CC to SRI B.S.VENKATA RAMESH, Advocate' [OPUC] 5.TwoCCstoGPFoRHoNIE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana.[oUT] 6. Two CD CoPies. BSK TKS (\- HIGH COURT DATED:2010t112025 \, o 1'dE 3l C,\' I . :-r-. jt ,-'.,\ !.;i" 2ffi -)., 55,5'i ORDER WP.No.2460it of 2025 DISPOSING ICF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ^r# P"*