High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' Order or Direction' more particularly one in thenatureofWritofNlandamusdeclaringtheactionoftheRespondentNo.4 hereininfrequentlycallingtl\ePetitionertoPoliceStation,forcingandpressurizing the petitioner herein to setfle the aleged civir disputes craiming to be pending betweenthePetitionerhereinandtheRespondentNo.5hereinandalso interferingwiththepersonallifeandlibertyofthePetitionerherein,whichisillegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No' 4 herein' not to call the Petitioner to the police station at the behest of the Respondent No 5 herein and further direct not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner herein as guaranteed by the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 herein not to call the Petitioner to the police station at the behest of the Respondent No. 5 herein under the guise of alleged civil disputes and further direct not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner herein as guaranteed by the Constitution of lndia, pending disposal of main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.ARJUN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HONOUITABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.2453O of 2025 ORDER Heard learnqcl counsel for tht: pctitioner and Sri'M'Srinivas' learned Assistant Covcrntnent Plcadcr for I lome appe;rring for respondent Nos l to 4 With. their consent, this writ petition is being takcn up for disposal at the admission stage itself .

2. This writ petition has bcen f iled sceking the following Prayer:- "to declnre tlrc actiotr of tlu' Ilespondant No'4 lrcrein in frequently calling the Petitioner to Polttt SttlLott .forcing and pressurizing the Petitiiner heretn to settle tlrc nllegetl cn'il disputes claiming to be pending bettpeett tlrc Pe trtiLtnt'r herein trul tlrc Respondent No 5 herein 'and. alio interlering toith tlrc parsLttLtl lile rutl liberty of the Petitioner lrcrern tt,hich-is illignt, nrbttrtrtl rurd i'io|alnn o.[ Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndn rtid constqrLenthl tlu'ect tlrc Respondent No'4 lereit, not to inLt ttrc Petitiontr to tlu: .'olica stntion nt the belrcst of the Respontient No.S furein antl frrrtltcr dirct't not to interfere ruith the personal ti.[c anrl Liberty o.f llr Pctitiotrcr h':rein ns guarnnteed by tht Constitution of Indh."

3.Brieffactsstatec{inthiswritPctitiorrarcthatrespondentNo.5issued legal notice clater,l 04.09.2024 to petitioncr ar.rd his wife, alleging that the petitierner offercd to sell tlre agri, ultur,rl larrrls a.lmeasuring to an extent of Ac.1-25 gts in Sy.No.73lA/4/1 and Ac.0-35 gts in Sy No 73/AA/3' situated at Varadhavelli Village, IloinpallV N,landal, Raianna Sircilla District and further alleged that rcspondcnt No.5 paid an .tnrount ot Rs.10 lakh and Rs.50 lakhs to the petitioner and his wife and Agrecment of sale dated 11' '05 '2022, was also executed in favou'r of respontlcnt No.5. Thereafter, petitioner denying the allegation in legal notice clated 01.09.202+, scnt a rePly dated 19092024 to responclent No_5. rhe case of the petitioner is that rcspondent No.4 Police is I I frequentlv calling thc petitio.er to thc p.licc stati.rr.rncl pressurising, forci.g the petitioner to settle the a[eged pending civil clisputc rvith respondent No.5. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filccl. - x

4. Leanted Assistant Government plcadcr ftrr Home appearing for rcspondent Nos l to 4 praced on record irlstructio.s issucd b' Circre-r,spector of Police, Vemulawatla Rural Circle, Raja..a Sircilla District, wherein it is statecl that respondent No.5 on 78.07.2025 mac{c a complair_rt and the respondent No 4 zrrde sr'No 20 cnterecr thc sa.rc r^ loccpti,. registcr anrl called the petitioner for enquiry. Thereafter, the petiti..er wrote a letter a^.l stated tlrat he will come on 22.07.2025 ancl scttle the issuc, however, thc petitioner dicl not come rt is further statccr trrat trrc rcsponclcnt r *v..J forccd nor pressurized the petitioner to settle thc civil rlispute. ^cither

5. Recorcling the submissions made br. lcarnecl counscl appearing on cither sidc anr-l rvithout erpressing dn\ r,Ii;1iq111 on Ilrr,rr]cr.rls,,l tlri,cast.this writ petition is disposed of clirectir-rg the respondent authnr.itrcs to follor,r.clue process as co,temprated under law before initiati^g a.r .rction on petitio,cr. 6. With the above direction, this writ lletition is clisposecl of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pcncling, s^all stanri closccl. No.rcler as to costs. I \ //TRUE COPYII s D/-P. PONNA KRISH NA S ISTANT REGIS TRAR \ secrroru oFFIcE R Se tariat, Tankbund Road, To, 1 z The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad, Stats ef Telbngan6. The Director General of Headquarters, Hyoeraoad-Jo3l%? state of relangana, Lakdikapool Police 3 The Superintendent of Police, Sircilla, Rajanna Sircilla District_ - 4 E 6 The lnspector of Police, Vemulawada Rural Circle' Vemulawada Town' Rajanna Sircilla District. One CC to SRI B.ARJUN RAO, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] \ Two CD CoPies -D 7 BSR GJP i I I HIGH COURT DATED: 1910812025 ORDER WP.No.24530 of 2025 ) ] ."-a AI 21 AIJB 26 t t D t St'l i it't Lu DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 9\ d- €