The High Court · 2025

2.' The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana' Hyderabad' ...Respondents/Respondents/comprainants lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 07.07.2025 in CRLA.No.42 of 2024 on the file of Judge, Family court-cum-lll Additional Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, in confirming the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nakerekal. Nalgonda District Judgment in CC.No.348 of 2014,, dated. 17-12- 2024, pending disposal of the criminal revision petition in the interest of justice. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: '1. Rekireddy Revinder Reddy, S/o. Narsi Reddy, Age: 54 years, Occ: Business, R/o. VT Colony, Nakerekal Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. ... RespondenUPetitioner

2. Anugu Dhanamma, Wo. Ram Reddy, Age: 53 years, Occ: household, R/o.Flat No.3 ll Floor, Radhakrishna Nilayam, Dwarakamni Nagar, Auto Nagar, Hayathnagar Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/Respondent AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/Respondents/Com plainants Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and Respondent No.1/Complainant to compromise and compound the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable lnstrument Act in the above said CRL.RC.No.591 ol 2025, in the interest of Justice lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by allowing the Criminal Revision Case No. 591 ol 2025 filed by the petitioner against the order in Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2024, daled: 07 -07 -2025 on the file of the Judge Family Court cum lll Additional Sessions Judge. N algonda District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Chalakani Venkat Yadav Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Kandula Naresh Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.591 ot 2025 osTH DEcEMBER, 2025 Between: Anugu Dhanamma. Petitione r AND The State of Telangana Rep. through Public Prosecutor and 1 other. . Respondents COMMONORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceeding against her in C.C.No.34B o'f 2014 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-Junior Civit Judge, Nakrekal for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.'l , that during pendency of the present Criminal Revlsion Case, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences. 2

3. Vide order dated 24.10.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report 4 Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submifted a report, dated 29.10.2025 and the same is placed on record

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.348 of 2014 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum- Junior Civil Judge, Nakrekal, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/- N SRIHARI EPUTY REGISTRAR \ /TTRUE COPY/I SECTION OFFICER Judge, Nalgonda f First Class, Nakrekal' rosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at To,

1. 2. |, 4 E 6 The Judge, FamilY Court-cum-lll Additional Sessio udicial Magistrate o cs to the Public P The J Two C 3ll"tt?S l?u"t1","*'"' Venkat Yadav' 4q'::1t: toPucl il:Ei i6 sn x'nu'r' Naresh' Advocate [oPUCl Two CD CoPies (Along with a Copy of MOU and Joint Memo) Kam/PSt \qr I HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 I COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/and CRLRC.No.591 of 2025 STA o 2 t Jtil 826 * fl. -"'\ BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE ARE ALLOWED anl: "'"xc I I I I I i MEMORAI\DUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PE'UTION (Filed Under Sec.359 (6) of B.N.S.S) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OT'TELANGAI{A .99") of2o25 €rP.No. <tW2-c_ Betweea: Anugu Dhanamma W/o. Ram Reddy, Aged about 53 years, occ: household, R/o.Flat No.3, II Floor, Radhakrishna Nilayam, Dwarakamni Nagar, Auto Nagar, Hayathnagar, Hyderabad AND . . Appellant/ Appellant/ Respondent Rekireddy Revinder Reddy S/o. Narsi Reddy, Aged about 54 years, occ: Business, R/o.VT Colony, Nakerekal Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. . . . Respondent/ Respondents/ Complainant The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad 1 2 . . . Respondents/ Respondents/ Complainant MOU AND JOINT MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND THE RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT.

1. It is submitted that the petitioner herein filed the above Criminal Revision Case. No. 591 of 2025, challenging the Order in Crimina,l Appeal. No. 42 of 2024, dated: O7-07-2025 on the file Judge, Family Court Cum III Additional Sessions Judge at Nalgonda District in which confirmed the Order in CC. No. 34a/2O14, d.ated: 77-12-2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nakrekal.

2. I submit that 1"'respondent have lodged a cbmplaint against the Appellant herein/Accused, who is a known person to him and for non-payment of cheque amount of Rs. 3,5O,OOO/- and the saine was given by 1"' respondent at the rate of 24o/o per af^um and she executed a promissory note and iSsued cheque barring. No. 022826, Dated: 04-06-2024 but she did not repay the afiiount. I filed the complaint against the appellant herein seeking initiate action under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. After hearing the case, the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of 1"'Class, Nakrekal on 17-12-2O24 passed an order convicting the appellant with sentence to undergo simple imprisonment of three months and directed to pay cornpensation of Rs. 6,00,0OO/-. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant herein liled CRL.A. No. 42 of 2O24 on the file of the Judge Farnily Court Cum III Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District and the Hon'ble District Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal on Q7-07-2025. Hence filed Criminal Revision Case. No. 59 1 of 20205, challenging the same, pending Criminal Revision Case, both the parties are compromised before the elders. It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to compound the offence with the 1"' Respondent/Complainant herein by recording compromise and by allowing the Criminal Revision Case. No. 591 (' I 1 l of 2025 filed by the petitioner against the Order in Criminal Appeal. No. 42 of 2024, dated: 07-07-2025 on the file of the Judge Family Court Cum III Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deern fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. n 6Ad> Petitioner/Appellant (A. Dhanamma) Hyderabad, Dt. .to.2025 COUNSEL FOR THE PtrTITIONBR PELLANT eabRT 1"'Respondent/ Complainant (R. Ravinder Reddy) Hyderabad, Dt%.10.202s k, Nartu.-- COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDNET I ,l