The High Court · 2025

'1. Smt.V. Sujatha,, WO Ramakistaiah, Age 45 years, Occ. Cook Govt. SW Girls Hostel, Cherial Siddipet District.

2. S.Jampaiah,, S/O Yellaiah , age 45 years, Occ. Watchmen Govt. SW Boys Hostel, [\tlulkanoor, Hanumakonda District.

3. Smt. Jayalaxmi,, WO Rala Ram Age 49 years, Occ. Kamati Govt. SW Girls Hostel (A) Hanamakonda, Warangal Urban District.

4. Suvarna,, WO Ashok, age 49 years Occ. Watchmen, Govt. SW Boys Hostel Palakurthy, Jangaon District.

5. Md. Rajamahammad,, S/O Ankoos Ali, Age.48 years, Occ. Watchmen Govt. SW Boys Hostel, (B) Narsampet, Warangal District (Rural).

6. M. Yadagiri,, S/O Narsaiah, Age49 years, Occ. Kamati, Govt. SW Boys Hostet Zaff argad, Jangaon District.

7. A.Ravikumar, S/0 Janagardhan Age48 years, Occ. Kamati, Govt. SW Boys Hostel, Nekkonda, Warangal District (Rural) ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J

4. Sikta Patnaik lAS,, District Collector (SW) Warangal Urban, Warangat Smt. Distr Smt. Nirmala,, Joint Director, S, C Development Department, Warangal Urban , Warangal District. Sri. Rahul Bojja, IAS,, (l/c) Director, SC Development Department, D.S. S. Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. Sri.Rahul Bojja, lAS,, Principal Secretary, Social welfare Department State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS I I I i lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ: nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court r ray be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner in t I I above Contempt Case on 2510412024 . lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circ I nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court r ray be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner in t r I above Contempt Case on 2510412024 . Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. ARVIND KUMAR KI,'A Counsel forthe Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENEFT,L The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V' SHRAVAN KUMAR c.C. No.231 7 of2023 ORDER: Alleging the violation of the or<lers passed by this Court In W.P. No.39335 of 201 7 on 28'O3 2023' present Contempt Case is hled seeking to summon thc respondents ancl punish them under Section 10 and 12 o[ the Conte mpt Courts Act Learned counsel for the pe [itioners would submit that this 2. court has elabor:rlcll' c<;nsidcrcd thc case of the petitioners and disposed of thc rr"rir petitlon dirccting the respondents to pay the minimumtimescaleofpayattachedtothepostsheldbythe petitioners from the clalc of passing of iLrterim orcler dated 05 01'20i8 with a further dircction Lo thc rcspondcnt authorities to consider the case of lhe petitloners for abso rplron / regularization in terms of G.o.Ms.No.2l2,FinanceandPlanning(PC.IiI),Department,dated 22.O4 ).gg4 and tn Lcrms ol thc orclcrs passed b)' lhe Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka Vs' Uma Devi and State of Punjab & Others Vs. Jagiit Singh & Others ar-rd pass appropriate orders in accordance u'ith lau' as expccliliousll' as possible preferably within a period of eight u'e cks from t he dal-c of receipt of a copy of the order and communicate the same to the petitioners' 3 Learned Spccial Governmcnt Pleader appearing for the the Proceedings oI respondents h:rs Plact:ci a No.ht 12661 )002/l{NIi, d"'\tcd 27 08 2024 coPY issucd bY the District 2 Collector and MagisLrate (SC Deveiopn r rLt Department) Hanumakonda DistricL, and submirted that thc c:r;: ot [hc petitioners was considcred and the petiLtoners are paid thc lcndir-rg arrears of mtn num time scale of pay, tvhich has not beer disputed by the learned counscl for the pctitioners It is furl l-icr. s I bmitted that the case of the petitioners was considered r.idc: ..:_oceedings dated 27.O8.2024 and thereafter, the petltioners did not r. ke any steps if so aggrieved by the said proceedings ancl praycd thrs r ourt to close the Contcmpt Case.

4. It is to be seen that this Court had lisposed of the W.P. No.3933S of 20l7 on 2g.O3.2O2ll with rhc atr -csaid directions and thereafter, in tcrms ol thc satd clircctions, c.lso ,l thc petitioncrs was considered and orders are passccl r i l<: No.AI /266/2O02IHNK dated 27.O8.2O24 and th,t pe titioners are already paid the pending arrears of minimum timc sr:i le o[ pay, wl_rich has not been disputed b_r, thc ie arned cou nsel lir the petitioners. Hence, it cannot be saicl that the respondents havc i.c latcd the orders passed by this Courr in W.p. No.3933S oI 201 .i tn 28.03.2023. However, if the petitioncrs still fcel aggrievecl, iL is alrr 1s lcft open for the petitioners to pursuc the rcrnedies as availabie urr I :r law. Proceedings

5. Recording the above, this Contempt Case rs clr I cl. There shall be no order as to costs Asa sequcl, miscellaneous applications, if any penrling, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SO/. A.PRATHIMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Smt. Sikta Patnaik lAS,, District Collector (SW) Warangal Urban, Warangal District

2. smt. Nirmala,, Joint Director, s. c Development Department, warangal Urban , Warangal District

3. Sri. Rahul Bojja, lAS,, (l/c) Director, SC Development Department' D'S S Bhavan, Masab Tank, HYderabad'

4. Sri.Rahul Bojja, lAS,, Principal Secretary' Social welfare Department State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 5 One CC to SRl. ARVIND KUMAR KATA Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI- ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRl. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL Advocate [OPUC] S.TwoCCstoGPFORSERVICESV'HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana' louTl

9. Two CD CoPies TUgh -'a:--' , 1\. ,, IE ?ffi

1.'/r' HIGH COURT DAfEO:2910712O25 ORDER CC.No.2317 ot 2023 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE J