✦ High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
11 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,351 words

2. Rajam (Kalal) Dhanaiah, S/o.late antaiah, aged about 66 years. 3. Mohd. Yousuf Khan, S/o. Gulam Moinuddin Khan aged about 58 years, 4. Mohd. Aaiz Khan, S/o. S/o. Gulam Moinuddin Khan aged about 49 years 5. Anees Fatima, Wo. Mohd Ayub Khan, aged about 46 years 6. Mohd.Usman Khan, S/o late Gulam Jabbar Khan, aged about 50 years, 7. Jakir Begum, D/o. late Mohd. Manzoor Ahmed Khan, aged about 44 years B. Asangari Kristaiah (died) (died) Rep. by his LRs. Petitioner No.29 9. Asangari Veeraiah (died), (died) Asangari Veeraiah (died) 'l0.Asangari Raju, S/o. late A. Ramaiah aged about 45 years 1 1 . Asangari Chittari (died), Rep. by his LRs. Petitioners 34 to 36 12. Asangari Bikshapati, S/o. late A. Pochaiah aged about 49 years '1 3. Asangari Anjaiah (since died), Rep. by his LR. Petitioner No.37 '14. Smt. Manemma, Wo. late Sathaiah, aged about 69 years 15. N. Narsing Rao, S/o. late Sathaiah, aged about 49 years '16. N. Laxman Kumar,, S/o. late Sathaiah, aged about 41 years '17. N. Srinivas Rao, Sio. late Sathaiah, aged about 40 years 18. Nadiminti Samaiah alias Sathaiah (died), Rep. by his LRs. Petitioner No.38 19. Nadiminti Agamaih (died), (died) Rep. by his LRs. Petitioners 39 and 40 20. Seri Papireddy, , S/o. laie Linga Reddy, aged about 79 years. 21. Seri Amrutha Reddy,, S/o.late Linga Reddy, aed about 76 years. 22. Gudisetti Shankaraiah (died), (died) Rep. by his LRs. Petitioners 41 to 46 ,) ':r".

23. Mohd.Allauddin,, Sio.Nizamuddin, aged about 59 years. 24. Mohd.lmamuddin,, S/o.Nizamuddin, aged about 58 years 25. C. Chandraiah, , S/o. Late Durgaiah, aged about 50 years. 26.C.Bagaiah, S/o.late Ramaiah, aged about 47 years. 27. C.Ramachandraiah,, S/o. Late C.Mallaiah, aged about 48 years 28. C.Shekar, S/o. Late C.Mallaiah, aged about 45 years F)etitioners 1 to 28 are residents of Velimela Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

29.A.Manga, Wo. Asangari Pentaiah, Daughter in law.of Asangari Kristaiah aged about 36 years, resident of H.No.3-90, Velimela Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District

30.Asangari Padmamma, Wo. Late Asangari Veeraiah, aged about 56 years, 3l.Asangari Raju, Sio. Late Asangari Veeraiah, aged aboul: 38 years, 32.Asangari Balraj, S/o. Late Asangari Veeraiah, ,aged about 3'1 years, 33.Asangari Hari Krishna, Sio. Late Asangari Veeraiah, aged about 28 years, Petitioners 30 to 33 are residents of Velimela Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

34.Asangari Narsimlu, , S/o. Late Asangari Mallesh, Grandson of Late Asangari Chittari aged about 46 years,

35.Asangari Laxman, S/o. Late Asangari Mallesh, Grandson of Late Asangari Chittari, aged about 42 years,

36.Asangari Nagesh, S/o. Late Asangari Mallesh, Grandson of Late Asangari Chittari, aged about 34 years, Petitioners 34 to 36 are residents of Velimela Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy Dislrict. 3T.Ashamgari Jangaiah, , S/o. Late Ashamgari Anjaiah, aged about 54 years, resident of H.No.4-21, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Velimula, Muthangi, Medak District. 3S.Nadiminti Devamma, , W/o. Late Nadiminti Samaiah, aged about 78 years, resident of H.No.567, MIG Phase 1, Near Jersey Pa.lour, Ramachandram Municipality, Medak.

39. Nadiminti Yadamma, , Wo. Late Nadiminti Agamaih, aged about 64 years, resident of H.No.5-38, amachandrapuram Mandal, Velimula Muthangi, Medak District.

40. K. Vasantha, , D/o. Late Nadiminti Agamaih, aged about 41 years, resident of H.No 1-1O3/3, asj id Banda, Near Community Hall, rilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.

41. G.Muralidhar,, S/o. Late G.Shankaraiah, Jaged about 62t years, 42. G. Manjula, , Wo. Late G.Praveen Kumar, Daughter-in-law of Late G.Shankaraiah, aged about 49 years,

43. G.Rishi Chandra, S/o. Late G.Praveen Kumar, G.andson of Late G. Shankaraiah, aged about 23 years, 44 G.S G.S

45.G.R G.S ai Siddartha, S/o. Late G.Praveen Kumar, Grandson of Late hankaraiah, aged about 24 yea$, avi Chandra, S/o. Late G.Nageshwar Rao, Grandson of Late hankaraiah, aged about-42 years, WW 46 Gudishew swaona.. D/o..Late G.Nageshwar Rao, Grand-daughter of Late G. 3'l€i1Ti?is,i7sL,i.f,:t1?r:aEgl,_"ru:ji".*s:i':iil.dla:, AND ...PETITIONERS

1. Smt. Valluru Kranti, IAS, District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 2. Navin Mittal. IAS (i 996) principal Secretary to Govt., (Land Revenue), Reven ue Depa rtme nt, s'ecreti iai, Ht; ;;;;rrl: """.. (R2 is impteaded as oer the Court Order dtd.15.04 .2028 in CC No.2502t2024). lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section.lsr cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit fired in support or *re petiiion may be preased preased to dispense with the oresence of Respondeni r.r"]r "" 11ro6r2o2sin cc No.2502 in tA No. 3 ot 2017 passed in wp Nt.'ioioi or 2Ol2before this Hon,bte t.1::, -irru"nigi'ior.t IA NO: 2 0F 2025 . Petition under Section.1.l1 Cpg praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support ot tne petition, ih""H,gi'iorrt may be preased preased to dispense with the presence of Respondeni N;:, ;; 11rc6t2025 in cc No. 2502 in lA No. 3 of 2017 passed in wFr.r" io:zoi of 201zo"ror" t"'[on or" t.:":^^ Counsel for the petitioner(s): SRI B SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER i I* HONOURABLE SRI ruSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.2502 of 2024 ORDER: Alleging violation of the order dated26.09.2023 passed by this Court in I.A.No.3 of 2017 in Writ Petition No.10205 of 2072, the piesent Contempt Case is filed.

2. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents has placed on record a copy of Memo No.15984/Land AdminJV/A2 12019 dated 09.06.2025 issued by respondent No.2, wherern it is stated that the District Collector, Sangareddy was permitted to return the original Demand Draft of Rs.31 lakhs bearing DD No.45179 dated 18.10.2023 to the petitioners and was also directed to take necessary action accordingly.

3. Learned Governtnent Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioners submits a fresh demand draft, the responclent authorities .) ) would receir.e the same and comply the order dated 26.09.2023 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2017 in Writ Petition No.10205 of 2072 arrd further pray this Court to close the present contempt case. I I

4. At this stage, Iearned counsel for the petitioners pray this Court to grant some time to the petitioners to submit fresh dernand draft and further pray this Court to direct the respondenl authorities to receive the fresh demand draft and comply the order dated 76.09.2023 passed in I A'No.3 of 2017 in writ petition No.10205 of 2072in a time bound period 5 Learned Government pleader for Revenue did not dispute the 6 Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this Contempt Case is ciosed rvith a liberty to the petiticners to submit fresh demancl draft within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this oiCer and thereafter, the respondent authorities are dir:ected to receive the fresh demand dr.aft and comply rhe order dated 26.09.2023 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2017 n Writ Petition No.10205 of 2012, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the fresh demand d raf t. 7 ' Accordingly, trris Contempt case is closecl. Miscelaneous applications, if any pending, shail stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII SD/. M EPUTY OHD.ISMAIL REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER One CC to SRI B SATTSH KUMAR Advocate tOpUCI

2. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana 3. Two CD Copies SS I To, 1 HIGH COURT DATED:1110612025 I -..a.,. i:qr ;{. 1 I ;u}l illi (i. \' e '+ l1.,.^ ,..,rc, .-.. '+ =.=-,/ ORDER CG.No.2502 of 2024 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS 6 pr 11 1 I 1 I I I I I I i t

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments