Mahesh Cfa{g_C[oyrdhary v. 1. The State Of Telangana

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the cir( rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to hand over to the petitioner, his st r,s 1)Smart phones 2No's, 2) laptop (H.P Company/make), F.S.L Report, .,l61 S atements of a[ the witnesses & suicide Note, if any, as referred in the Final Re )ort in cr.No.235 of 2016, registered on the file of P.S Ghatkesar. l.A. NO: 2OF 2017(WPMP NO: 21846 OF 20171 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma/ be pleased to direct the 6th respondent, c.B.c.r.D, to take-up the matter irom thr: 4th respondent and conduct reinvestigation of the case to cull out the truth, hidder behind the death of the Petitioner's innocent son i.e Roshan Kumar Choudhary. l.A. NO: 3OF 2017 (WPMP. NO:21 847 0F 20171 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that initfie cir: rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma,r re pleased to direct the 4th respondent, not to fire his, finar report dt. 09.12.2016 ir cr.No.235 ot 2o16 registered on the file of the P.s Ghatkesar dt. 29.06.2016 b-. ore the xlll M.M at L.BNagar and may further direct the Magistrate to not to act r pon the finar report d|.9.12.2016, if filed by the 4th Respondent uis 17 4(2) of Cr F ). i counsel for the Petitioner: MS. DlwA RAN| Representing sir ll KlsHoRE RAr Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 4 & 6: MR. R. LAXMIK/I {TH REDDY, AGp FOR HOME [r ;) Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER --7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.17889 OF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: "...fo issue a writ or order more padicularty one in the nature of wril of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.4 as we as Respondent No.3 for not conducting the investigation in Cr.No.23S of 2016 registered on the file of P.S.Ghatkesar on 29.06.2016 thoroughly in a proper and diligent manner and also not in accordance with Law amounting to violation of Artictes 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia with a further direction to Respondent No.4 to not to file his final repoft dt.09.12.2016 in Cr.No.235 of 2016 registered on the file of P.S. Ghatkesar before the Magistrate concerned and fufther direct the Magistrate concerned not to act upon the final reporT dt.9.12.2016 if filed by the 4th Respondent u1s.1742 of Cr.P.C and fufther direct the 4th Respondent to hand over the case file to the 6th Respondent with a direction to the 6th Respondent to conduct reinvestigation thoroughly and deligentty in Cr.No.235 of 2016 registered on dt.29.06.2016 on the fite of P.S.Ghatkesar to cull out the truth hidden behind the death of my son and to pin down the culprits and make them face the prosecution and to pass such other order or orders ...."

2. Heard Ms.Divya Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr-R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 4. ( I

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as the police authorities failed to conduct proper investigation in Crime.No.235 of 2016 on the file of P.S., Ghatkesar, this petition has been filed. The c.ounsel further submits that in the counter of the respondent No.3, it has 2 been specified that the lnvestigation officer of Police Sl: tion, Ghatkesar has filed final report. Later, report was recalled for furt.r.r investigation. However, there is no instruction as to further develo rments. Hence, prayed for necessary directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would ;ubmit that the original final report was filed, however, on reconsideratic 1 the report was withdrawn and the matter was foruvarded to the Centr rl Crime Station (CCS) police for further investigation. Subsequr: ttly, upon the investigation, the final report was filed endorsing 'undetected' on

16.03.2024. Thus, the contest raised in this petition dot:: not subsist. S. Having regard to the developments transpire<l pending of this petition, and as the contest raised by the petitioner ha: been effectively addressed by the respondent police, this Writ Petitior is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall star d closed. //TRUE GOPY// SI /. JAWAHAR REDDY AS;I ISTANT REGISTRAR G* SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI KISHORE RAl, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (TG), High Court for the s tate of Telangana.

3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE(TG) , High Court for re State of Telangana 4. Two CD Copies a TJ HIGH COURT DATED:0810912025 ORDER WP.No.17889 of 2017 Io HES 2 J A i\i 2 026 C '.\) O * v .i,y' l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 3l { I