✦ High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,101 words

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY oF SEPTEI\,BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ' .' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Between: smt.Kondakala Bh.avani, wo.Late.p.Venkatesh, D/o.Late.Kondakara 33li33fu f g?iri33l'rl,',,,11,1fi ;PF:,Jii;ii,-Ir:"rg,"Si{i,l#.:j:xr AND PETITIONER Secretariat, HyderabSd. 1' The State of Telangana, Rep by Prl secretary Municipal Administration, 2. The Commissioner, HMDA, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 3. The commissioner, Manikonda Jagir Municipality, puppalaguda, RR District 4. M/s-Kedia Homes pvt.. Ltd, Rep .by its _Director Ajay Kumar Kedia s/o. R:Y6:3il-,ffi Tf, ["[:? jih"flg:i,"fli1,#,il"i"t3f :,;::,:ur)'ilop,o,

5. 1Vtl9 {aV Kumg Susheet Kumar, Rep !r]9.!a-g-deesh Rai Agarwat ngeO iUoui 2- 1 63, Maharajg u nj, liyderaba"d. by partner Ramavtar 61 years Occ.Business Agarwal S/o R/o.H.No.15- 6- M/s LANSUM properties LLp, Fqq. uv Managilg partner Kunapa Reddy Umesh s/o K N Rao Aqed about +b y";n-; o;dalsinesJbn'.-'plot No.283, Road No.78, Jubili hills, iyderabad ...RESPONDENTS ' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, otter or directions more particularly writ of mandamus to declare the orders of the respondents No.2 g6 3 dated3- 6-2025 in permit No'01231slBPlHMDAt2736tsKPt2o23 granted building permission orders in favor of respondent No.6 to construct the residentiat building blocks in petitioners property agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0-19.Gts in Sy.No.179/part, adm Ac.0- 38.Gts in sy.No.18o/part, adm.0-08.Gts in Sy.No.222lpar1' adm Ac.o-2'l .Gts in sy.No.227lpart and adm Ac.0-39.Gts in Sy.No.228lpart situated at Puppalaguda Vitt"g", Gandipet (Raiendranagar) Mandal, RR District, id arbitrary, illegal, against to the principles of law and building permission rules. consequentially to direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to cancel the building permission orders dated 3-6-2025 in Permit No.012315/BP/HMDA/2736/SKPI2O23 in respect of petitioner ProPerty' IANO:1O F2 025 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation/objections of petitioner daled 17 -7 -2025 to take action to stop the illegal constructions by suspending the building permission orders dated 3-6-2025 granted in respect of subject properties pending disposal of main Writ Petition' IA No :3OF 20 25 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit petitioner to file additional material Writ Petition in WP.No-24779 ot 2025. IANO:2OF2025 Between: e-r (nnrtakala Bhavani, Wo.Late.P.Venkatesh, D/o.Late.Kondakala Slioriii,-ns"o qbout 39 years, Occ. House wife, R/oflat No.2-04, Tripgg "3rd Floor, Balaji Nagar, Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR HEjii""tv, District ...PETrroNER AND Rep bv Prr secretary Municipal Administration' ' *:,"t:?I&, "rlJ3l3il:31" 2. The Commissioner, HMDA, Ameerpet, Hyderabad' 3. The Commissioner, Manikonda Jagir Municipality, Puppalaguda, RR District , n , *- , * i ,t t * t t, .* *. , * . r+.'t

4. M/s.Kedia Homes Pvt Ltd, Rep by its.-Director Aiav Kumar Kedia s/o' Dr.Mahesh Kumar Kedia, Aged"^i3ri'-qz-yg;.rq, occ. Business, R/o- Plot No.4g, Sri krupa Market, MahbooilMlnsion, Hyderabad. -lvlalakpet,

5. M/s Aiay Kumar Susheel Kumar,. Rep^9y p11ry' Ramavtar Agarwal S/o Late.Jagdeesh Rai Agarwal nged'iOorl Oi'y,iars Occ'Business R/b'H' No' 1 5- 2-163, Maharajgunj, HYderabad. 6 if t,'"' [ Uf " Road No.78, Jubili hills, Hyderabad- HIS H:o'5 ft ,][?B #:'y i3 33] Bfl ^f 7. 'K.Vasulakshmi Kant, S/o. Late K. Saibaba' R/o. H.No.1-38, ilpirlrgrda, -OanOipet Mandal' R'R' District' ' ^9e! f'3X: %#: Eil" -::'tt j6^ye.a1s' Occ: Business'

8. K.Naveen kant, S/o. Late K. Saibab-a, 4g."1 ! !9^'"' Occ: Business' R/o' H.No-r-ro, pupbaragrOi, Oinoipet Mandal, R'R' District'

9. N.Rami Reddy, S/o. N.P.Reddy, 4g"9 ,7,?v,",?\':-Occ: H yd e ra b a d' 2 -2s3 t 82 t Ns s i, E6 ao- M. rZ l',j b i 6e H i I I s, - Business' R/o' H'No'8- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the respondents 7 to 9 as party respondents in the writ petition in W.P.No._ ot 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt MOHD IUIUMTAZ PASHA Counset for the Respondent No.I: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V.NARASIMHA GOU?' SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI K'LAXMAIAH' SC FOR MCPL Counsel for the Respondent No.6: M/s. RESU LAW OFFICE The Court made the following: ORDER + * t * t f, I i * fr- + * + *- t * i. * rF t t*. f -'.:- : - HONOURABLE SRTJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY l.A.No.2 ot 2025 IN/AND WRIT PETITION N o-24779 OF 2025 coM MON ORDER l.A.No.2 of 2025 is filed seeking to implead the proposed respondents as respondent Nos.7 to 9 in the writ petition.

2. Mr. Mohd. Mumtaz Pasha, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a writ petition afresh, and to that effect, he filed a letter dated 22.09.2025 before the Registry.

3. Permission is accorded, and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a writ petition afresh and, in view of withdrawal of the writ petition' no orders are necessary to be passed in l.A.No.2 ol 2025 and accordingly the same is closed. No order as to costs. , As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPY'/ SD'.M. NAGAMANI ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI MOHD MUMTAZ PASHA' Advoca 2. One CC to M/s. RESU LAW OFFICE, Advocate [OP cl 3. One CC to SRI V NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI K.LAXMAIAH, SC FOR MCPL [OPUC] PUCI 0 5. T*o CCs to Gp FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies i f , * I iF t e- e'*t I fr. f I * + ; *' t I + i. + * , ls" , * i * * + * I l HIGH COURT DATED: 2StOgt2O2S COI,IMON ORDER l.A. No.2 of 2O2S I WP.No.247Tg of 2025 I ri':l .: ;;; ," 18tICM '9 1(\ * f o'.'.,,^ 1 1',-1 r-{} A DISIUISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS CLOSING THE I.A., WITHOUT COSTS I WTHDRAWN& J -__<--.'- .1 ,, : " , _:9:J*"x*i;.' sa; t I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments