Kokkiligadda Venkateswara Rao v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C V NAGARJUNA REDDY
Provisions considered
Judgment
Counsel for the Respondents : None November 09, 2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ In this petition, the petitioner has made the following substantive prayer:
It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ specially one writ of mandamus declaring the proviso to sub section 4 of section 4 of A.P.Farmers Management of Irrigation Systems Act, 1997 as ultra virus and unconstitutional and consequently setting aside the order of postponement of elections issued by respondent no.1 in proceedings no.20973/CAD.IV/97 dt. 3-7-97 by directing respondents to conduct elections to President, 95- Gangidipalem Water User Association, Tenali division, Guntur District by continuing election process before conducting elections of President of 2 Distributory committee, Tenali Division (intermediate provisions of A.P.Farmers Management of Irrigation level) Guntur District under System, Act, 1977 and pass such other or further orders as the Hon’ble court deems fit and proper
. Since no one has appeared for the petitioner, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed in default. Ordered accordingly. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08-11-2006
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.