i Sri. R.Ganapathi Reddy v. UD Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an applopriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandainus by declaring the action of the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates in irlterfering and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in respect of liis Plot No. 479, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Block - A, Gowthami ,Nagar, Ed ulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy Didtrict and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and I I I consequently direct the respondent No.5 and his sub-ordi ates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plot I o. 479, admeasuring 500 square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. '135 part, situated tt Block A, Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally village, Ramchandrapuram [Vand:Ll Sangareddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing ani totice. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 , Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci thd affidavit filed in suppbrt of the petition, the High Court ma the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere t the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 479, admeasuring 5t) A, in Sy. No. 135 part, :situated at Block-A, GoMhami N:r lumstances stated in 7 be pleased to direct ,ith the possession of ) square yards, Block rar, Ed ulanagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, rithout following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitiorier: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Cdunsel forthe Resporident Nos.1,3,4 and 5: SMT. S. SRI\ /ANTHl, i i AGP FoR RI:'|ENUE Counsel for the Resporident No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL AE MINISTRATION i I Counsel for the ResporJdent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA tl :DDY, URBAN DEVELOPMEN] I ThE Court made the follow ing: ORDER SC FOR MUNICIPALITIE S a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3O5 28 of 2O2l THE ITTH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Sri R.Ganapathi Reddy ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, AND Rep. by the Special Chief Secretar5r to Government , Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & (5) others. ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalitibs, appearing for the respondents. perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent No.5 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in ] 2 respect of petitioner's Plot No.479, Block A, t. Sy.No.135 part, situated at Gowtharni Nagar, Edulalag_ a.lapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy Distr < t (for brevity, ..the subject property") and threatening to dispossr ss the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice and without foilowing due process of 1aw, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furtlr :r submits that, rvhile admitting the matter, this Court passed ir.r .erim order dated

26.11.2021 directing the official respondents n<r to interfere with the petitioner's possession over the subject p: )perty, except in accordance with the procedure established by 1 rw. However, in spite of -lapse of more thal four years, the resp,r rdent authorities have not filed counter or vacate petition for denli rg the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. ln , iew of the same, learned counsel requested this Court Lo allow tt r directing the respondent authorities not to i - possession of the petitioner over the subject Writ Petition by lerfere with the rropert5r without following due process of law.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Gov :rnment pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in 1 ossession of the subject property, the respondents will not i. erfere -"vith the 3 petitioner's possession over the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, sha1l stand closed. SD/. M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER' To, \ TJ

1. The Soecial Chief Secretary to Govt' The State.of Telangana' Revenue ' #;r-,i;;;i, aRk Bnrrun, i.S. secretariat, Hvderabad' , Y;5?;il;i";r-s"doiu.v to'eout.1n" State of ielangana' MA and UD - oeoartment. T.S. Secrbtariat, Hyderabad ^ 3 ih56i;i*f bori""ior, Sansareddv District at Sangareddv' 4. The Revenue oivisionattEic;l%ft;;"ddv oiitiict at Sangareddv' 5: iii; i;h;ila;r, Ramchandrapuram M-andal, Sansareddv District' o. iii;cilri;iJrion"r, rerra"prllrrlunicioititvr!919q.'r' sarisareddv District' 7. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raiu' Advocate [oPUUl- B. i;; CC;lo Gfioi n"r"nij., Higtr Court'tor the-State of Telangana' at g. iit|"ctiJ ir," cp to,. Municipal Administration Urban Development' High " c"Jrt t"iine Slate of Telangana, at Hyderabad[oUT1 10. one cc to Sri putta rra"trn"JiE'd;v: 6cl;;M'hicipelitiesloPucDl r'1 1.Two CD CoPies Hvderabad [OUT] t /, HIGH COURT I DATED:17 11212025 ( )3 - \: r, ._,. .. .I,, ' 'i .,'.i\ /-\'. \ .z\-l J 0i i ) jn . rl ..:', il -i..'// t,. ','/ ,l?j"' ORDER l: WP.No.30528 ot 2021 .,\ , .t1..' rr' . ' -:1. D SPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( \ h *