The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates in interfering and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 300, Block A, in Sy. No. '1 35 part, situated at GoMhami Nagar, Edulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.5 and his sub-ord r ates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plol r l. 300, admeasuring 500 square yards, Block A, in Sy. No- 135 part, situatec at Gowthami Nagar' Edulanagulapally village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, sangzr eddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c I )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma I be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere v ith the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 300, admeasuring 50 | square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Ed I anagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram [\,4andal, Sangareddy District, without foll rwing due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU' Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5: SMT. S. SRI\ /ANTHl, AGP FOR RE VENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL AE MINISTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMENI Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA Il :DDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALIT'/ The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3O569 of 2O2l THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Sri Puli Thirupathi Rao AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Special Chief Secretar5i to Government , Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & (5) others. ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri trslavath Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pieader for Revenue and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Stalding Counsel for Municipalities, appearing for the respondents. Perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent No.5 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner 1n a respect of petitioner's Plot No.300, Block A, tn iy.No.135 Part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagual ipally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandai, Sangareddy District for brevrty, "the subject property") and threatening to disposses; the petitioner from his plot, u,ithout issuing any notice and ri thout following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary. 3, Learned counsel for the petitioner furthr:. submits that, while admitting the matter, this Court passed intr rim order dated

26.11.2021 directing the official respondents not o interfere with the petitioner's possession over the subject pro )ert],, except in accordance with the procedure established by l;t r'- Hovvever, in spite of lapse of more than four years, the respo: lent authorities have not filed counter or vacate petition for denl.ir g the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. In ,, ew of the same, iearned counsel requested this Court to allow th,: Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to irr' erfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject f roperty without following due process of 1aw.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Go.. .rnment Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in : :ssession of the subject propert)', the respondents -"vill not ir.'erfere with the I \ 3 petitioner's possession over the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shal1 stand closed. SD/.T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASS TANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Special Chief Secretary to Govt, The Stale ofTelangana, Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. -

2. The Principal Secretary to Govt, The State of Telangana, IVA and UD Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 5. The Tahsiidar, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District. 6. The Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Tellapur, Sangareddy District. 7. One CC to Sri, ESLAVATH RAJU Advocate[OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

9. One CC to Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, SC for MunicipalitylOPucl '10.Two CC to The GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OU!

11.Two CD Copies TJ HIGH COURT DATED:1 711212025 ORDER WP.No.30569 of 2021 1i a..' ,? ' Jirl llli 3i - \, * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I \\ t, +