✦ High Court of India · 19 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,148 words

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled therewrth, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction declaring the actions of the Respondents No.4 and 5 in detaining the Petitioners, and coercing them to sign undertakings in relation to a civtl dispute as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violative of fundamental rights, and consequently direct the Respondents, particularly the Respondents No. 4 and 5 not to call, summon, detain, threaten, or in any manner interfere with the personal liberty of the Petitioners in relation to the alleged monetary dispute, except in strict compliance with the provisions of law and not to refrain from compelling the Petitioners to execute any undertakings, settlements, or payments in connection with the alleged dispute, which is purely civil in nature. lA NO: 1 OF 2O2s Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in trr,: circumstances stated in the affidavit filec in suppo,t of the petition, the High coul may be preased to direct the Responrients, particularly the Respondents t{. 4 and 5 not to call, summon, detain, threaten, or in any manner interfere wrth the personal liberty of the Petitioners in reration to the alreged monetary cr;pute. except in strict compliance with the provisions of raw and not to refra r from compeling the Petitioners to execute any undertakrngs, setflements, or [)a Tments in connection with the alleged dispute, which is purely civil in nature, F)errding disposal of the Main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SRIKANTH SUTARI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI M. SRINVIAS . AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: -- The Court made the following: ORDER . -:r&I"-" 'r 'r'HE HONOURAIILE SIII JUS'IICE N.V.SI{RAVAN KUMAR WI(I'I PE'l'l I'lON No.24425 of 2025 OI(I)UI{ I It'altl Ic;rlrrcd counsel Iol the pelitiouers ancl Sri.M.Srinivas, lcarner-1 Assislant (jovr.rnment P[ear:Ltr Ior I Iorne appearing for respondcnt Nos.I to 5 \\'iilr tht'ir' (()ns(.ut, this r!r'it P(,trti()l) is i,ciug taken up for clisposal at the admissi()n st.r11c i tsr:lf

2. Ihis u rit pctitic,rr has lrcon Irlt:d se.eking the fo[[owing przryor:- rrglli: tt!tl .'Io itlnn'ilit ttcttttt,, rr/ /i,i ii,".7,,,rr111 riL: l'!tt.,l tttrl !] itt tk,!rrililg tltr' !)tttltottr: tttld aarrt !)tl lrir';r, fu, qisti ttt!!lt'rtttl\ititl\ ttr rchtItott to a i tttl tir-lttrlt rt< illtgr.i. rirltii'rin! ti'!iltttLii 1t,ii-.,lit lit,tr, tritLl ,itlttit'1, L,l- Itttufu rttlrii (t)it5i,LlrLtnLly Llirct'l tltc llesyotnlt' is portictrlrrrl4 iitt' Iics/rolr['rtlq l,ltt.ttr titr! 5 rult lo call supnort tialtiti llrrartlt'tt, t)r i ny nttuut(t r l(rt'crt: tuillt llu' .Lursonal libci-ty ol'iitt' PaltlLtttu,rs in rL,lLrlrou 1i; !lr tillcgcd t)nnrtnrV dtsputc etcestt in stritt aotitpliitttt'( iL,iIl; !it: /rt,i,ts1()i]s oi i,ttL, nttrl tttl lo rc.[rtit, .l).,'ttt r t,,r/lrr'1//,i! il L, l)tliltLtttrrs /o (rrr-ir1i, p1:.t1 t.ntr!trttktttgs, settirntttit! or ltt,|ltnt'ui\ //r irriri;r'r-1rr:,ri .L t:i; titt tt!lectrl disytttlt it,!iclt is p ttity .. ,iI ttt

3. ljrit:l l.rr-Ls statt,cl ir Lhi.; r.'riI pctition art t]rat on 06.0ti.2025, rcslrot]L{eltt No.i, ou phorrc tall tlircctctl tlrc l)(.iiii()ncrs to appoar at (lovincla raolrct I)olicc St:rtion I lr,.,r'r,.r i Lc t', peLrtioners on l().Oii.2025, visitcd thc policc statiotl .l]d the resporrrlent No.5 tlrre.tt.,rt,rl tlxr pctitioner to pa), a sum of Rs.27,25,1)OO/- irr lespccr ()f cir ii tlisprutc. Ilrt: t'asc ol lhc pctiliont,rs is that the t'espcrnclent No.5, u'iih()Lri t',:uirt9. an., 11qrii1c, g1rpr1 ()f Lr)lrDiaint Ol- FIR, SUmmonccl thc petlfioners arrrl arc interferir-rg n'illr the civil .-lisputc. Aggrievecl by the sarne, Lhis n lit pctition is [iie,rl ,1. Lt.arncci Assistant (lovt,rnnrerrt Pleatlcr lor 'rrritc iiPP(,ilrinl,, Ior rcspondent Nos.1 to 5 piacr:cl orr rccorr'1 instructior.ts islr,,,1 tx. Sub-[nsLrt,ckrr of Policc, I)asra Policc St,rtitrn, Gor intlar.aopct \4anrl I N4trltriLr I)istr ict, '/. whereiu it is siakrrl that on otr ()8.202a, ot-re Nlirr,ala [ ], t. ;h l(r.cldr . ntatle a compltrint allellirrg that petitiont'r N. I harl takt:n lls l, ;rkhs tr.,r hinr [o process P.R.AustralLr, or-r assLrr(ltcr. th.rt hc l'ill r.r'trrln titr r.norrc,r il hL,failotl to provide thc sartrc. \ rrhcn thc Petitioncr No.l f.rilcd tt, 1.:.,166,55 I).1(.Austr'.ili:i and did nol retur rrecl the nrorrcr, sri.lvlilvala Halish lir,,rLlr lilc,r{ a corrrPlaint. 'fhcreaf tcr, rcs;-xrndcnt autlrorLtics nratle Cl) r.,rrtr\ . r r CI) ;rar,,c No.ill, SL.No.08 atrd t ntlorsr.tl thc Pt,1i1111r''",- Ul P1--i()l) trrr ( ,1 i11 r,rrlr, rcct,Ptior.r ackno\^,leLl {lcrncnt No.ML(,,/l'As-i\rll.(,i 0(1082i/(X)7i6. Ir . lur-tircr stat(.d that Crime N..176 o[ 2025 u.clrr scctio. -118(,1) .r lJharat i ,r \a1;arik suraksha Sanhita, 202i (l-r.rein aftct. rt.lt,r.rt'rl as 'BNS,c') \\'(r\ I t, -.r.,rr.rl a.rl 1.r. tltr, PurPose of ir.tvc.still.rtiotr tht.|1'1i111r,11'1. rr.ct.c rallctl trr ll-,. r. rlirr, st,ttirrrr

5. At this stagc, learlleLl (()lulscj for thc Pt,titior,,, su[]ntits tltirt the petitioncrs rnav Lre provirit.ti rr,ith a coprr oi l,lli \ .l'(r ot 1025 clatctl

16.08.2025 lor takins fu rtht-.r steps rrr lhe m:rlter .ur(] l)l.ir\ |iis C crrrrt to rlircct the rcspoirclcnt authoritics t. lur'rish a copl, ol Irlll l{, i7(r of 2025 clated

1.6.08.2075

6. Rccording thc sub|nissi,rns u.rirclt, br thc lt,arnctl .,,1r rscl .rppr.ari11g 611 either sidt:s, this rvrit petition is elisl:roserl of clirecting, rr:sP,nclent authorities to furnish a copv of I"lI{ No.l7(r.r 2025 darerl 1(r.Os.2025 . , ii c pctiti,.o.s. '" li a..::.$' I

7. Accorclinglr', this \^,riI pctitiorl disposcd of. Miscellancous applications, il arl, penclinll, shall stand clost'cl. No order as to costs SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN I A s TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Dr. B.R Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad' The Superintendent of Police, [/ulugu District, ttlyty-9,]' The Govindaraopet Police Station, Pasra [,4and al, lrl ulugu Districl A. Karunakar, The Sub-lnspector, Govindaraopet Police Station, Pasra IVlandal, Ivlulugu District, Telangana. One CC to SRl. SRIKANTH SUTARI Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOIr/E ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BIU GJP I t+ d HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 ORDER WP.No.24425 of 2025 \. 2 4 rEP 20fr DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ 1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments