✦ High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Aug 2025
Length
1,234 words

17. K.Srinivasulu S/o. Kistanna, Age 59 Years, Working as M.tr.O., MRC Hayathnagar, Ralga-reddy District .-+7 Az

18. 19

24. 25

26. o7 K.Florence S/o. Samson ;s" s;t;*", wo.i'ing as G'C'D'O' (G'H'M')' o?i"; ri D.E.o., warangal, warangal District' V.Venkatramudu S / o' PeddaVenkatarna' Age 52 Years, Working as G'H'M ' ZFHa V;p".u U/M, Mahabubnagar District' A.Laxman Naik S/o. Cheeq 1) Ase 58 vears, Working as M'E'O iuf'nC St Ranga h-''eddy District' "*"habad, Kurmaiah S/o' Narsimhulu, Age 55 Years, Working as G'H'IVI'' TFus duaipally, Nagarkurnool District' V.Kishan S/o. DulY,a A..lc 49 Years, Working as G'H'M'' zFHS Cuaur, Ranga ReddY District' H.Narsimha S/o. Maisaiah, ege 5t Years, fuorking as M E'O: (FlC)' ZFHS llmoor, Rar-rga Reddl' District' Ravinder S/o. Ramaiah, Ase 59 vears, Working as G H M'' TFHs Ir,i".t-r"pur' HanmakorLda District' t Raiagangaram S/o' Gangaram' ae! 5O y-""t", Working as G H'M'' ZFHs r"""putly, Nizamabad District' P.Chathru S/o. Saidulu, ;s; ja years, Working as M'tr'O !FAC)' TFns i*laepally, Suryapet District' Heerya S/o- Ramsingh, age SS Years, Working as M,tr Q,' rf'J #p"t.am, Ranga Reddy District' 7/ b) I c) d) )v ,o

28. M.Shankaraiah S/o. Raghupathaiah, Age 55 years, Working as G.H.M., ZPHS Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District AND I The State of Telangzrna, Rep. by its Principai Secretary to Government, School Education Departmcnt, : Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Telangana, Hyderabad. Petitioner ..... Respondents Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the tligh Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that a) dction of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioners for promotion to the post of Deputy trducational Officer / Gazetted Head lvlaster Grade-l in the existing vacancies, by considering the candidature of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and disr:riminatory violating Article 14 and 1 6 of the Constitution of the lndia. b) further declare that the Respondents shall forth with existing vacancies of Deputy E ducational Officer / Gazetted Head Master Grade-l , by promotion from the candidate working as Gazetted Head lvlaster Grade-ll/ Mandal Educational Officer. J) lhe Respondents shall consider the representation dated 28.07.2025 and prortote the petitioners as Deputy Educational Officer /Gazetted Head Master Grad3-l in the existing / available vacancies. I.ANO i1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circrrmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to fo(hwith consider and pass apcropriate orders on the representation dated 28.07 2025 of the Telangana St€ te Gazetted Head Masters Association and promote the petitioners as Deputy Educational officer / Gazetted Head Master Grade-|, pending disposal of the writ petition. 7/ l.A.NO:2 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 20.08.2025 submitted by the Petitioners and promote the Petitioners as Deputy Educational Officers / Gazetted Head Master Grade-|, in the existing / available vacancies in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR SERVICES -l The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER t 7 1, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA K.E,RTHIK W.P.No.24435 of 2025 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, this Writ Pe itron is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition is hled declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Deputy Educational Officl:r f Gazetted Head Master Grade-l in the existing vacancies as arbitran. and illega1.

3. Heard Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Sr.n,ices-l for the respondents and pcrused the record. t I

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made represenl ation to tl-re respondent No.2 on 28.7 .2025, ver-rtilating their grievar-rces, but so lirr no action has been taken by the respondent No.2. Therefore, petitioners seek indulgence of this Court to dircct the respondenL No.2 to consider the said represenration of the l)ctitioners. 2

5. Having regard to the facts and circumsta_nces of the case and without going into merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioners dated 28.7 .2025, after putting on notice to all the interested parties, if required, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiousll, as possible, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR secMYorncen To \ SA PVL

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, State of Felangana at Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Telangana, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Cqurt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:2810812025 ORDER WP.No.24435 of 2025 e'J o \ r E S I.q 15 (r( { 10 siP 2ffi D Sr.rCpf o DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments