High Court · 2025

nge.73 Years, Occ. Business R/o Yellareddyguda, srinagar colonY,

6. Pilli Satish Anand, S/o.Pilli Anand Rao, Aged 48 years, Occ. Business, FVo.H.No.8-3-293t82tN28, Plot No:28, Road No.S, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

7. Pilli Guru Prasad Anand, S/o.Pilli Anand Rao, Aged 44 R/o.H.No.8-3-2931821N28, Plot No.28, Road No.S, Jubi 500 033 years, Occ. Business, lee Hills, Hyderabad - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the officials from respondent No.4 police station in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner by threatening the petitioner to settle civil disputes with respondents No.5 to 7 under the threat of arrest and false cases, on behest of the respondent \os.S to 7, as illegal' arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 14,21 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently, direct the official respondents more lrarticularly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere with the life and liberty of the p,:titioner herein, on the behest of respondent Nos.5 to 7 herein, without following dtte procedure of law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,: rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (lourt may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents more particttlarly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere with the life and liberty of the pe.itioner herein, on the behest of respondent Nos-5 to 7 herein, without following due procedure of law, pending disposal of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI YEMMIGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4 : SRI M.SRINIVAS, ,qGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5to7: The Court made the following: ORDER ! ! I i i _t. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24283 of 2O25 ORDER Heard learned counsel {or the petitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking dre following prayer:- "to declare tht nction of the olficinls from respondent No.4 police station in interfering u,itlt tlr l{e and liberty of tlu petitioner by tlteatenrng tlr petitioner to settle cirtil disputes roith respondents Nos.5 fo / tuuler lhc Llrreot o.f arrest md fnlse cases, on behest of the respondent Nos.5 fo 7, as iLlegnl, arbitrary, unanstitutional and oiolation of Article 14, 21 of tlu Constitution of lndia, consequently, direct thc offaal respondctis more particularly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere totth the l{c and liberty of tlu petitiorcr herein, on the behest of resliotttlcirl Nos.5 b 7 here in, ruithout folloruing due procedure of hto."

3. Brief facts statc(i ih this writ pctition are that due to some civil dispute, petitioner's father i.e., responcient No.5 filed O.S.No.3861 of 2024 seeking l t) perpetual injunctioit .rgarns! pctitioncr anrl the same is pending ori the file of the XXII Junior Civil Judge, Citr. Civil Court at Hyderabad (herein after referred as Trial Court). I-hc casc of tire petitioner is that respondent No.5 lodged complaints on 15.07.2024 ancl 24.08.2024, alleging that the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 (brothers of petitioner) had trespassed into his residence and cornmittt,r{ ll-reft of some valuable documents. Further case of the petitioner is tliat the rosponclent Nos.6 and 7, with same set of allegations had loclgctl a corrrplaint bclorc thc lubilcc Hills Police Station against thc 2 petitioner. Thereafter, police officials are calling thr: petitioner to the police station and are harassing to settle the civil dispute wit]i respondent Nos.5 to 7. Aggrieved by the same, this writ perition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleacler for. Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 on instructions submits hat on complaint of respondent Nos.S to Z FIR No.851 of 2025 dated 1(; 0g.2025 was registered and the matter is under investigation.

5. Recording the submissions made by learnei counsel appearing on either side and since the FIR No.851 of 2025 dated 16.0ii.2025 is registered and the matter is pending for investigation, this Court rl .rcms it appropriate to dispobe of the writ petition with a direction to respo.(ient authorities to take up investigatiory strictly in accordance with la!v.

6. With the above direction, this writ pctLtron disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any penciing, shall stantl r.-losccl No order as to i I I I t i I t ! : costs. To ASS //TRUE COPY// SD/.B. REKHA RANI ANT REGISTRAR / itcnoru oFFrcER

1. The Principal Secretary, .State of rerangana, Home t)epartment, secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commiss (,nerate, Telangana. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of police, Rachakonda Oommissionerate, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

4. The Station House officer, L B Nagar porice Station, rangareddy District, Telangana.

5. one cc to SRI YEI/MTGANUR sorvA SRTNATH REt)Dy, Advocate. topuc] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. BSK YK HIGH COURT DATED:2010812025 -...,-. l\ '-\. or,\ ,:] 0 3 itr rnz,l / / 1,,,i l,-' \1, r-. ;2. \. ORDER WP.No.24283 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q COP(EA w-- {a' "

nge.73 Years, Occ. Business R/o Yellareddyguda, srinagar colonY,

6. Pilli Satish Anand, S/o.Pilli Anand Rao, Aged 48 years, Occ. Business, FVo.H.No.8-3-293t82tN28, Plot No:28, Road No.S, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

7. Pilli Guru Prasad Anand, S/o.Pilli Anand Rao, Aged 44 R/o.H.No.8-3-2931821N28, Plot No.28, Road No.S, Jubi 500 033 years, Occ. Business, lee Hills, Hyderabad - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the officials from respondent No.4 police station in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner by threatening the petitioner to settle civil disputes with respondents No.5 to 7 under the threat of arrest and false cases, on behest of the respondent \os.S to 7, as illegal' arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 14,21 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently, direct the official respondents more lrarticularly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere with the life and liberty of the p,:titioner herein, on the behest of respondent Nos.5 to 7 herein, without following dtte procedure of law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,: rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (lourt may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents more particttlarly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere with the life and liberty of the pe.itioner herein, on the behest of respondent Nos-5 to 7 herein, without following due procedure of law, pending disposal of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI YEMMIGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4 : SRI M.SRINIVAS, ,qGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5to7: The Court made the following: ORDER ! ! I i i _t. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24283 of 2O25 ORDER Heard learned counsel {or the petitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking dre following prayer:- "to declare tht nction of the olficinls from respondent No.4 police station in interfering u,itlt tlr l{e and liberty of tlu petitioner by tlteatenrng tlr petitioner to settle cirtil disputes roith respondents Nos.5 fo / tuuler lhc Llrreot o.f arrest md fnlse cases, on behest of the respondent Nos.5 fo 7, as iLlegnl, arbitrary, unanstitutional and oiolation of Article 14, 21 of tlu Constitution of lndia, consequently, direct thc offaal respondctis more particularly respondent No.4 herein not to interfere totth the l{c and liberty of tlu petitiorcr herein, on the behest of resliotttlcirl Nos.5 b 7 here in, ruithout folloruing due procedure of hto."

3. Brief facts statc(i ih this writ pctition are that due to some civil dispute, petitioner's father i.e., responcient No.5 filed O.S.No.3861 of 2024 seeking l t) perpetual injunctioit .rgarns! pctitioncr anrl the same is pending ori the file of the XXII Junior Civil Judge, Citr. Civil Court at Hyderabad (herein after referred as Trial Court). I-hc casc of tire petitioner is that respondent No.5 lodged complaints on 15.07.2024 ancl 24.08.2024, alleging that the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 (brothers of petitioner) had trespassed into his residence and cornmittt,r{ ll-reft of some valuable documents. Further case of the petitioner is tliat the rosponclent Nos.6 and 7, with same set of allegations had loclgctl a corrrplaint bclorc thc lubilcc Hills Police Station against thc 2 petitioner. Thereafter, police officials are calling thr: petitioner to the police station and are harassing to settle the civil dispute wit]i respondent Nos.5 to 7. Aggrieved by the same, this writ perition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleacler for. Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 on instructions submits hat on complaint of respondent Nos.S to Z FIR No.851 of 2025 dated 1(; 0g.2025 was registered and the matter is under investigation.

5. Recording the submissions made by learnei counsel appearing on either side and since the FIR No.851 of 2025 dated 16.0ii.2025 is registered and the matter is pending for investigation, this Court rl .rcms it appropriate to dispobe of the writ petition with a direction to respo.(ient authorities to take up investigatiory strictly in accordance with la!v.

6. With the above direction, this writ pctLtron disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any penciing, shall stantl r.-losccl No order as to i I I I t i I t ! : costs. To ASS //TRUE COPY// SD/.B. REKHA RANI ANT REGISTRAR / itcnoru oFFrcER

1. The Principal Secretary, .State of rerangana, Home t)epartment, secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commiss (,nerate, Telangana. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of police, Rachakonda Oommissionerate, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

4. The Station House officer, L B Nagar porice Station, rangareddy District, Telangana.

5. one cc to SRI YEI/MTGANUR sorvA SRTNATH REt)Dy, Advocate. topuc] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. BSK YK HIGH COURT DATED:2010812025 -...,-. l\ '-\. or,\ ,:] 0 3 itr rnz,l / / 1,,,i l,-' \1, r-. ;2. \. ORDER WP.No.24283 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q COP(EA w-- {a' "