High Court · 2025

circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No' 4 in not receiving the written complaint filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 16, 19,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondent No. 4 to receive the written complaint filed by the petitioner and to register the FIR and investigate into the matter by protecting petitioner's life from the culprits' F':'rr' tt- IA NO: 10F 2025 Petition under section .r 5.1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to receive the written coiptaint fired by the petitioner and to register the FlR, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner : SRt VENKATA RAGHU MANNEPALLT Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER - IF:ffiF1r ,' :,-i( / x.,/ -r/ I : HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.2 5L48 of2O25 ORDER: This writ petition has been hled to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not receiving the written complaint filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and seeking consequential direction to receive the written complaint and to register FIR and investigate into the matter.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage'

3. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner is native of Piduguralla, Andhra Pradesh who has migrated to Hayathnagar, Hyderabad for the purpose of employment' On It.O2.2O25, petitioner approached Piduguralla Police Station' Pa,lnadu District and submitted a written complaint for taking actiqg against his wife who is having connections with Telangala Supari Gang and blackmailing him to pay Rs'5,O00/- ', ii2i:. every day or to give divorce b1z paying Rs.4,00,00,000/_. The :1 petitioner again approached respondent No.4 and informed the same, who suggested to approach Andhra pradesh police and that respondent No.4 is investigating about the Supari Gang and checking C.C Camera footages ald sorrie suspected persons are being watched. The petitioner submits that he is facing threat from the said gang. In this connection, he approached higher ofhcers and explajned his problem and respondent No.4 assured that he woulci catch the said gang and promised to protect his life. It is further submitted that a rvritten complaint has already been filed before the Andhra pradesh police a,d the same has been informed to respondent No.4 and the peititioner being a settler and migrated from Andhra pradesh to Ranga Reddy District which is -,r,ithin the jurisdiction of respondent No.4, as such on IO.O8.2O2S, petitioner approached respondent No.4 and filed a complaint but the salne was refused on the ground that the petitioner rras arready rnacie a lvritten complaint on 77.O2.2O25 before ,Andhra pradesh police. Since no action is forthcoming, the present Writ petition is filed. ( I I 1 I I , I ; i I ::3:: 4,TheSub-lnspectorofPolice,HayathnagarPolice Station has placed a copy of instructions through leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Home stating that as per the station records, respondent No'4 did not receive the complaint alleged to have been lodged by the petitioner' Now' if the petitioner approaches respondent No'4 at any point of time along with the complaint' respondent No'4 will act upon the same and initiate action in accordance to law' I

5. After arguing for some time' learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he would make a fresh complaint before respondent No'4 and prayed this court to pass approPriate order to that effect'

6. Recording the submissions made by learned cor-rnsel on disposed of directing the either side, this Writ Petition petitioner to approach respondent No'4 and file a fresh complaint, thereafter respondent No'4 shall consider the same strictlY as Per the Procedure and take aPProPriate action 1S contemPlated under law' -\ ,-1

7. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed :i4ii of. Miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA STANT REGISTRAR { SECTION OFFICER The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Dr.B. R.Ambedkar, Telangana State, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda police Commissionerate, Office at Sainikpuri, Neredmet, Medchat Malkajgiri District, Telangana State. The Director General of Police, Andhra pradesh State, Office at By-pass Road, Tadepalli, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda potice Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy Distiict, Telangana State. One CC to SRI VENKATA RAGHU IVANNEPALL|, Advocate. tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies. To, 1 2 3 4

5. b.

7. BSK LS €A i I i i I i i l l l i HIGH COURT DATED:26 tOgt2OZs I -.-j:.:-:::\- . r1: r i'E s.1i .: ': 03 sEPzffi \:,. '\. ORDER WP.No.2S14B of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Ot YIL ) n L