The High Court · 2025

6. Srikanth Sahoo, S/o Dhanunjaya Sahoo Aged about 45 years, Occ Business R/o.HNo. 6-68 Bollaram Medak , Medak District ... Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 6 AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor High court of Telangana at Hyderabad. ...ResPondent

2. D.Nagaraja Sarma, S/o D. V.Narayana Sarma Aged 66 years, occ, Retired - Empt6yeei R/o H.No.4-32-1494123iP. Kakatiya Nagar colony, Phase ll, Kukatpally Hyderabad ...RespondenUDefacto complainant Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the FIR in crime No.759 oI 2024 dated 1 1-9-2024 on the file of F.S. Dundigal, Cyberabad registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\/emorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay' of ail and further proceedings incruding Srrest of the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6 in crime No.759 or zoz+ dated 1-1-9-2024 on the file of P.s. Dundigal, cyberabad pending disposal of the criminar petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: D.Nagaraja Sarma, S/o D. V.Narayana Sarma Aged 66 years, occ, Retired Employee R/o H No.4-32-14s4t23ip. Kakatiya NEgirio'l,mt, hh;$.ii' -- Kukatpally Hyderabad ...Petitioner/2'd RespondenUcomplainant in LA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND

1. Mandala Naresh, s/o Ramaswamy Aged about 34 years, occ. Business R/o Plot No. 45-1 I\/ailampet , Bachupdily [4edchat_Matkajg;i Di"trict --- Z. Vqlentl,i Shiva, S/o Bidhya Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 7-105, church Basthi, rDA'Boraram Viilage, Aie eoitaram so M"oirbliii.i. 3. Chebrolu Poornima, Wlg .Clrgb1o-tu Srinivas Aged about 39 years Occ. House wife. R/o.F-tal No 6!, pfoJ No.43. Bhanu Niiayim nouo ifo.s, rrajifrrp"t, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 4. Kothi Anjaneyuru, S/o Kothi Bara Kotaiah Aged about 41 years, occ.Business R/o Plot No.1'19. H.No 3-7-62, RajivgandhinigirNizimpel-noa'0, i;n-g;"r;ily District. 5. Geethanjali .Sahoo. Wo Srikanth. Qafloo Age_d about 40 years, Occ. House 6. srikanth sahoo, s/o Dhanunjaya Sar.roo fged about 45 years, occ. Business wife R/o H.No. 6-68 Bollaram Medak , Meda-k Distnct. R/o.HNo. 6-68 Bollaram Med'a( , Medak Di;trict ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2o2s 7. The State of Telanoana, rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. ...Respondent No.1 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 Petition under section 359(6) Riw.s2B of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the compromise permission petition, th; H"igh ctrii ,rv be pleased to permit the. petitioner/2nd respondent/Defacto .o-rpLinrrt to compound the offence Registered against the Respondents/petitionerslRccuseo N.os.1-to^6^registered against them in crime No. 7's9 of 2oz4 rl-s-ziz.l-ii tne file of P.S. Dundiga, Cyberabad and quash the proceedings against the Respondents/petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 herein in irl.p.No.i01e5 Jiio)s - l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) R/w. 528 ot BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the compromise Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise in Crl.P.No.10485 of 2025 and quash the proceedings in Crime No.759 of 2024, dl:11-9-2024 on the file of P.S. Dundigal, Cyberabad registered against the petitioners/A'1 to ,46. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A.MUKUND RAJ GOKUL, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Chintala Vignesh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER -/ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITI ON No.1 0485 of 2025 COMMON ORDE R: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 52g of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitionersiaccused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime No.759 of 2024, on the file of Dundigal Police Station, Cyberabad, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 4OS, 46g read with 34 of lPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondent No.2/defacto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences. 3 The learned Additional Public prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition.

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to setfle the matter by appearing along with th\ resOective counsel before the High Court Legal Services 2 ETD,] C -P.No.1O4AS 2025 \-" r - Committee for the State of Telangana ylde orders dated 19.0g.2025 \ passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect. 5, Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted report dated 03.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. In view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 oL2O25 are allowed, Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.759 of 2024, on the file of Dundigal Police Station, Cyberabad, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, registered against the petitioners, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of same before the Registry ETD.J Crl-P.No-1U85 2025 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// AssrsrAN?%-Eud,SYRXA G. SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 The V',r Metroporitan Magistrate cyberabad at fVredchar Medchar District. The Station House Officer, Dundigal police Station, Cyberabad. Two CCs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri A.Mukund Raj Gokul, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Chintala Vignesh Kumar,Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with Joint Memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs .10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri A Mukund Raj Gokur. counser for the petitioner as directed by the Hon,bre Court vide order dated 10 Og.2O2S as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, sainik werfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Terangana state Legar service Authority Hyderabad and fired Memo as proof of compliance USR No..103962 of 2025. c NVB/kam i il E SEP 2025 - ,-.,'-ra -;t-t 'v \ HIGH COURT DATED:1 010912025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.10485 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND I.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 il q { k IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HI'DERABAD crr].No. )oqT: or2o25 BeNveen: D.Nagaraja Sarma S/o D' V'Narayana Sarma "t*[1i]u-ffi#[*,Lilx,HKug* .olo'v petitioner/ i,rr"*.ir,KukarpallyHyderabad' 2*R.spond.nt/i;;1rfu, 1 2 .l 4 5 And Mandala Naresh S/o RamaswamY o".ili"ri:+ Years' occ; Btrsiness ill'" irr, N". +5-1 Mallampet ' Medchal-Malkaj giri district' Bachupally . 'ifhge, Aie Boltaram SO Mahanthi Shiva S/o BidhYa a*falu"r, 34 Years' occ; Business ill'" irlN"lz-ros' church Basthi' IDA 'sthtr* Medak district' Chebrolu Poomima W/o C.hebrolu Srinivas d*l,ri*: :ififi $::;l%"'#Ri,",**, ... . N;. ;, Mal lampet' tr'ltott'ut-uutttaj giri district' "i# Kothi Anianeyulu S/o Kothi Bala Kotaiah t*t':',"*::iJrl1T,o%"!,-|#li'uliueu''ot'inue* NizamPet Raod' R'R'District' Geethanjati Sahoo W/o Srikanth Sahoo ;;;;;;r,40 Years, occ; House wire fi/"" u i,"t'o-08 Boliu'u* Nledak ' Medak district' 6 7 Srikanth Sahoo S/o Dianunjaya Sahoo Agcd 45 1ears, Occ: Business R/o H.N,r. 6-6g Bollaram Medak, Medak clistricr. -ahour .......Respondents/ Petitioners/ Accused Nos.l to 6 Ihe State of Telansana- Rep. by iri public Fror..uto. Iiql 9"r,1 of for the State of Tetangana, At H1'derabad. .. Respondent JOINTMEMO It is submitted that on the interventiod/ofthe well rvishers friends and relatives anil caste elders the disputes between ,n.n, *.r;;;;; sorted out. The elders advise the petitioner/ 2nd respondent/.not to prosecute the criminal case iegistered against the Respondent/ petitioners/ Accused I to 6 and for the betterment of their relationship as the petitioners /accused I to 6 and defacto complainant are family relatives and accordingly, the petition0r/R2 is agteed not to prosecute the criminal case registered against Respondents/petitioners/Accuse Nos. I to 6. The criminal proceedings in Crime No. 759 of 2024 l l_9_ 2024 on rhe flle oi-Ir.S. Dundigal, Cyberabad the intercsr ofjr-rstice. It is submined that the petitionerZd respondent have amicably settled the dispute ar the interveniion of erders and well rvishers and friends and caste elders the matter has been compromised between them, Hence the both parlies came to compromise in the above Crl.p.No. of 2025 against Crime No. 759 of 2024 11_9_2024 on the file of p.S. Dundigal, Cyberabad registered against.the respondents *;,], ^..r..0 & to 6 and both thc parties have no claims or rights agaillst eagh other in luture , pcoP^i\19 (g, nssnrrfloru) &L'NBBGsD ( x' sn tltP) l/ f.-\c.{"ob o. "(do) I ?, ?oov"i.na (irr V, Y.'f)'$anz'1u1u {, hitq (q,eeta'0,''rrnu 6' t Svi Ro-nt'a--f'".l"oo Respondehts/Petitioners/Accused Nos' 1-6 Co Re Accused Nos.1-6 etitloner Defacto comPlainant No.2 Counsel for Ibti'ti'ene# ResPo\dent No' 2 Defacto comPlainant