Kethavath Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos-4 and 5 in non-considering the Application for Appeals on Demarcation through vide Nos.A0Do225oOO72774 and A0D022500072779, dated. 2110612025 and non-conducting the survey and demarcation on the agriculture land of the Petitioner to an extent of land Ac.0.20 Gts in survey No.396lAal1, an extent of land Ac.0.10 Gts in Survey No.396/Ee/E/1 , an extent of land Ac 0'15 Gts in survey No.396 lAet1, an extent of land Ac.0.06 Gts in survey No.396ilu/5/2 and an extent of land Ac.0.07 Gts in survey No.397 tAl2, an extent of land Ac.0-05 Gts in Survey No.416/Am t1t2, an extent of land Ac.0.09 Gts in Survey No.416/Au/E/'1 , an extent of land Ac.0.02 Gts in Survey No.417lluu/E/1 , an extent of land Ac.O 01 Gts in survey No.418lAelEt1, an extent of land Ac.0.13 Gts in Survey No.419/Am/El1 , an extent of land Ac..l .25 Gts in Survey No.419i0/1 , an extent of land Ac.0.07 Gts in Survey No.449 lKalEtl, an extent of land Ac.0.15 Gts in Survey No.449tGial2ll totaling to an extent of land Ac.4.15 Gts, which is situated at Kadthal village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and non-initiating to fix the boundaries to the petitioner land is illegal arbitrary, u nco n stitutiona I and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and also violarion of principles of Natural Justice and consequenfly direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to consider the onrine Apprication for Appeals on Demarcation through vide Nos.AoDoz25ooo72774 and AoD0225ooo7277g, dated. 2110612025 and to conduct the survey and demarcation and fix the boundaries to the aEriculture tand of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.4.15 Gts in Survey Nos. 396/Aa/1 , 396lEelEt ,396/Ae/1 , 396tLut,t2, 3g7lAl2, 416lAmt1t2, 416lAulEl1, 417lLuulEl1 , 418tAelEt1, 419lAmtEl1 , 41glol1, 449lKalEt1 . 449lchal2l1, which is situated at Kadthal Village and Mandat, Ranga Reddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Gourt may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the online Application for Appeals on Demarcation through vide Nos.AoD0225 00072774 and AoD022500072779, dated. 21to6r2o2s and to conducr the survey and demarcation and fix the boundaries to the agriculture land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.4.15 Gts in survey Nos. 396/Aa/1 , 396/Ee/E/, 396/Ae/1 ,396tLulsl2, 3971N2, 416lAml112, 416tAutEt1, 417tLuutEt1, 41BtAetEt1, 419tAmtEt1, 4191O11, 449lKalEl1, 449lchal2l1, which is situated at Kadthat viltage and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RApOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER /.. THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAKSTIMAN WRIT PETITION No.24388 of 2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents

2. The Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.4.l5 guntas in different survey numbers of Kadthal Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed copies of the latest passbook and title deeds. He has submitted two online applications bearing Nos. AOD022500072774 and AOD022500012179, dated 21.06.2025, to respondent No.5 with a request to conduct survey and demarcate the subject property by frxing boundaries. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online applications, respondent No.5 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction ofrespondent No.5, the present writ petition is filed.

3. A perusal of the said online applications submitted by the \etitioner would reveal that he has mentioned service name as 2 'Appeals on Demarcation', and at the top of the said applications, it is stated as 'Appeals on Demarcation Receipt'. There is no order to prefer an apoeal by the petitioner. In fact, the petitioner is seeking to conduct survey and demarcate the subject property by fixing boundaries. Therefore, he cannot submit the afbresaid online applications under the service name 'Appeals on Demarcation' Instead, he has to submit F-Line application to respondent No.5, along with all the relevant documents with a specific request to conduct sun/e)r and demarcate the subject property by fixing boundaries. On receipt of the said F-Line applicatirtn, 1s.r.ra.., No.5 will consider the same in accordance with law. 4 In the light of the aforesaid discussion, the rvrit petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to submit F-Line application to respondent No.5, along with all the relevant document, with a specific request to conduct a suruey and demarcate the subject property by fixing boundaries. On receipt of the said application, respondent No.5 shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. J As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. s'ot- e. nerue nnut ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 The Tahsildar, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist n One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR' Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies BSR PVL M, HIGH COURT / DATED: 1910812025 ..::1-r .z:t,- i i. - o^ I l. 2 4 StP 2025 , D,- -'i't41 t' --) -,,' , ' 't- ORDER WP.No.24388 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS C)_\ 1(v' \7'