The High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRITPETITI ON NO: 2423 20F 2025 Between: hiJHRll"y3Jlf3:3i,#?,3J,liB}"ffi .,73;jj,ilffff AND 't. The State of Tel iogc;unemoroyee, ...PETITIONER iii*ffi*:.t;,*H#++#ffi d$###";-- ; +f"fr:rliT3?:,"commissioner , +i*rr*ilq,Oo.#L[ioun"r",oJ,"". : ilirl:?lli,i"ri13"u "Hff 'fl i"n[i411','0?;Ij{3,y,iili"B;,*?ii#:H#,:J"?'i,i"3:f; or Porice, Uppar Division, Rachakonda Uppar women porice station, orricer, Jawaharnasar porice station, Rachakonda -{i; District "rfl,:ff 'us?;H3#?3,sx,"f y:i"#,T#:J.",:'il"?",:#t,,ff .rqgu%if #gf,; 'o filll*#rt:i1?:li.:i"^$_saia[ Ased about,24 years, occ Business, R/o " _,,Karesnwara cotony, Jawaharnagar,, rrrreocll_ilril,r.r.r,aisiri Dishict ,I ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus' decraring the action of the Respondent No. 6 and 7 in interfering into the matrimonial disputes and calling the petitioner to the police stations and threatening to give the divorce to the Respondent No.8 and also threatening to pay Rs 20'00'000/- as Compensation without having any i,,oo'o'""'^o :n1'-'';;:,[{ll":i :IiT"i[.", *J:ffi"'"J"]il :": threatening to settle the dlspure.ut'_l^, ^-^ .,,","tion of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of highly illegal' arbitrary' unconstitutional and violatio the Constitution of lndia '"i "t* violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently Oi'""t tn" nespondent No 6 and 7 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peacefut life and liberty and not to interfere into his matrimonial Respondent No 8 to 10 on the name of detaining him in the Police Station *nnou, following the due process of law' IA NO: 10F2025 disputesandnottothreatenthePetitionertopayRs20'00'000/-tothe Petition under Section the affidavit filed in suPPort direct the ResPondent No 6 life and libertY and not to threaten the Petitioner to Pa the name of detaining him in of law 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to and 7 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful interfere into his matrimonial disputes and not to y Rs.20,00,000i- to the Respondent No B to 10 on the Police Station without following the due process Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1to7: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 8to10:- The Court made the following: ORDER t, -/ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR W.P. No. 2 4232 of 2o.25 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government pleader for Home and with their consent this writ petition is disposed of at the threshold.

2. This writ petition is filed que stioning the action of the respondents No.6 and 7, Station House Officers, Uppal Women police Station and Jawaharnagar police Station, respectively, in interfering into the matrirnonial disputes and calling the pctitioner to the police Stations and threatening to give clivorce to the respondent No.g and also threatening to pay Rs.20,o0,000/- as compensation without having any jurisdiction and rights and without following the due process r_rf law and threatening to settle the dispute bctween the petitioner and respondcnt No.g with a consequential prayer to direct the responclents No.6 and 7 not to interfere into the petitioner,s peaceful life and liberty, petitioner firecr the present writ petition.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.g is the vr.ife of pctitioner and their marriagc was performed on 09. 12.2023 as per the t{indu Customs and Tiaditjons at ECIL, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad before the elders and well wishcrs. lt is submitted by the petitioner that earlier to the marriage he went to USA in the year 2O2l for tlie purpose of Higher Edttcation and after completion of his education, he is doing job in USA. While so, Lhe responclent, No.g was introduced 2 by u,ay of Tclugu Matrimony and got married' After marrtage' the respondent No'8 and the petitioner lived togcther under one rool for a period of 20 days and thereafter' the peti[ioner returned to USA for continuing his job Subsequently' the respondenL No 8 has also went Lo the USA zrnd siarted residing at USA frorn November' 2024 to July, 2025. Tl'rereafter, some matrimonial disputes arose betwcen the the respondent No.8 and due to various reasons' thc respondent No.8 returnecl to India and staying petitioner and petitioncr and separately. [t is furl he r submitted that the respondents No.S to 10 lodged a 4. complaint against the petitioner before the respondents No 6 ancl 7' who are calling to the Police Stations and thrcatening with drre consequences and also detaining the petitioner in the Police Stations without having any jurisdiction and without follo'-r.ing due process of law. Hence, the petitioncr filed the present writ petition'

5. On behalf of the ofhcial respondents No 1 to 7, the learned Assis[ant Government Pleader for Home, placed a copy of the written instructions arnd bascd on which, it is submitted that the respondent No.S had lodged a complaint on 11.O8.2O25 to the respondent No'6 stating that she is subjected to dowry harassment and requested to rake necessary action against her husband and in-iaws. since the dispute is relating to matrimoniai affair, the respondent No.6 made GD entry and addressed a letter dated 1 1.og.2025 to the counseror, Barosa CDtrW F.amily Counselling Center, at beside I(ushaiguda police -) ounseling ssue and S tation, Rachakonda Commissionerate to provide counseling to the complainant and her husband. On 16.09.2025 the complainant came to the respondent No.6 Police Station and informed that the counseling center called her husbancl for the purpose of c but her husband did not respond to the said phone call wanted to place the matter before the elders and resolve the i requested not to take any action on her complaint dated r 1 and hence, kept the matter on hold. 6. Eventually, the learned Assistant Government pleacler for Home would submit that before taking any action against the petitioner, the respondents' authority will follow the due process of law for which, the learned counsel for the petitioner says no objection. 7 and she Irr that view of thc matter, recordin g the submissions made by the Iearnecl counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents No.6 and 7 to follow due process of iaw before tnttiating any further action against the pedtioner. There shall be no order as to costs. .o8.2025 As a sequel, miscellaneous shall stand closed. applications, if any pending, To, //TRUE COPYII SD/-U. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR &S ECTION OFFICER I ] i1,: ElUfSSecretarY, 3li:B[h'l::S3t"T3!"JJ,:[:hIfl 3[335331,1h1]xi"T3[13 Home Department, secretariat, secretariat Buirdinss, l \ 7

4. q

7. B. 9. '10 BM LS The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Malkajgiri Zone, Rachakonda Com missionerate. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Uppal Division, Rachakonda Commissionerate The Station House Officer, Uppal Women Police Station, .Rachpkonda.Commissionerate The Station House Officer, Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 \ ORDER WP.No.24232 of 2025 I t ,t-e ,q 25 [u$ 2$?5 ,i:.''-1,. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS &