The High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT P ETITIONNO :24246 OF 2025 Between: f:[lJlJ!3[?',]r,*,:1"u"?a';,uj,A?:$*'#g3o,,"B,,li,Bf"jnricurture, H No 2- AND .....PETITIONER .- 1 . The State of Telangana, t D ep a rtm e n t, s ecrei",iJd it :f., 9, SJ",.;S,:p,Sl .r?UE f; f:e n u e --

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukuru Division, Ranga Reddy District._ 4. TheAssistant Director of Survey and Land, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy 5. The Tahsildar, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict. _ .....RESPONDENTS '- Petition Under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in non-considering the Application for Appeals on Demarcation through vide Nos.A0D02250Oo.frn and A0D022S0 {OtZttO, O,^t"d. ,r.0U.r026 and non_ conducting the survey and demarcation on rha ^^.i^,ij,,. on the ag;ieulture land of the petitioner to an extent of land Ac.0.20 Gts in Survey N" 3e6/E"/:r?s,',':l,l;'::'i:l? i":Jl"J, :ll1: Xli . No 396/Ae/2, an extent of rand Ac.0.06 c(in sr*"y No.396M/5/1, 5-n extent of rand Ac 0 07 Gts in Survey No-397rN1, an extent of rand Ac.o.os Gt{ in survey "emarcation i No.416/Amfi-n, an extent of land Ac 010 Gts in Survey N o'ql{nu?tz' an'extent of land Ac.0.01 Gts in Survey No'417lLulEl2' an extent of land Ac 0 01 Gts in - Survey No.418/ AelEI2' an extent of land Ac 0'12 Gts in Survey No 419/Am/E/2' - an extent of land Ac 1 '25 Gts in Survey No 419/0/2' an extent of land Ac 0 08 Gts in Survey No.44 glKalEl2' an extent of land Ac-0 15 Gts in Survey No.449/Gha/1/1 ' totaling to an extent of land Ac 4 15 Gts' which is situated at Kadthal Village and Mandal' Ranga Reddy District and non-initiating to fix the boundaries to the petitioner rand is ilegar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos' 4 and 5 to consider the Onlinelpplication for pOeals on Demarcation through vide Nos.A0D022500072773 and A0D0225060ntto', dated 21 06'2025 and to conduct the survey and demarcation and fix the boundaries to the a9ri::ll::e ::9 of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac 415 Gts' Survey Nos 396/Aa/2' 396/Ee/E/z' 3961Aet2,396/Lu/5/1 , 3g7tN1,416lAml1/t1', 416tAulEt2', 417lLutEtz' 418lAelEl}' / 419tAmlEt2, 41gtlt2' 44glKatEt{ 449tGhal111' which is situated at Kadthal Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District t.A.NO:1 oF 2025 PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos 4 & 5 to consider the Online Application for Appeals on Demarcation through vide Nos 'AOD02250 OO72773 and A0D02250OO7277O' dated. 21.06.2025 and to conduct the survey and demarcation and fix the boundaries to the agriculture land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac 4 15 Gts' Survey Nos. 3gVtAalz, 3s6tEelEt2' 396tAel2' 396/Lu/5/1' 3g7tN1 ' 416lAml111' 416lAulEt2, 417lLulEl'., 418lAetEt2' 419tAmlEl1' 419tot2' 449lKalEl2' 44gtchat1l1, which is situated at Kadthal Village and Mandal' Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR '- Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L'RAVINDER' AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following ORDER / HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITIONNo .24246 of2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Assignment. - 2 ' The petitioner is craiming that he is the absorute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.O.20 gts in Sy.No.396/AAl2, Ac.o.1O gts in Sy.No.396/EE/E/2, Ac.0.15 gts in Sy.No.396/A/2, Ac.0.O6 gt in Sy.No.396/LU /5/1, Ac.O.O7 gts in sy.No. 3g7 / A/ 1, Ac.o.o5 gt in Sy.No.416/Am/1/I, Ac.0.1O gts in Sy.No. +16/O/E/2, Ac.0.01 Ct in Sy.No.417lLU/E/2, Ac.O.O1 gt in Sy.No.418/AA/E/2, Ac.O.12 gts in Sy.No.4t g/Am/E/2, Ac. 1.25 gts in Sy.No.aD/O/2, Ac.O.O8 gts in Sy.No.449lKA/E/2, Ac.O.tS gts in Sy.No.449/cha/t/ I total admeasuring Acs.4.15 gts, situated in Kadthal Village and Maldal, Kandukur Division, Ranga Reddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed latest pattadar pass books and title deeds. He has submitted two F_line applications vide Transaction ID Nos.TTAODO22SOOOZ2ZZ0 and KL,J W .P No.24246 ot 2025 ;n il,, 2 Transaction ID No.TTAODO225OOO72773, dated 2l .Cl6.2025 with the 4th respondent with a request to conduct survey. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said F-line applications, the 4th respondent did not act upon the same' Aggrieved by the inaction of the 4ft respondent, petitioner filed the present writ petition'

3. A perusal of the F-line applications submitted by the petitioner would revea-l that the petitioner has mentioned service narne as 'appeal on demarcation'' Even the receipt is shown as Appeals on Demarcation Receipt'' There is no order to prefer al appeal. The grievance of the petitioner is conduct of survey and demarcation of the aJoresaid property by fixing boundaries by the 5th respondent' But he has not submitted any F-line application to the 5th respondent with a request to conduct survey and demarcate the aforesaid- propert5r by fixing boundaries' Therefore, he cannot fiIe the present writ petition alleging non consideration of the a-foresaid F-line applications submitted by him, which are Appeats on demarcation' I KL,J W.P.No.24246 of 2O2S J

4. In the light of the same, this Writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to submit F_line application to the 5th respondent along with arl the releva,t documents with a specific request to conduct survey and demarcate the said property by fixing boundaries. On filing such application, the 5ft respondent shall consider the same, conduct survey within 45 working days from the date of receipt of the sajd F-line application. If the 5u, respondent is not inclined to accept the request of the petitioner, he shall pass a reasoned order specifying the reasons and communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioner herein. As a sequel, the miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand dismissed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT R GISTRAR SE OFFICER Secretariai, State of Talangana at Hyderabad 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, 2. The Districi Collector, Ran6a Reddy, Ranga Reddy District' 5. ff," A",j""re Divisional Ortcer, Kahdukuru Division, Ranga Reddy District. +. fti" nrist"nt Director of Survey and Land, v-Anock Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Tahsildar, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' O. f*o CC. i" OP FOR ASSIGNMENT, High Cou( for the State of Telangana at z. Oire CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies Hvderabad. [OUT] \il. I To SA ) HIGH COURT DATED:1 810812025 ORDER WP.No.24246 ot 2025 /:. iL ri l--- s f4; ( / !:- ,) I .: 01 sEP 2025 O1' qt,--,'),- \::-=-i:/ l/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t\ 9A o\ 1