The High Court · 2025

...Respondent NO.2/De-facto Complainant Petition under Section sJa gt^eruss praying that in the circumstances stated rn the rvremorandum of Grounds or criminar'peiiiioin, iil"'Hign court may be preased to quash the proceedinos against the petitioneill nl.r"uo Nos. 1 to 5 in crime No1184 0f 2024 0r Fs -veocnat. aateo-tirlio1i."^d the cc if anv arising therefrom and pendinq on the fire of the rX eoi,t,-rr Judiciar Magistrate of First Class, A/edchal Matkajgiri District, at Medchal l.A.Nos 3 and 4 ot 2025 l.A. NO:3 o F 2025 BETWEE N: Sulochana @ Housewife, R/o Yerva Sulochana, Wo Sathi Reddy, Aged 59 years, Occ. 10-349/3 pVN Corony, Matkajsiri UvoLi"oJj" "" ,= , .. .Petitioner/Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol Z02S AND , -E;;:,"ii"], . esea oz y;lls o". F"j:l:j:1gy g G.anupa sneha, wo yerva Rajashekhar Reddv. D/o uanupa Laxmareddv, Aged abour 29 years. o.. prl,trii"v,rJ.ii,il.lri!. D umpa tapa [y Duoni r vianoal, M"dri';;i;";i!nns, nu _. so2 I 08 presenty residing at U S.A.. Rep. by her GpA ff oiO"r _'.rrnrpa Laxmareddv. S/o Ganupa Rajaram R".d.ov, Dumpatapaily. Dubbak UanOar "rrleOarbiJa"ilf"Lrgana o]dl, 2 Ganupa Laxmareddv S/o Ganupa na1a namreOOy, Aged 62 years, Occ. liffi R/o 4-95, DLmpatapaly, oroor[nrr"iriireoar District, retangana - 3. Ganupa Mahender Reddy, S/o. Ganupa Chinna Malla Reddy, Aged 43 years, Occ Private Emplovee, R/o 4-95 Orrprfrpriiy. Dubbak Mandal, Medak Drstrict, Telangana .502.10g. 4. Ganupa Jeevan Reddv.^S/o Ganupa Rajaram Reddy. Aged 59 years, Occ. -i{;# 8:Iffi,{i"; fiil }.ff :J;.f -,y;. L",';;;;; i; v" r'r,d"'. eh isv, 5. Ganupa Jalaja. Wo. Ganupa Laxmareddy. Aged about 54 years, Occ. i;ffi:ffi #i,,oJ nt D'fu'L;;;rv'"6",iuolr.'=r,,'r,noar Medak District, r--r-", _ 5021 08. ...Respondent Nos.1 to S/petitioners in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND

6. The State of Telangana, Through P.S. Medchal, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. .... Respondent No.G/Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) rlw 528 ol BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner herein/ Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant to compound the offences against the Respondent Nos.l to 5 herern/ Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 5 by allowing the Criminal Petition by quashing the proceedings against the Accused Nos.'l to 5 in Crime No.1184 of 2024 of P.S. Medchal, dated 17.12.2024 and the C.C. if any arising therefrom and pending on the file of the lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal Malkajgiri District, at Medchal. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) r/w 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise entered into by the Petitioner herein/Defacto- Complainant and the Respondents NOs. 1 to 5 herein/Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 5 and quash the proceedings against the Accused Nos.'t to 5 in Crime No. 1184 of 2024 of P.S. Medchal and the C C. if any arising therefrom and pending on the file of the lX Additional Judicial [Vlagistrate of First Class, Medchal Malkajgiri District, at Medchal . This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Anuradha Cherukuri, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos. 3AN D 4 0F 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL P ETITION N o.10465 OF 202s COMMON ORD ER: This criminar petition is fired by the petitroners-accused Nos..r to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in crime No.11g4 of 2024 0n the fire of Medchar porice station, cyberabad, registered for the offences under Seclions 341 and 506 read with 34 of l.p.C. 2 Heard tVls. Anuradha Cherukurr. learned counsel for the petitioners, sri Jithender Rao Veerarnara, Iearned Additionar pubric Prosecutor for respondent No 1_State and Sri Nageshwar Rao pujari, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners_ accused Nos.1 to 5 as well as respondent No 2_de facio complainant that during pendency of the present criminal petition, the parties have compromrsed the matter and accordrngly, t.A Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to permtt respondent No 2 to compound the offences and to record the compromise.

4. Learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the said compromtse petition i l I I I I t: I D.J arl.P No.10465 o12025

5. Perused the affrdavit filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.No.3 of 2025, which discloses that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee, yide orders, dated 19.08.2025 and 26.09.2025, passed by this Court.

6. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Committee has identified the parties and submitted reports, dated 29 08 2025 and 14.10.2025, stating that the parties were identified and they have wllfully and without any coercion entered into compromrse.

7. ln view of the above, I A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.1184 of 2024 on the file of Medchal Police Station, Cyberabad, against the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 5 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 5 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High eourt Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of FTI) I ( rl l'\i 0l6i ol l()ti Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs 5,000r (Rupees Five Thousand onry) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPYII SD/- M.JAWAHAR REDDY I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / ,.,n r' ')' SECTION OFFICER

1. The lX Additionat Metropolitan Magistrate Medchal_Malkajgiri at Medchal 2. The Station House Offic 3 one cc to s,inn,,a'o;":ffix'J; ;r"J'"":,:ji["Jr3lo;"d 4. One CC to Sri Nageshwar Rao pujari, nOro.rt. 1O"eUC1 5 Tlg ccs to PUBLtc PROSECUToR il;;;; 6. Two CD Copies at Hyderabad fouTi I \J^ nrgn Loun tor the State of Telangana, \DK/PSI ,\long uith a col.l,r ol .Lrint l\,leruo ol.(.onrplornise HIGH COURT DATED: 2711012025 COMMON ORDER LA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.10465 of 2025 .*' . ;r r rF ,-.- " -' ;. ,B- f;I" ; i,r :,i 20ff * r) * r: i\ (. z o I ALLOWING THE CRLP AND tA.NOs.3 & 4 OF 2O2S 0 pU u- w. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I'A' No' t,., otz-o25 crt.p. No. \ o q t( or 2025 Between: Sulochana @ Yerva Sulochana' W/o. Sathi Reddy, ;;;;19 vears, occ: Housewife' ilo. L04a913, PVN Colony' t',ialkajgiri, HYderabad' Petitioner/Respondent No'2 I 2 3 4 AND G. Sneha Reddy @ GanuPa Sneha' ivlo. v.*u Rajashekhar Reddy' olo. Ganupa LaxmareddY, 2e Years, occ: pvt' EmPloYee' il;;;fi Ai;"+]6i;ffi palaPallY, Dubbak Mandal' 'niJul -oitttia, telangana - s02108; PresentlY residing at U'S'A'' Reo. bv her GPA Holder - Ganupa Laxmareddy' sld. cinrPu Rajaram ReddY' Aoed 62 Years, Occ: Farmer' ii"-"o-gsl, ouirfalapallv, Dubbak Mandal' i'i.'iut biltri.t, Telangana - s02108' GanuPa LaxmareddY, ilo. cunrPu Raja RamreddY' Aoed 62 Yea6, Occ: Farmer' il;:fi i;trmPalaPallY, Dubbak Mandal' ii"iur biltti.t, ielansana - s02108' Ganuoa Mahender ReddY, il., cunuou Chinna Malla Reddy' io.O +l years, Occ: Private Employee'. Ai;"4-ei;ft PalaPallY' Dubbak Mandal' 'l,iJur. biitria, Telangana - 502108' Ganuoa Jeevan Reddy, S/o' Ganupa Rajaram Reddy' lo"O'Sg Years, Occ: Retired' iiJ. ri.ti'r-":11, Amulva Residencv' Java Nagar'^^. Un"r'nrJ ni.iftolonv, kukatpallv' Hvderabad - s00072' & \.. Respondent Nos.1 to s/Petitioners 5 6 Ganupa Jalaja, W/o. Ganupa Laxmareddy, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Housewife, Rlo. 4-95, Dumpalapally, Dubbak Mandal, Medak District, Telangana - 502108. The State of Telangana, Through P.S. Medchal, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Respondent No.6/Respondent No.2 JOINT MEMO

1. It is submitted that the Petitioner herein had filed a complaint and the same was registered as Crime No,1184 of 2024 of p.S. IVedchal, dated 17.t2.2024 against Respondent Nos.1 to 5/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 for the offences U/Sec.341, 506, r/w 34 IPC.

2. It is submitted that the present matter arises out of a matrimonial dispute between Respondent No.1 herein and the son ofthe petitioner herein / defacto complainant. At the instance of the elders, the dispute has been amicably settled out of Court. The Respondent No.l and the son of the defacto complainant have mutually agreed to proceed with filing a petition for divorce by mutual consent and either sides families decided to withdraw the criminal cases filed against each other. Therefore, keeping the matter pending would serve no purpose/ pafticularly when de facto complainant is not inclined to pursue the case any further.

3. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the continuation of proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 5 pursuant to the FIR No. No. 1184 of 2024 of of P.S. Medchal, dated 77.12.2024 are desirable to be closed.

4. Hence, this loint Memo. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner herein/Respondent No.2/Defacto-Complainant to compound and compromise offences with the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein/petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 by allowing the crimtnal petition by quashing the proceedings against the % Accused Nos.l to 5 in Crime No'1184 of 2024 of P'S' Medchal and the C'C' if any arisingtherefromanclpendingon,thefileoftheHon,blelXAdditionalJudicial MagistrateofFirstClass,MedchalMalkajgiriDistrict'atMedchalandpasssuchother order and orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Place: HYderabad Date: 1 .042025 9^rrtf4* l.) Counsel ffr petiticin6r/ne'spondent No'2/ Defacto-comPlaina nt Respondent No. UPetitioner No' 1/ Accused No.1 .Yld-q Respon dent No. 3/Petitioner No.3/ Accused No.3 Gr -lJ*\a. Respondent No.5/Petitioner No'5/ Accused No.5 Y- sJ" Petitioner/ResPon dent No.2/ Defacto-comPlainant Respondent No.2/Petitioner No'2/ Accused No 2 Respondent No.4/Petitioner No'4/ Accused No'4 Counsel for ResPondent Nos l to 5/ Petitioners/Accused Nos'1 to 5