The High Court · 2025

Judgment

5. 6 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. District Collector, Kamareddy District. Revenue Divisionat Officer, Kamareddy District. Tahsildhar, Kamareddy Mandal AND District. B.Ramkishan, S/o. Rajeshwar, Aged about 67 years, Occ- Retd. Employee, R/o. H.No.5-8-554, Ashoknagar, Kamareddy District. Jeggari lndira, W/o. J.Devendar, Aged about 61 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o. 3-12-126111218, Street No.2, PS Colony, Ganesh Nagar, Ramantha;iur, Hyderabad-500013.

7. P.Shoba Rani, W/o. Siddiramulu, Aged about 59 years, Occ- Household, R/o. H.No'5-3-618/A,Vidyanagar,KamareddyDistrict.

8. Yettam Satyanarayana, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ- Agriculture,

R/o. H.No.5-8-'100014, Srinivas Nagar, Kamareddy Distiict. : : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction to the Respondents, more so in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to; ...RESPONDENTS (a) Declaring the Proceedings dated 25.07.2025 vide Lr.No.B21183412125 issued by the 3rd Respondent herein, in so far as, including a condition subjec: to third party claims, if any, which have to be challenged before the Comp€tent Court of Law for redressal for grievance', while approving the Petitiorrers Application No.2500024'199 under TtV-33 - Passbook Data Correclion for correction of Land Nature, Classification, Manner in which Land Acquired, Land Type in respect of lands in Sy.No.'l01/D1 & 10'l/E admeasiuring Ac.O-20 Gts. & Ac.0-30 Gts. respectively of Narasanapalle Village, Kamareddy Mandal AND District, as illegal, arbitrarily and against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14 and 3004 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently to quash the same. (b) To diret;t the 2nd Respondent to process and finalize the Petitioner's Application No.2500024199 as expeditious as possible, in accordance with law; lA NO: 1 OF 20 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of thr: Petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.0-20 Guntas in Survey No.101/D/1 and Ac.0-30 Guntas in Survey No.101/E, total admeasuring Ac.1-10 Guntas situated at Narasanapalle Village, Kamareddy Mandal & District, in the interest of justicer, pending disposal of the writ petition 2 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd to 4th Respondents not to disturb the Petitioner's extent of land admeasuring Ac.0-20 Guntas in survey No.101/D/1 and Ac.0-30 Guntas in survey No.101/E, total admeasuring Ac.1-10 Guntas situated at Narasanapalle Village, Kamareddy Mandal & District, in Bhu-Bharathi Portal Or in any other offline/online Process,, in any manner whatsoever, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ petition in and pass Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SHARATH CHANDUPATLA, COUNSEL REPRESENTING FOR SRI ROHIT POGULA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 TO 8 : ----- The Court made the following: ORDER rHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.24188 OF 2o25 ORDERi This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constiturtion of India, seeking the following relief/s:- *... to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the nature of Mandamus, (a) D:claring the Proceedings dated 25.O7.2025 vide Lr.No.B2/1834 12025 issued by the 3.d Respondent herein, in so far as, including a condition " subJect to thlrd partg clalms, lf ang, uthich have to be challenged before the Cotnpetent Court of Laut for red.ressal for grleoance", while approving the Petitioner's Application No.2500024 199 under TM- 33 -Passbook Data Correction for correction of Land Nature, Cl.rssification, Manner in which Land Acquired, Land Type in respect o[ larrds in Sy.No. 101/Dl & 101/E admeasuring Ac.0-20 Grs. & Ac.0-3O Gts. respectively of Narasanapalle Village, Kamareddy Mandal & District, as illegal, arbitrarily and against the principtes of natural justice and in violation of Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and conseqlrently to quash the same. (b) To direct the 2nd Respondent to process and finalize the petitioner's Ap1>lication No.2500024 199 as expeditious as possible, in accordance wit.r lau'; and (c) To ;tass such other order or orders ..."

2. ' Hea-:d Mr.Sharath Chandupatla, learned counsel representing Mr.Rohit Pogula, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing on-line, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Governme:et Pleader for Revenue representing learned Governmetrt Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4

3. Memr> vide U.S.R.No.109568 of 2025 shows that Notice to respon'1ent Nos.6, 7 and 8 is returned with an i i : 2 endorsement "delivered" and service of uotice on respondent No.5 is "refused". Perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein has applied for F-line application dated

11.O7.2025 vide Applicatior-r No.TTDERO22SOl2O4l2B for survey of his lands in Survey No.l}l lD I I (Ac.0.2O Gts.) and l)l /E (Ac O-30 Gts.) of Narasannapalle Village and the same is pending consideration.

5. He states respondent No.3 Lr.No.B2 I LB34 12025 dated 25.O7 .2025 recommended the case of ttre petitioner to respondent No.2 for approval on a condition subject to thircl party claims i[ any, which have to be challenged before the competent Court of law for redressal of grievance. He states that irnposing the said condition is illegal and seeks to pass appropriate orders.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue contends that upon physical inspection of subject lands and verification of entries in revenue records, the request of the applicant for pass book data correction were looked into and on exarnining the same with reference to the provisions of \ t I J,*''..;-,.;;.'lE 3 Bhu Bharathi under ROR Act, the said application was transmitt.ed to the District Collector/respondent No.2 on the point of c:ompetency. He further states that the said condition rvas imposecl only as a precautionary measure and to avoid any sort of ambiguity. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition.

7. Having regard to the submissions of all the learned counsel, ()n perusal of the material available on record and upon conr;idering the fact that the matter is pending before respondent No.2, if at all the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the stipulated condition, he is directed to file an applicatiof: to that effect before respondent No.2. Upon filing such application, respondent No.2 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, slrictly in accordance with law, by putting all the interested parties on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. since, this court has directed respond.ent No.2 to issue notices to all the interested parties and since rrotice is already served. to respondent Nos.6 to 8, further serr,'ice of notice upon respondent Nos.6 to B stSnds dispensed vvith. 4 8 with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. /TRUE SD/. K. BHAVANI SWAMY TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, elangana Secretariat, The 1 Il',q Priryipat Secretary, Revenue urate ot lelangana, Hyderabad. 2. Distri$ Cof*ctgr, Kamareddy District. 3. Revenue Divisional Offiger, Kamareddy District. 4. Tahsildhar, Kamareddy,Mandal AND District. 5. One Ce to SRI ROHTT POGULA, Advocate tOpUCI 6' GP FoR REVENUE, High Court for the stare of retangana. H,?rftt 'o 7. Two CD Co pies PVL 6rI\ HIGH COURT DATED:it911012025 / ORDER WP.No.2z[188 of 2025 $ 3 tl rtEM * ---.tt DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (9 tpf" e) 9,b e r\r\ d 0r'